Tweet

Michael Veale

27 May, 8 tweets, 4 min read

https://twitter.com/MSFTResearch/status/1392904046537756676

Hey Microsoft Research people who think that constant facial emotion analysis might not be a great thing (among others), what do you think of this proposed Teams feature published at CHI to spotlight videos of audience members with high affective ‘scores’? microsoft.com/en-us/research…

https://twitter.com/MSFTResearch/status/1392904046537756676

Requires constantly pouring all face data on Teams through Azure APIs. Especially identifies head gestures and confusion to pull audience members out to the front, just in case you weren’t policing your face enough during meetings already.

Also note that Microsoft announced on Tuesday that it is opening up its Teams APIs to try to become a much wider platform to eat all remote work, so even if Teams didn’t decide to implement this directly, employers could through third party integration! protocol.com/newsletters/so…

Meanwhile yesterday (can’t make it up) Microsoft prez Brad Smith concerned about powerful entities able to watch you like 1984, that technology might be racing ahead.

Well it will do Brad if you flog face surveillance as a service to employers… bbc.com/news/technolog…

‘if we’re not careful it could come to pass’ — maybe being careful means tell the corporation you lead not to design, build and deploy these things (even speculatively; this paper is not yet a product) as literal infrastructures underpinning the majority of online meetings!

Usually I think that Microsoft Research is far far away from product in Microsoft, and often that is true. However Teams seems closer. The overlapping team that wrote this paper also designed Together Mode for teams, which was rapidly deployed last year. news.microsoft.com/innovation-sto…

The research team is driven by interesting Qs. Together Mode examined mental fatigue—useful! But running all faces through emotion APIs creates reusable, expandable computational infrastructure. HCI is very crap at evaluating its societal effects, as it lacks a theory of power.

As a platform side note I was only made aware of this paper because Microsoft sent it to me this morning as a promoted tweet… that’s one method of societal engagement I guess.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @mikarv

Michael Veale

@mikarv

26 May

@OpenRightsGroup

Big UK GDPR case: Court of Appeal rules in favour of the @OpenRightsGroup @the3million: Immigration Exemption to SARs is incompatible with Art 23 GDPR. This is a new exemption from 2018 the Home Office uses to withhold data rights info in 59% of cases. bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/…

Warby LJ is sympathetic to CJEU jurisprudence that 'the legal basis which permits the interference with those rights must itself define the scope of the limitation', noting that the Immigration E is highly discretionary, and the DPA18 does not contain limits on its scope.

However, Warby LJ judges the case more narrowly on a reading of Article 23(2), which permits Member States to restrict a GDPR right for public interest only if a 'legislative measure' contains limiting provisions.

Read 15 tweets

Michael Veale

@mikarv

25 May

Big Brother Watch now out. Looking at the dissents, it does not look good for anti-surveillance campaigners: 'with the present judgment the Strasbourg Court has just opened the gates for an electronic “Big Brother” in Europe' hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-2100…

and we go live to Strasbourg

Going to post some interesting pieces (not a judgment summary!) here. Firstly, that Contracting States can transfer Convention-compliant bulk intercept material to non-Contracting states that only have minimal protections (e.g. on keeping it secure/confidential). AKA the USA.

Read 21 tweets

Michael Veale

@mikarv

14 May

@BBCNewsnight

thank you for all the nice comments about the @BBCNewsnight interview! I tried to communicate infrastructure's importance. if new to you, here is a 🧵of some (not all!) academic work by others which highlights the power of technical infrastructure (rather than eg data).

@nielstenoever

on power and Internet infrastructure below the application layer (eg websites, apps) @nielstenoever's thesis nielstenoever.net/wp-content/upl…; @C___CS doi.org/10.1016/j.telp…; @LauraDeNardis and @ChrisTMarsden's books e.g. oapen.org/record/622853

@julie17usc

on enclosure by platforms, @julie17usc's book doi.org/10.1093/oso/97…; on security as driving control, @zittrain's paper dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/hand…;

Read 5 tweets

Michael Veale

@mikarv

4 May

https://twitter.com/peng/status/1389420397586694149

The Luca QR code Covid app, (for-profit system flogged to 🇩🇪 Länder) has been compromised (in a way that the official CoronaWarnApp’s QR system can’t be), through a website that lets you check in any phone number to wherever you want—even regional prime ministers! 🧵 on the saga:

https://twitter.com/peng/status/1389420397586694149

While hard to believe, Luca was adopted by Länder after huge lobbying from hospitality who convinced them that a hasty app w a 6 mo free trial for venues & big cost for health authorities would i) allow reopening, ii) help Länder win upcoming 🗳 by making national gov look slow

Luca’s slick PR campaign, where they became mostly known to health authorities by aggressive marketing w celebrities, meant that no-one discussed or scrutinised the technical details. Politicians have even admitted this, and DPAs accepted statements of ‘encryption’ as secure.

Read 10 tweets

Michael Veale

@mikarv

14 Apr

Lots of selected thoughts on the draft leaked EU AI regulation follow. Not a summary but hopefully useful. 🧵

Blacklisted art 4 AI (except general scoring) exempts include state use for public security, including by contractors. Tech designed to ‘manipulate’ ppl ‘to their detriment’, to ‘target their vulnerabilities’ or profile comms metadata in indiscriminate way v possible for states.

This is clearly designed in part not to eg further upset France in the La Quadrature du Net case, where black boxes algorithmic systems inside telcos were limited. Same language as CJEU used in Art 4(c). Clear exemptions for orgs ‘on behalf’ of state to avoid CJEU scope creep.

Read 30 tweets