1/ Thread: $ADSK FY 1Q’22 Update

ADSK had a pretty decent 1Q, comfortably beating high end of the revenue guidance. 98% of revenue are now recurring, and net revenue retention was in the range of 100-110%.

Topline guidance was raised by ~$40 mn. Here are my notes from the call
2/ Q1 is expected to be trough from growth standpoint and the rest of the year is likely to have some acceleration post-pandemic. ~75% of FCF of this year will be generated in the 2H.
3/ Billings from converting noncompliant users doubled YoY in Q1. In fact, a noncompliant customer converted into one of the largest premium customers.

But don’t expect hockey stick growth from conversion of noncompliant users. ADSK wants to gradually and naturally convert.
4/ “Fusion 360 has reached an adoption tipping point”.

Why? Network effects and deepening penetration among existing customers.

This is good to see since ADSK has been touting Fusion 360 as an important LT growth lever for the company.
5/ Is Fusion 360 cannibalizing Inventor? Not yet, and even when it does, ASP impact will be neutral.
6/ Revenue from direct sales increased 25% YoY and now 33% (vs 30% last yr) of total revenue.

Direct sales lead to greater price realization for ADSK which is another tailwind for topline.
7/ Some comments regarding the most recent acquisition: Upchain, which will be integrated to Fusion 360.
8/ Routine and “mandatory” question from sell-side how ADSK is going to deliver $2.4 Bn FY’23 which implies ~50% YoY.

CFO mentioned conversion of noncompliant users, increased penetration of direct sales, and favorable macro backdrop as the reason for their confidence.
9/ If I remember correctly, @SouthernValue95 once mentioned one of the big drivers for FCF is some large multi-year contracts that are up for renewal next year, so ADSK may enjoy more favorable NWC benefit next year which may also explain ~50% ramp up next year.
10/ “Even the infrastructure bill could be a wildcard for us. We're hopeful, although nothing is baked into our numbers at this point.”

ADSK is pretty focused on road, rail, and water when it comes to public infrastructure which it believes to be sweet spot.
End/ My deep dive on $ADSK (paywall): mbi-deepdives.com/adsk/ (Disclosure: I'm long)

Subscribe here: mbi-deepdives.com/plans/subscrib…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mostly Borrowed Ideas

Mostly Borrowed Ideas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @borrowed_ideas

26 May
1/9 Thread: Retention rate illusions

With the rise of SaaS businesses, retention rate is often discussed and followed by investors.

Here are some of the notes I took from an academic paper discussing illusions/misconceptions when it comes to retention rates.
2/9 Issue #1: Reported retention rate may not be indicative of realized renewal rate. Let me give an example.

Let’s say a business reports retention rate is 95% which is, of course, awesome. What is less discussed, however, is the duration of the customer contracts.
3/9 To illustrate why it is important, imagine Company A, B, and C all report 95% retention rates, but customers only renew the contracts in every 1, 3, and 5 year respectively.

Here’s how the reported and underlying retention rate differs for these companies.
Read 9 tweets
24 May
1/8 Thread: Changing your mind

It's easy to read Keynes' quote, "When the facts change, I change my mind - what do you do, sir?" and nod your head; but it doesn't make it any less difficult for anyone to change their opinions.

Why is that?
2/8 Murakami had a great quote that I try to remind myself every time I disagree with someone:

“Always remember that to argue, and win, is to break down the reality of the person you are arguing against. It is painful to lose your reality, so be kind, even if you are right.”
3/8 Unfortunately, one of the downsides of arguments/debates on twitter or any social media is it's mostly performative in nature.

You not only lose arguments that shatter your "reality", you go through the experience publicly which makes it even harder to accept and change.
Read 8 tweets
22 May
1/ Thread: Customer-based Corporate Valuation

@mjmauboussin and Callahan recently published a piece highlighting Customer-based Corporate Valuation (CBCV) which works particularly well for subscription businesses.

Here are my notes.
2/ Subscription based businesses’ topline grew 17.8% in 2012-2020 period whereas S&P 500 grew sales ~2% during the same time.

Digital subscription has also expanded TAM significantly for some businesses.

$NYT print subscription in 1996: 1.1 mn vs digital subs in 2021: 5.3 mn
3/ The CBCV framework appears simple: customer value comes from existing and future customers. Of course, the devil is the details.

Let’s get to it.
Read 22 tweets
16 May
1/ Thread: Why I am an active investor

One of the questions most investors ask themselves at least at some point is whether they are indeed good investors, or all their past success are just random luck which by definition may not persist.
2/ My basic assumption is I am probably not a great investor. Even to be average, it will require a lot of work for me.

A common retort is why bother investing then? If I am so unsure of myself as an investor, shouldn’t I just index?
3/ This feels like equivalent of telling kids there’s no point in playing basketball because they’re never gonna make it to NBA.

I doubt most NBA players knew before touching the basketball that they are probably very good at it and it might be possible to make it a profession.
Read 15 tweets
9 May
1/ I have thought about it a little more and now I'm a bit confused whether FactSet's methodology is actually better than Grant's. Let me explain what's giving me second thoughts.
2/ if we imagine overall earnings of today's market is a stable pool of total earnings that grows at a historically similar rate, it perhaps makes sense to just the total earnings of the market rather than adjusting it by their mcap weights.
3/ Companies within today's index will die or be left out and new companies will join, and overall profit pool in the economy will just shift around to companies that are creating the most value.
Read 7 tweets
9 May
1/6 Thread: What is the market's valuation multiple?

One of the reasons I was becoming bullish on some of the big tech stocks ~2-3 years ago is some of the them, especially $AAPL was trading at market multiple.
2/6 That didn't make quite sense to me since I thought Apple was clearly a better business than the broader "market".

I now think there was a flaw in that argument.

If I remember correctly, I first came to know about this flaw from one of the pieces by Jim Grant.
3/6 Grant's argument was really simple.

The way market valuation multiple is calculated by FactSet/CapIQ can understate the "true" multiple of the market. Let me explain.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(