Sexual perversion is morally wrong. 
Kant
It is a wonder that sodomy was so quickly granted ethical status in the Western world.
It goes
1 Being a sodomite is just being gay [It’s not]
2 Being gay is JUST LIKE being black [It’s not]
3 So, being gay entitles one to civil rights JUST LIKE being black It [doesn’t]
1 Being a sodomite is just being gay [It’s not]
2 Being gay is JUST LIKE being black [It’s not]
3 So, being gay entitles one to civil rights JUST LIKE being black It [doesn’t]
An excellent proof that “sexual orientation” was always just a ghost concept made up to anchor the proposed rights of sodomites as analogous to RACE is the ease which “sexual orientation” has been utterly transformed by gender ideology.
“Lesbian” *now means* a “feminine gendered person who is attracted to feminine gendered persons”, so either a male or man or female or women who is attracted to any of: male, man, female, woman, so long as both are gender-identified “feminine.”
A lesbian MUST BE attracted to “trans women” BY DEFINITION.
By the trans definition.
But if “sexual orientation” were profound inner reality we were assured it was, could it be CHANGED by words?
By the trans definition.
But if “sexual orientation” were profound inner reality we were assured it was, could it be CHANGED by words?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
