This works well for research, but is not usable for clinical purposes. There are several molecules that are used for mGFR - but all are rather complex
For years we used creatinine as reasonable molecule.
4/ Creatinine clearance involved a 24 hour urine collection with measurement of Pcr and Ucr
Ucr*V/(Pcr * 1440 minutes) - creatinine clearance
But collecting urine for 24 hours is challenging for many patients & the amount of creatinine produced daily is actually very variable.
5/ "Creatinine is a break-down product of creatine phosphate in muscle, and is usually produced at a fairly constant rate by the body (depending on muscle mass)."
The key here is "fairly constant rate"
The challenge of 24 hour collections led researchers to develop eGFR
6/ eGFR is not a number but rather an estimated number. Since the produced creatinine is excreted each day (at least that is the assumption), if we can estimate production we can substitute "creatinine production" for Ucr*Volume.
6/ The first effort at estimating GFR is know as the Cockroft-Gault equation - Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41
7/ They took 24 hour urine collections from male veterans and determined how much creatinine was produced and excreted as a function of age and weight. They then suggested taking 85% for women due to less muscle mass on average.
8/ While this is a reasonable formula (needs adjustments for obesity), one could not automate it, because you need weight in kg.
Creatinine clearance ~ (140 - age)*wt in kg/ (Scr*72)
9/ In order to estimate GFR using computerized medical record, formulas based on age, gender and race (many are now appropriately excluding race from the equation) have appeared. The first of these MDRD came from the Modifying Diet in Renal Disease studies.
10/ More recently we have a variety of CKD-Epi equations using the same variables. These all come for collections of 24 hour urine collections.
11/ For reasons we will discuss below sometimes we substitute (or add) cystatin C to the estimation equations.
All eGFR equations that use creatinine have the same problem - how can we accurately estimate muscle mass?
Cystatin C avoids that problem but is not widely available
12/ Since the creatinine based eGFR equations are assuming standard muscle mass for age and gender, we will have problems with either increased muscle mass or decreased muscle mass.
13/Weightlifters, many football players, etc. will have more creatinine produced and excreted than predicted - thus estimating a lower eGFR
Patients with significant cord injuries, amputations, and sarcopenia (cachexia, anorexia nervosa) will have too high an eGFR estimate.
14/ The next big problem is that the equations assume a stable creatinine. If the creatinine is increasing we should not us eGFR - likewise if the creatinine is decreasing we will have a much too large eGFR.
15/ So what should we do w/ eGFR. First, remember that it is an estimate & beware obvious errors. Second, avoid eGFR w/ changing creatinines. Third, do not base CKD estimates w/o considering other factors. Fourth, consider cystatin C if think muscle mass is too great or low
16/ For more on this topic I recommend these articles:
GFR as the “Gold Standard”: Estimated, Measured, and True ajkd.org/article/S0272-…
17/ Elise Boele-Schutte, Ron T. Gansevoort, Measured GFR: not a gold, but a gold-plated standard, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Volume 32, Issue suppl_2, April 2017, Pages ii180–ii184, doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gf…
18/ Levey, A.S., Coresh, J., Tighiouart, H. et al. Strengths and limitations of estimated and measured GFR. Nat Rev Nephrol 15, 784 (2019). doi.org/10.1038/s41581…
1/ #UncleBob asks you to consider the implications of the famous Nietzsche quote, “There are no facts, only interpretations” These tweets inspired by following @VPrasadMDMPH
We all interpret data differently weighing the risks & benefits.
2/ How else can one explain competing guidelines? Committees look at the same data and make different recommendations. This is the potential flaw in "evidence based medicine".
Confirmation bias influences all these decisions.
3/ The critical care community developed a very aggressive guideline for early treatment of possible sepsis. The ID community left the joint committee and wrote a strong editorial about the risk of over use of antibiotics secondary to this guideline.
#UncleBob is a huge @UVA basketball fan and very proud of our coach Tony Bennett. He took these 5 pillars of our program from his dad (also a great basketball coach. These are very applicable to #MedEd# . ,.,. .
1/ HUMILITY: KNOW WHO WE ARE
Never overestimate our abilities, but do not underestimate them either. Humility is not modesty, rather it involves knowing who you are and never pretending to be more. Avoid narcissism.
2/ Let's start with confusion. Finding information on this is very non-specific but I think this quote helps: High calcium levels can be a catalyst for neuronal demise, possibly due to glutaminergic excitotoxicity and dopaminergic and serotonergic dysfunction.
3/ But colleagues and learners know that I am most interested in the polyuria. I have taught that hypercalcemia can cause nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, but the mechanism was unclear. Let's review how ADH works and then look at an interesting study that suggests an answer.
1/ #UncleBob on treating metabolic acidosis. First, get this article:
Sabatini, S., Kurtzman, N. (2009). Bicarbonate Therapy in Severe Metabolic Acidosis JASN 20(4), 692-695. dx.doi.org/10.1681/asn.20…
2/ Here is the quick chalk talk.
For increased anion gap metabolic acidosis, treat the underlying cause. Do not give bicarbonate unless you have an extraordinarily low pH (debate whether this is < 7.2 or 7.1 or 7. And with DKA, NEVER.
3/ For normal gap metabolic acidosis ALWAYS give bicarbonate with a goal of ~ 22 for the bicarbonate.
How?
Estimate bicarbonate deficit = 22 - current bicarb
Multiply by bicarbonate space = TBW = 50% wt in kg (+/- 10%)
Deliver a succinct HPI - start with chief complaint - insert RELEVANT PMH as desired. Tell the story chronologically if possible. Include related review of systems, social history, health behavior history, medication list as pertinent.
3/ Stop after HPI and we will discuss the HPI. The goal of the discussion is to improve how each learner tells the story. The goal is complete, yet succinct. Don't give too much information. Avoid redundancy. We call this discussion IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK.
Here is the idea - we have an increased anion gap and want to see if the patient also has either a normal gap metabolic acidosis or metabolic alkalosis. Here are the assumptions:
2/ Expected gap = 11 - 2.5*(albumin -4) but that is hard to remember, so we use a reasonable approximation = albumin * 3.
Example, patient has an albumin of 2.3 so we expect a gap of 7.
3/ Second assumption - the increased anion gap has replaced bicarbonate. - thus treating the gap will restore bicarbonate