Just like our problem isn’t just one particular “thing,” our solution can’t be one particular “thing” either; anyone serious about systems change must have a holistic, “every-tool-in-the-toolkit” approach that utilizes various institutions to produce a better, superseding system.
There is no need to create false dichotomies around institutional vehicles (ex: “unions vs. co-ops”).
Our #DualPower method leaves strategical room open around worker co-ops, unions, electoral politics, and more.
But we know what we want and, thus, pinpoint limits of each area.
Unions can bring workers together in various ways and at different scales/levels, but may not necessarily lead to something more than mere agitation for more (in wages or rights) within the capitalist logic, or abandonment of unnecessary and ecologically unsustainable industries.
Worker co-ops at their best plant embryonic seeds for cooperative social relations around labor that would define a future socialist society, but can be challenged and exploited via market and profit motives + poor governance models, and are not inherently developed around needs.
Electoral politics are commonly used to explore entryist tactics that usually lead to “progressive” forces being absorbed by the logic of capital and the state, but leave room for municipalism, which can turn “representative democracy” on its head in service to direct democracy.
The point is:
Because we know key elements of the future society we want to live in (direct democracy, cooperation, communalism, symbiosis with non-human nature, etc.) and study revolutionary history from all around the world, we know how crucial nondogmatism around strategy is.
The system as it stands now is made up of many different parts that function in different ways in different places. Each of these parts need to be undone in the building of something better. The task is daunting, and thus requires openness and holistic creativity around strategy.
This strategy, in our view, must ultimately be in service to the cultivation of direct democracy in every sphere of life.
Informal hierarchies will emerge, but more hierarchy produces coercive power and domination, and it must be countered with democratic practice at every turn.
Needless to say, any efforts to cultivate a directly democratic society must deal with labor especially, and this is why our org and partners tend to place principle stress on the worker co-op as an entrypoint institution for us to explore.
It helps to think about #DualPower as a method or an approach that has us make use of whatever we can in service to building a parallel system radically different from the one we are currently suffering under.
Both history and the present show us there is much at our fingertips.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Pushing “abolition” without specifying what we’re supplanting existing systems with (or mapping out ways of supplanting) is not “revolutionary.”
And we can’t compartmentalize institutions of oppression; they are interconnected.
Thus, we need holistic approaches involving labor.
There were people critiquing “abolition” as a buzzword in the 1800s, and they were right.
Essential to them was not only an anti-capitalist position, but also an anti-authoritarian position recognizing that our battle goes beyond mere class exploitation.
States are the most violent, destructive, anti-democratic structures ever produced by humankind.
They are weapons of class rule and the ultimate expression of domination.
The idea that there could ever be a “democratic state” is oxymoronic.
And just so we’re clear:
The U.S. is also an apartheid state, so for anyone to imply that the U.S. or any other nation-states of the “West” are somehow bastions of democracy in contrast to what we’re seeing with the State of Israel is to hold on to a “dream” built on nightmares.
We’re not going to stop imperialism by making appeals to the imperialists and their forces of domination and destruction.
We’ll stop imperialism when we do the hard(est) work of building parallel social, economic, and political infrastructure able to undergird a defensive force.
This “parallel social, economic, and political infrastructure” can’t be grounded in the same social relations and organization that define the oppressive system we’re in.
It has to be grounded in cooperation, communalism, and direct democracy.
It has to feel worth fighting for.
It’s not just about striking, unionizing, or doing work around organized labor for individual (reactive) actions. It’s about a holistic approach centered on “world-building” that can generate not only a new, liberatory social logic, but resources for defensive infrastructure too.
The State of Israel is a settler-colonialist nation-state just like the USA, so recent IOF attacks on Palestinians at their place of worship in East Jerusalem come as no surprise.
The solution, however, doesn’t lie in more bourgeois nationalism and statism, let alone Capitalism.
Various forces – political, religious, etc. – exploit the violent, reactionary acts of the Israeli nation-state against the Palestinian people to push their own agendas.
These agendas almost never have anything to do with freedom, but rather more forms or flavors of domination.
The solution lies in transcending the nation-state model, theocracy, and the capitalist system altogether.
The solution lies in a global, confederal system that does away with colonial borders, and is defined by *directly* democratic social, economic, and political organization.
Anyone who accepts or supports top-down, hierarchical social relations is authoritarian.
Both Liberals and Conservatives are authoritarian by this metric, since they support Capitalism.
Forces Libs and Conservatives typically label “authoritarian” are usually authoritarian too.
What most Liberals, Conservatives, and authoritarian “Leftists” don’t grasp is that anything truly “Left” is where direct democracy begins, and exploitation + domination ends.
Hierarchy and extraction, whether upheld by private corporations or a state, can only be authoritarian.
Look past surface aesthetics and rhetoric and ask yourself these questions when evaluating whether or not political orgs and/or tendencies are authoritarian:
Are they okay with hierarchy and individual leaders giving orders from the top? Are these “leaders” instantly recallable?
When are we going to confront the reality that countless “Left” media personalities are directly and indirectly complicit in perpetuating the narrative that there is no way out, simply by critiquing *what is*, without exploring (in very practical, accessible terms) *what can be*?
One of the most insidious elements of this phenomenon is that it is actually driven by the logics of these social media platforms most of us use to communicate.
Talking heads channel our righteous rage into low-hanging-fruit “takes” instead of informational seeds for liberation.
“Organize locally,” “join a union,” and “make sure to vote in your local elections” are frequently empty, meaningless, vague, footnote talking points anchored in zero political programs, and in what are typically broader discussions about horrible recent events, or personalities.