But firstly, this much outraged tweet has multiple inaccuracies.
1. Alleged victim was not the complainant. IO was.
2. I stopped counting after 150 non-victim testimony pages, but the claim is false.
3. If idle enough, may find actual number or comment if anyone else does.
1. Alleged victim was not the complainant. IO was.
2. I stopped counting after 150 non-victim testimony pages, but the claim is false.
3. If idle enough, may find actual number or comment if anyone else does.
https://twitter.com/utkarsh_aanand/status/1397616048103329792
For a general gist:
First 43 pages just describes case and lists accusation, etc cases referenced, blah blah.
+ abundant cases referenced all through.
Dozens describing defense evidence.
Second-last 22 pages are devoted to spanking the IO (+other places)
Finally order
First 43 pages just describes case and lists accusation, etc cases referenced, blah blah.
+ abundant cases referenced all through.
Dozens describing defense evidence.
Second-last 22 pages are devoted to spanking the IO (+other places)
Finally order
Even in the remaining pages, there are other prosecution witnesses, cases and evidence cited, IO spanked, etc.
Judge really doesn't like IO. 22 pages dedicated and detailed spanking.
But still why so much victim dissection? Because much explained in judgment. Some egs:
Judge really doesn't like IO. 22 pages dedicated and detailed spanking.
But still why so much victim dissection? Because much explained in judgment. Some egs:
The judgment doesn't "arrive at" how an educated journalist should..... these are specific comments on specific points and NOT conclusions as is being reported. Will count and post how many pages, context, etc though honestly the pulled/picked up seemed huh?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
