1. Migrant-friendly coalitions should stress the positive-sum angle of cross-border solidarity. The economic growth benefits of immigration are pretty ironclad. This is the absolute benefit Bertram identifies. There's still the relative standing to address ...
2a. Stress and *cultivate* the political advantages of free movement. More workers at least potentially means more labor power in struggles against the oligarchic class. This at least addresses relative standing against the domestic rich, if not the rest of the world.
2b. This is inspired by Suzy Lee's left case for open borders. But it's similar to the @hmcghee case for positive sum antiracist politics that I've been going on about lately. Immigrants aren't the enemy. They're allies against system-rigging elites. catalyst-journal.com/2019/03/the-ca…
3. A la @mattyglesias, emphasize national greatness. "America rocks because we offer a golden door to those yearning to breathe free." This harnesses patriotism for cosmopolitan ends & provides a pro-social outlet for concerns about relative standing against other countries.
4. Aggressively proselytize the liberal ethos of openness. Freedom of movement means saying *Yes to people.* The YIMBY and @ne0liberal movements are very good on this.
A note on populism: #2 above could be interpreted as populist, and that's fine, but I also think that calling out and eroding entrenched advantage, like that of the citizenship premium and elites fostering division within the working class, is an old, venerable liberal agenda.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I liked this defense of free movement against the "threat" of cultural change by @donovanchoy at @libertarianism very much. From the impossibility of genuine preservation (left) to the defense of openness in the Kukathas invocation (right). 1/3 libertarianism.org/articles/cultu…
I've been dusting off some of my old open borders writings preparing for a new essay. This is very much in the spirit of what I was trying to write here: 2/3 openborders.info/blog/the-illus…
I was vibing along to the @donovanchoy piece when I was thrown out of my reverie by my old open borders nemesis: "keyhole solutions." The juxtaposition w/ Kukathas is interesting given his concern for the extent of control *over natives* that immigration restriction brings. 3/4
I want to describe a phenomenon that partially explains the stickiness of hostility toward and misinformation about the whole suite of social justice concepts. Here's a THREAD from personal experience.
As a youngster in the late 90s/early 00s I read a lot of folks who would go on to become the "IDW". Dawkins, Shermer, Harris, Pinker, etc. This was my introduction to "intellectual" fare. I have no regrets about this, but it built a certain ideological momentum. 2/
Dawkins, to take one example, was a legit scientist—the Selfish Gene was one of the first "big books" that I read and it was excellent—who wrote beautifully, stoked my nascent atheism, and had some apparent authority both in his field and generally as a public intellectual. 3/
At first I thought this must have been a stirring community defense of the Adam Smith statue against removal. But, even better, it was a successful direct collective action against UK Immigration Enforcement's attempt to remove immigrants. Most impressive, Glasgow!!
What a curiously strongly worded tweet. Who are the good counter-examples? Adam Smith obviously. Condorcet, Lafayette, de Staël, Constant, Say. Does Paine count as a liberal? Who else?
Anyway I'm all in favor of dunking on liberals where they go wrong. Many liberals did defend slavery! Also imperialism, patriarchy, etc. But one of the more interesting things about reading the early liberals is how it was often *later* liberals who flubbed these issues.
.@HelenaRosenblat's Lost History of Liberalism and @Jennife31863712's Turn to Empire provide good material for the view that later liberals, partly due to gaining some actual power, lost their way on—from the perspective of we moderns—some crucial issues.
This is the greatest Star Wars thread of all time. @imaginmatrix reconceives the conflict as btwn the Council & Anakin over Anakin & Padmé's marriage and Anakin's revolutionary politics. Anakin is far more interesting on this telling.
In this thread I try to write a better ending for Rise of Skywalker. I still object to reintroducing Palpatine—more radical would've been *no* big baddie, but a reckoning with the Social Question—but if you gotta keep Palps, let Ben live & Rey go Dark.
It's no surprise I love both Star Wars and the #WheelOfTime: they have deep thematic resonances. In this thread I explore some of these. Happy #MayThe4th! cc #TwitterOfTime for this one.
My latest at @liberalcurrents expands my thoughts on the English and Kalla "Racial Equality Frames" study and the way liberal moderates seized on its results to counsel tip-toeing around racial justice. This is a mistake. THREAD liberalcurrents.com/scorched-earth…
.@mattyglesias's penchant for left-punching is irritating, but he's indispensable on issues very important to me: liberal housing/zoning reform & expanding freedom of movement. See @matthewdownhour's deservedly glowing review of One Billion Americans. 3/n liberalcurrents.com/liberalism-and…