The US is not going back into the 1900s while other countries race forward, send rockets to Mars & extend their population’s healthspan by decades.
We have to be leaders in scientific technology and also leaders in biosecurity. Both go hand in hand.
Coming from a 🇨🇦 in the US.
Asking for safer science is in the interests of scientists and the public.
The public should want scientists who advocate for safer science while doing cutting-edge science.
The US is characterized by its technological advances. It’s the birthplace of scientific breakthroughs.
It’s very difficult for scientists to advocate for seat belts when the non-scientists are yelling “No more cars!! No more bicycles!!”
Do you seriously want to live in a country where technology has ground to a standstill and you’re being left behind by everyone else?
I know that some people living in modern society in North America have a fantasy of rural living where no modern medicine or even modern plumbing is available. Please go to a developing country and try it for a few hours. It should be life-changing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today, karma finally kicked in. After spending the last year "just asking questions" and trying to fish out information relevant to the #OriginsOfCovid, I finally became a target of a conspiracy theory and an anonymous twitter mob.
I had been warned about this situation by well-intentioned colleagues, journalists, and even other anonymous twitter users. That a day would come when I would get attacked by anonymous users.
There was always a stream of online harassment, but it definitely peaked this week.
It definitely made me feel more empathy for other scientists who are in a similar situation. I had already been expressing empathy for them and actively asked people on twitter please not to attack because it just makes the conversation immediately adversarial and non-productive.
I see this is raising eyebrows so I better nip it in the bud.
The work I did on human artificial chromosomes (HAC) had been widely presented at local meetings & on the lab website. I talked so openly about it that it could not be patented because it had been publicly disclosed.
The rest of the thread above rightly criticizes the meeting being “secret” - but I always thought that it had been labeled “secret” by the organizers to drum up media coverage (sorry, organizers!).
As far as I could tell, all of the research at that meeting was in public domain.
I’m sorry to reveal this gimmick but actually I think many of the scientists and organizers were eagerly awaiting journalists to call them to talk about the “secret” meeting.
In reality, most scientific meetings happen without any journalists paying attention.
Starting out strong on the topics of gain-of-function research, SARS2-related viruses under study at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the lack of intermediate hosts for SARS2.
I would like to suggest one thing to journalists asking about the #OriginsOfCovid - whether natural or lab-based.
Everyone is asking what do we know, what evidence do we have.
Ask scientists what we don’t know, what evidence are we still waiting for.
New evidence, new information should change a scientist’s perspective.
By forcing scientists to give you a likelihood estimate now, in the absence of definitive evidence, you’re constraining their future ability to change their minds.