1. Harry Jaffa & Allan Bloom were once the best of friends, collaborators on a book on Shakespeare they dedicated to their shared mentor: "Our Teacher, Leo Strauss." After a bitter fallout, Jaffa would pen a poisonous review suggesting gay men like Bloom deserved to die of AIDS
2. The break-up of the Jaffa/Bloom friendship had more than personal ramifications. It became the focal point of a wider split between the Straussian movement and, ultimately, the Republican Party.
3. Like hip-hop, Straussians are defined by a coastal split. Jaffa's school (West Coast Straussians) have long been aligned with hard right movement conservatism. Bloom's school (East Coast Straussians) gravitate towards the more establishment foreign policy wing of GOP.
4. During the George W. Bush administration much was written (some of it by me) about the East Coast Straussian inflection of foreign policy hawkery. Less notice has been the role West Coast Straussians have played inside Trump administration as ultra-nationalists.
5. The West Coast Straussians say the East Coast Straussians are nihilists. The East Coast Straussians reply the West Coast Straussians are fanatics. My compromise is to recognize both are right.
6. I sat down for a great podcast with @willwilkinson about Leo Strauss, the esoteric and the exoteric, the homosocial and the homoerotic, nihilists & fanatics, & the roots of GOP extremism. jeetheer.substack.com/p/podcast-the-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeet Heer

Jeet Heer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HeerJeet

26 May
1. One strong tendency in Republican Party right now is that it's intensifying two seemingly contradictory tendencies: rhetorical populism ("we're a worker's party") & attempts to gain power as minoritarian party (via voter suppression, gerrymandering, electoral college etc.)
2. Minoritarianism, in various forms, has more of a history in America than I think is commonly acknowledged: the claim that a minority not only has rights to protected from majority but should (by dint of superior culture) govern majority.
3. Right-wing populism of various forms - Tom Watson(s), Coughlin, Wallace - typically squared the circle simply by imagining "the people" in a specific way (as white Christian). But has rarely had truck with the more institutional forms of minority rule (courts, bureaucracy)
Read 5 tweets
25 May
1. So what are we to make of Bill and Jeff's non-excellent adventure? It shows that the "adage the personal is political" has far reaching implications. Image
2. That Bill & Melinda Gates are divorcing is (I assume) sad for them, their family & friends. But not of public interest. That Bill's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein was a factor raises the gossip level. But more than it: it clarifies why the divorce has policy implications.
3. The line from Bill Gates' people is: "Bill only met with Epstein to discuss philanthropy.” Which on the face of it is risible (although some people are buying it & some people say harping on the Epstein stuff is entering in QAnon territory).
Read 7 tweets
23 May
1. This thread makes a compelling case that (alas) the Steinbeck werewolf novel should probably not be published. At the very least it shows how nettlesome and difficult the managing of literary estates is.
2. You would think that once a writer is dead, their literary career is over. That's a mistake. Death can bring with it lots of questions of what should be preserved, what published, what edited, what left to the privacy of the archive.
3. Even seemingly obvious rules ("the author's last wish should govern estate") falls apart in practice. The world is a richer place because the last wishes of Virgil, Emily Dickinson and Kafka (to destroy major works) was disobeyed.
Read 5 tweets
21 May
1. The last 25 years of Philip Roth's are depressing to contemplate. After a bitter divorce, Roth became unmoored: touchy, self-justifying, quick to break with old friends, prone to doomed relationships, eager to find a biographical vindication. His estate continues the folly.
2. There's a weird ouroboros quality to accounts of Roth's last years because they were spent trying to control -- to shape or to resist -- the biographies we're reading. Plus a novel (Exit Ghost) about his alter-ego's fear of a biographer. Snakes eating their tails.
3. Roth wanted a biographer who would refute the account given to him by his ex-wife Claire Bloom. In the process he used one biographer as a sock puppet & broke with him (Ross Miller), stonewalled another (Ira Nadel) & finally settled on Blake Bailey (now accused of rape).
Read 7 tweets
19 May
1. No Drama Obama on the UFOs: "We can't explain how they move, their trajectory. They did not have an easily explainable pattern. And so I think that people still take seriously, trying to investigate and figure out what that is."
Reasonable! But should we be freaking out?
2. As people rightly insist the "u" in UFO just means "unidentified." Doesn't necessarily, or even at any serious degree probably, mean space aliens. Just means there is weird shit flying around all over the world which we can't explain. Which is interesting/worrying.
3. Depending on you rigorously you want to define UFOs, they've been a thing since 1940s, or 1890s, or really the beginning of recorded history. Humans often see things they can't explain! And in vast majority of cases that's just optical illusion and/or delusion.
Read 4 tweets
18 May
1. Fittingly, Philip Roth is posthumously entangled in several overlapping scandals about free speech. Equally fittingly, they are an outgrowth of Roth's characteristic attempt to have extreme control the narrative of his life & the inevitably blowback this produced.
2. I don't think it's sufficiently appreciated how Roth made to engineer a biography that he hoped would vindicate him against the portrait given by his ex-wife Claire Bloom in her memoir.
3. The broad story is Roth wanted a sock puppet official biographer who would voice his side of the story. The first sock puppet (Ross Miller) passive-aggressively resisted & so Roth settled on Blake Bailey. Whose bio overshadowed by sexual assault accusation. Hubris & nemesis.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(