Spent some time thinking about this thread. At the moment, hard to see how what you call the "militant Ambedkarites" can assimmilate anything. Whatever the reason, lack of trust with other castes, emerging strength... hard to say from the outside, but it is a fortress.
I had brought this up several years before too. I had called it the dalit extreme right. It was not as vocal as it is today, but this insularity, perceived by the most vocal among them as strength also serves to isolate and disempower.
From the outside, it appears identical to Brahminism, except reversed. You aren't good enough unless you are dalit.

The overall social response appears to be to leave them be, and a wariness/unease at the hostility.
The more politically correct among the UC admit they know little, shut their mouths and educate themselves. Others do not care. Either way, the effect seems to be one of "us" and "them". "Them" can be spectators, but not participants.
In that sense the "fortress" serves to keep UCs out as effectively as orthodox temples served to keep dalits out. The concept of "national integration" lost. This, in my view is both a social as well as political problem that @jaiminism described from a different perspective.
@jaiminism From the perspective of an outsider looking in, the "dalit right" or "militant Ambedkarites" wield hostility like a weapon.

A secular person becomes a "savarna savior". The casteism becomes necessary - to both justify own casteism as well as push away "them"
@jaiminism Hindutva extremists have a bigger problem with secular than Muslim extremists, Dalit casteists (for lack of a better word) have a bigger problem with secular than savarna casteists.

Extremes strengthen each other stretching society like a rubber band. The middle is bland.
@jaiminism Yesterday, I had an unnerving experience when a dalit woman I have come to like and respect got asked to disclose her caste by dalit casteists. Not wanting her recognition to be reduced to her caste, she refused. She got treated as an UC by the casteists and was distressed.
@jaiminism I am used to this hostility and it didn't surprise me. I usually begin with disclosing my caste when interacting with dalits, because it is harder to get friendly replies and then insults when your caste is "discovered". It rattled her. She felt alienated from her own people"
@jaiminism To my mind, those were louts, not "her own people" of which there are many who are compassionate and supportive. I got protective of her which made matters worse, because "savarna saviour" + me coming to her defense meant she was savarna.
@jaiminism They were no more "her people" than an UC discriminating on the basis of caste would be "my people"

Much later I was wondering at my reaction. Used to shrugging off savarna slurs by dalit casteists, I was not bothered for myself, but felt rage at the way she was treated for same
@jaiminism To my mind, it raises two big problems.

1. Social inclusion. The concept itself appears excluded. How long can a vulnerable society count on being militant as the answer?

2. Political representation, as @jaiminism was talking about. Implications of this exclusionary view.
@jaiminism I agree with Jaimine that 2022 is important. I don't see how it is possible from a dalit perspective. Mayawati is faced with a big challenge. I don't see how hostility based on caste identity will not hinder getting more dalit focused representation.
@jaiminism And I was pondering this caste system where the victims cling to it just as strongly as perpetrators and those who would offer solidarity and respect regardless of identity are the ones rejected by both.

And what it means. Why it means what it means....
@jaiminism For an example in contrast, it is relatively simple to be friendly with a Muslim or Christian or Sikh or someone from another country.

I posted a tweet drooling about Eid food, got several DMs offering to invite me on a regular basis.
@jaiminism I live in a home where a dalit cooks the food daily and is more than a blood relative grandmother to my child, but if I talked about it here. I'd be called the savarna saviour and get busy defending my existence rather than get food invites.

How do you share a country like this?
@jaiminism I think I have meandered enough.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with You may call me V

You may call me V Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Vidyut

3 Jun
Human rights activist wanted to met about something he was working on. I explained I don't really go to meet people, but he was welcome to come here and we could talk in the garden.

Garden not possible. Power supply.

Ok, so he could come home and we could discuss in my room.
Refused. Apparently since the Tejpal arrest, for seven years, he has avoided meeting ANY WOMAN where his behaviour could be independently verifiable. Claims he works on a lot of causes and one accusation could derail them all. Apparently was attempted. Not sure if real/paranoia.
So I asked what difference it made if I came to his office or he came to my home. If I wanted to frame him, I could just as easily make allegations there.

He replied there are others in his office.

I said there are others in my home too.

He heard that I was suing my ex.
Read 8 tweets
3 Jun
The 'appropriating' someone's voice argument is used so illogically sometimes that it is verging on fallacy.

A person speaking their own perspective is not appropriating anything.

It is an ad hominem attack that also adds false accusation to basically shut someone up.
Regardless of the subject. Even if it is a man speaking on women's rights, savarna speaking on caste discrimination against dalits, corporate rich fellow talking of poverty, whatever.

Own perspective is not appropriation.
OTOH, it is appropriation when someone not from that identity claims to speak what their reality "really" is. Particularly when it contradicts stated reality by that identity. This must be opposed.

The distinction is huge. One is interested participation. Other is suppression.
Read 5 tweets
2 Jun
Brumby update day 6

Ghar wapsi continues. Now with an attempt to help community (his followers) too find a good response to self harm.

Probably gets awkward when they are surprised at his U-turn ImageImageImageImage
So it seems from people who do self harm being attention seekers, we have arrived at a place where Brumby is doing his best to find a better response to self harm that doesn't get him spanked.

Not bad for under a week, eh? Practically transforming as we watch.

Unfollow anyway.
All Brumby ever asked for as per today's version is that you don't glamorize self harm and he is still against wokes. Unclear why, since he appears headed there himself.

Or maybe he is just pretending.

For those puzzled by the Brumby thing, a primer
Read 6 tweets
2 Jun
Was talking to someone who may be in trouble because of disclosing too much to someone she no longer trusts in Twitter DMs.

General guide. Never ever say anything you wouldn't be happy to announce from a stage.

Hormones are the WORST "proof" of trust followed by ideology.
She approached me thinking that I say many bold things, so I would understand why she did what she did.

I say bold things because I am a bold person. My main timeline is actually more 'bold' than any private messages to anyone.
If you find yourself saying something you hope no one comes to know, DON'T. That is the only real way for no one to come to know.

DMs or WA Chats may seem private, but they are not, unless you guarantee the person on the other end will ALWAYS have your trust.
Read 5 tweets
2 Jun
Speaking of which, day 5 of the Brumby project seems to be about ghar wapsi.

Seems he is actually quite sensitive, just opposed to some, puzzling his followers...

Not even a week yet. Not bad.

Screenshots follow.
Followers be confused. So now we are against taunting and harassing suicidal people? Image
So we have some clarification of what he really thinks today... ImageImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets
2 Jun
So I had not really intended to talk about this since the woman in question didn't have a problem.

My reason for speaking up was more that if you're making a space claiming to respect women, then respect them, not trash talk their opinions even after she disagreed first time.
The thing with this not a democracy, my space, my rules thing is that this is exactly what women go through (Which was being discussed just prior). Spaces they live in are usually controlled by men, their opinions are often trashed and their rights can be conditional to approval.
My point was that if he invited her to speak in his space, he owed her the respect of not trashing her opinions.

That said, he was fine after a topic change AND the woman in question did not mind, so it is not my place to object further beyond the space when I was speaking.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(