Fire risk assessor reassured TMO that Grenfell cladding "complied with the building regulations" less than two months before the fire
Carl Stokes, who did risk assessments for Grenfell Tower and other buildings in Kensington from 2010 to 2017, was asked to comment on a letter sent by the London Fire Brigade in April 2017 following concerns about a fire in Shepherd's Bush
That fire spread up the building via spandrel panels made of timber of polystyrene and prompted the LFB to "strongly urge" considering the issue of external fire spread in future risk assessments. The email went to RBKC, who forwarded it to the TMO, who forward it to Stokes.
A week later, the head of health and safety at the TMO asks him to comment - saying she does not think they have blocks 'with external cladding of this nature'.
He writes back saying: "Grenfell was clad but the cladding complied with the requirements of building regulations"
He himself says his knowledge of cladding was 'limited' and he was 'not a construction or materials specialist'.
"Why didn't you simply direct her to ask the question of someone who was a specialist advisor in relation to the cladding?" asks counsel to the inquiry
Mr Stokes' explanation is that the fire in Shepherd's Bush was infill panels below windows, not overcladding - so essentially he thought the system at Grenfell was different.
By this point, it has been given a completion certificate by building control and Mr Stokes had been on an informal tour of the site with Rydon. His view is that building control would not have signed it off if it didn't comply.
A couple of other important topics covered this morning, including the smoke extract system. Will have a report at the end of the day.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I may be biased, but personally I think the fight a bereaved Grenfell Tower family are taking to the Home Office to ensure inquiry recommendations covering disabled people are implemented deserves to be news outside the pages of a niche trade magazine...
The nutshell is this: after hearing the evidence of the night of the fire in which many vulnerable people were unable to escape, inquiry chair Sir Martin Moore-Bick said all vulnerable residents of high rises should be offered personal evacuation plans.
But the govt did not offer this. Instead, they said they would be prepared only for buildings where there is known to be dangerous cladding. This was a very clear watering down of the inquiry recommendation and triggered a legal challenge from a bereaved family
The guidance, 'Fire safety in purpose built blocks of flats', was published by the Local Government Association with the backing of govt and had been key in the social housing sector's approach to fire safety. But the LGA took it down earlier this year.
It has become controversial because it plays down the need for evacuation plans for disabled residents and encourages reliance on 'stay put'. The Grenfell Tower Inquiry has already recommended the development of plans to evacuate buildings.
Former council leader dismisses Grenfell resident concerns about social cleansing as 'ludicrous' and insists all residents were guaranteed to return to regenerated estates, before being shown his own council's policy contradicting this
Nicholas Paget Brown was asked about a meeting he held with Eddie Daffarn and other Grenfell Tower residents in September 2013. Mr Daffarn had raised several concerns - including about power surges and fears of 'social cleansing' on refurbished estates.
Mr Daffarn's concern over the latter was rooted in what he called the council's "fascist decant policy", which he said did not guarantee residents of estates demolished for regeneration would return (such regen was at that point loosely considered for Grenfell)
Rock Feilding-Mellen did not ask key questions in fire brigade guidance for councillors, despite specific warning that they should not "assume" that matters are being dealt with appropriately
Second day of evidence for Rock Feilding-Mellon, former deputy leader and cabinet member for housing at RBKC. Among several topics covered this morning he was asked about these policy documents, which he was sent in July 2014:
They are guides for councillors about fire safety, produced by the London Fire Brigade following the Lakanal House fire in 2009. Feilding-Mellen says he "thinks he had heard" of Lakanal, but had not read the coroner's report. He was emailed these guides by the director of housing
Update from this morning at the Grenfell Tower Inquiry:
RBKC officer asked about lack of scrutiny over fire door self-closers and evacuation plans for company that managed Grenfell Tower
This morning we've been hearing from Amanda Johnson, former head of housing commissioning at RBKC. One of her main jobs was to scrutinise the performance of KCTMO, the council-owned company which managed the housing in the borough.
Asked about the programme of fire risk assessments in the borough, she was shown an enforcement notice issued to Adair Tower after a fire in 2015, which noted (among other things) missing self closers on front doors. Was she surprised by this?
In October, Scottish Tories did not vote on extending free school meals because it was English legislation.
But they made an exception last month to help the govt vote down an amendment to protect English leaseholders from paying cladding costs: insidehousing.co.uk/news/campaigne…
English Votes for English laws rule has been suspended for pandemic. But Scottish Conservatives said they would respect it anyway after being criticised for not voting for free school meals in October
But in March all six Scottish Conservatives including leader Douglas Ross helped vote down an amendment to the Fire Safety Bill which had sought to protect leaseholders from paying for cladding remediation. This legislation only applies to England. Here's their explanation: