Dr Steven Quay Profile picture
Physician-Scientist Best Selling Author
Kim Profile picture 2 subscribed
Aug 28, 2023 5 tweets 2 min read
Interesting how the envelope (A) and spike (E) genes of SARS-CoV-2 & RaTG13 but not the membrane or nucleocapsid genes segregate outside all bat CoVs with respect to codon usage?

This is behavior of a synthetic gene, constructed for improved laboratory amplification. Image

Every single bat CoV hates the CGG codon. Every. single. one.

So which bat virus would recombine to make SARS-CoV-2? There isn't one ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Image
Oct 20, 2022 11 tweets 2 min read
Restriction Site Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 demonstrates the signature of a synthetic virus

The likelihood SARS-CoV2 is a natural sarbecovirus is less that one in a billion based on this analysis

Prior publication purposely delayed.
1/10 zenodo.org/record/7226587…
Jun 13, 2022 18 tweets 5 min read
1/ Here is a thread of the slides from my recent YouTube video on the evidence against a market origin of SARS-CoV-2. #COVID19 #COVID #SARSCoV #OriginOfCovid 2/
Sep 15, 2021 6 tweets 1 min read
Facts
1. CoV outbreak near CoV research institute (the John Stewart effect) of CoV found >1000 km to the south in nature but 96% match at WIV
2. No animal from market, city, province, or all of China with CoV. 80,000 tested
3. Single 'Virus Zero' with no posterior diversity 4. No pre-epidemic seroconversion. 9000+ tested
5. Spike Protein S1/S2 furin site never seen before in >1000 sarbecoviruses
6. CCG-CCG codon dimer never seen before in >1000 sarbecoviruses.
7. Recombination across subgenera to solve #5 & #6 either prohibited or rare.
May 27, 2021 4 tweets 1 min read
For the non-scientist who might be confused by the CoV-2 origin debate, a proper sentence by a scientist has two parts. The first part is the data, the observation; the second part is the conclusion that follows from the data.

Examples: #COVID19 Based on testing 80,000 animals and finding no CoV-2 in any of them, one can conclude from statistics that the prevalence of CoV-2 where the testing was done must be less than 0.0004%.
Mar 23, 2021 7 tweets 2 min read
I agree this is not an example of codon optimization for the same reason; it is done over a larger region.

But natural selection in betacoronaviruses has NEVER produced a -CGG-CGG- dimer codon pair. Repeating: there has never been this codon dimer in a coronavirus from nature. So after scanning 580,000 betacoronavirus codons you suddenly have a -CGG-CGG- cannot be waved away with the 'sh#@' happens hypothesis. Remember, codons have a matching tRNA so putting the two rarest codons together is going to slow/stall transcription.