There’s been a lot of confusion centered around this (very cool) video of yesterday’s Falcon 9 launch so I wanted to jump in and clear some things up

Short thread…
#AvGeek #Falcon9 #SpaceX @elonmusk
For starters, I recommend checking out this earlier thread I wrote on vapor cones and expansion fans as a lot of relevant points are covered there, so I won’t circle back to everything

This should explain the *transonic* vapor collar close to the rocket
Okay, so the audio in the original video is misleading. This event happened at about 9km altitude, so any wave generated at that instant would reach the ground roughly 30sec later. Not sure how the audio was synced but if it’s real time from the ground, it’s coincidental
Notice you don’t hear this “boom” in the original SpaceX audio
Now, the flash of white you see *is* associated w the vehicle reaching supersonic speed & the resulting shock wave that forms at the nose

NASA & @DJSnM have noted this is related to upper cloud layer ice crystals interacting with the passing shock wave
➡️ nasa.gov/mission_pages/…
Note that if you look closely you can even see the shadow of the rocket in the thin layer of clouds

I think there’s still some speculation as to the exact mechanism at play here but the NASA explanation tracks IMO
It’s worth clarifying that the shock wave & sonic boom are not transient processes—i.e. it’s not some instantaneous event that happens when you reach Mach 1 like an explosion/blast that then goes away

It’s a wave system that remains attached to the vehicle & moves w/ it
📷NASA
As a stationary observer you just hear a single boom when the wave moves past you
Hope that helps, please share and drop this in the replies to some of the posts going around!
Oh and if you want to see something a little similar to a shock wave system forming on a vehicle accelerating beyond Mach 1, here’s a schlieren video we recently recorded of a wedge during startup of our Mach 7 facility

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Combs (iterative design enjoyer)

Chris Combs (iterative design enjoyer) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrChrisCombs

Dec 24
Aside from the fact that you can't just wave a wand and get to Mars in 3 years (there's only one more launch window between now and then: Q4 2026)

You simply CANNOT close NASA Ames

That site has a concentration of some of the most in-demand test infrastructure in the world. Stuff we (sadly) will probably never build again. Would set US defense and space testing capability back decades just to score some political points (California BAD! NASA engineers LAZY!)Image
Take for example the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Wind Tunnel Complex

Comprised of the two largest wind tunnels in the world. Basically the only places you can test aircraft at full scale

40 ft x 80 ft and 80 ft x 120 ft wind tunnels. Absolutely INSANE Image
There's the arc jet complex

This is really the best way we have to test thermal protection materials for space and defense applications

Wanna go to Mars? You need these

There are fewer than 10 high-throughput arc jets in the US. Ames has 4

DON'T BE IDIOTS Image
Read 6 tweets
Feb 5
Take that CFD nerds Image
From the Anderson hypersonics book Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 14, 2023
So, if I understand correctly, it sounds like GE has successfully tested a turbine-based combined-cycle engine that incorporates: 1) gas turbine; 2) rotating detonation engine; 3) ramjet; 4) scramjet 🤯

Could in theory go from 0 to Mach 10+

Demo at full scale planned for 2024 Image
GE press release:

Some earlier reporting on the concept: geaerospace.com/press-release/…
aviationweek.com/shownews/paris…
Here's my explainer thread on turbine-based combined-cycle (TBCC) engines
Read 7 tweets
Nov 11, 2023
As we approach what may be a historic Starship flight test, this Reuters report is really, really bad

No excuses: as arguably the number one launch provider *in the world* the safety culture at SpaceX has to be better. They should be setting the standard (in a good way)

If we are going to continue giving them billions annually in taxpayer dollars, they can’t keep treating workers like disposable meat puppets


Image
And yes before you ask these numbers are much worse than industry averages Image
This is an absolutely total systematic failure that goes beyond SpaceX—NASA has some explaining to do about how they allowed SpaceX to operate in their own backyard allowing a > 20% injury rate Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 10, 2023
If you're ever frustrated by someone with a PhD acting like a know-it-all outside their niche field of study, just remember that Albert Einstein tried to design an airfoil but it performed so poorly during testing it's flight characteristics were compared to a "pregnant duck"
HT to @milan_tomicc for reminding me of this the other day
For a bit more technical insight, bottom line is that Einstein designed this entirely using Bernoulli theory.

Stall at 12deg AoA @ 92 L/D

He later confessed he was "ashamed" and "this is what can happen to a man that thinks a lot but reads little"

Read 4 tweets
Apr 21, 2023
Am I being unreasonable in thinking that "clearing the launch pad" (that everyone knew would be destroyed) is a bit of a low bar for arguably the most successful launch company *ever*?

Sorry for having higher expectations for SpaceX?

The whole thing feels half-baked and rushed
I really want SpaceX to do well

We NEED SpaceX to do well

SpaceX has a great track record of success

There are tons of insanely smart, hard-working, talented people there

NASA needs Starship to put boots on the moon

So I expect more than what we got yesterday
When some brand new startup or a university rocket club sends their rocket into a death spiral at T+4min we all pat them on the back and say "space is hard" and "you'll figure it out"

I hold SpaceX (and NASA) to a much higher standard. SpaceX is better than this. It wasn't ready
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(