For the non-scientist who might be confused by the CoV-2 origin debate, a proper sentence by a scientist has two parts. The first part is the data, the observation; the second part is the conclusion that follows from the data.
Examples: #COVID19
Examples: #COVID19
Based on testing 80,000 animals and finding no CoV-2 in any of them, one can conclude from statistics that the prevalence of CoV-2 where the testing was done must be less than 0.0004%.
Given that the zoonoses, SARS1 and MERS, had >85% positive tests in markets, the likelihood CoV-2 is a zoonosis like SARS1 or MERS is less than 1 in a 1,000,000.
See how easy it is when you say, data first, conclusion last.
Don't be fooled by degrees or university appointments.
If all someone gives you is a conclusion, they are not giving you science; they're just bullying you.
Don't be fooled by degrees or university appointments.
If all someone gives you is a conclusion, they are not giving you science; they're just bullying you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
