So I finally read the UN report which allegedly claims the first use of a lethal autonomous weapon system to kill a person. ( undocs.org/S/2021/229)
I must admit, I am still unclear on why this is the news that has gotten so much traction. 🤔
The report states that a convoy in Libya was "hunted down and remotely engaged by the unmanned combat aerial vehicles or the lethal autonomous weapons systems such as the STM Kargu-2 and other loitering munitions."
This story has been picked up by many news outlets now, first (I think) by the New Scientist.
The thing is, how is this the first time of anything? Loitering munition have been on the battlefield for a while - most notably in Nagorno-Karaback. It seems to me that what's new here isn't the event, but that the UN report calls them lethal autonomous weapon systems.
Don't get me wrong - people can be outraged by this, there are efforts to ban LAWS, that's all right and well. I'm just a bit surprised by the framing? Why this event, why now?
A few more thoughts on this.
First, my N-K point was a bit misleading because this event in Libya took place in March 2020, so before N-K. What I meant was that we've been talking about loitering munition on the battlefield already late last year, so what's different now?
But looking at the UN report more closely, I find that the claims that this was the first autonomous weapons kill are becoming even less clear, because the report doesn't say this.
Unless I am missing something, the report simply says: loitering munition was present and used, together with other systems.
It's not even clear whether they are connecting casualties to this weapon system use.
So what I am trying to wrap my head around is why this half paragraph has suddenly become a 'killer robots' headline.
I’m here doing this whole thread, while @drfranksauer only needs one gif. 😅
As I am still in bank holiday spirit, and The New Yorker published this #drone cartoon yesterday, here is a thread with my favourite drone and #AI cartoons, comics, memes etc.
Yesterday, the candidate for chancellor for the German Greens, Annalena Baerbock gave a long recorded interview *on foreign and security policy*.
You can watch it here: baks.bund.de/de/aktuelles/d…
Thread with some things I find noteworthy.
This interview is in and of itself really good news. We *need* to talk more about security and defence policy, and foreign policy in Germany.
Some thoughts on what Baerbock said & how she did (my take, obviously).
Overall, she appeared rather well informed on the relevant topics - though not very concrete in her proposals.
Massive reading recommendation for the German speakers. This article by @berndulrich @DIEZEIT is the best analysis I’ve read so far about Black-Green.
Spoiler: it’s not good.
The report is written by @matthimon who has been working on this for many years (I spoke with him for my PhD research ages ago).
He clearly knows his stuff and the report is a good overview of German #drone capabilities.
A sidenote here: there is little love lost between me and the LINKE but they have been playing a great role in German drone politics through their inquiries (questions to the government). I used these questions and answers extensively in my research. That's just good politics.
Good news for Germany: the German government is highly trusted abroad.
(“Please indicate how much you trust the national government of each of the following countries to do what is right”)
This shows nicely what a fickle and inexact thing ‘trust’ is: Trump voters, after the election in which their candidate lost, suddenly trust US NGOs, the media, and even US business much less.
🤷♀️
What a discussion between German Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU, President of Bundestag) and @GoulardSylvie (LREM, former MEP, former French defence minister)! 😮
Schäuble: „Deutsche wären bereit, auf nationale Armee zu verzichten“ - WELT welt.de/politik/deutsc…
A Franco-German interview that *starts* with questions about security and defence? Where things actually go beyond “we’re striving to create a European Army... eventually”? Pretty neat!
Schäuble: “I regret that the Aachen Treaty did not include more on the cooperation on the military level. That this is missing today wasn’t Paris fault.”