1/ Thread.

Here's why the Prime Minister is wrong when he says the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) is the right place to review the breaches of national security at the government's National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg.

#cdnpoli
2/ NSICOP was created by Bill C-22 in the 42nd Parliament.

Unlike the UK's Intelligence and Security Committee, it's not a committee of parliament, but a committee of parliamentarians. In fact, it's a committee of the executive branch and accountable to the PM.

#cdnpoli
3/ Committee members are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Prime Minister, including the chair.

In other words, the PM can hire and fire NSICOP members at will - they work for him.

It's written right into the Act.

#cdnpoli
4/ Furthermore, government ministers have the right to terminate the committee's reviews and have the right deny the committee information.

In addition, the PM has the power to review and demand revisions to reports before they are made public.

It's all in the Act.

#cdnpoli
5/ NSICOP is accountable to the gov't - not the other way around.

When the gov't fails to uphold national security, it must be held accountable.

The gov't is accountable to the House of Commons. That's why these breaches must be investigated by the House, not NSICOP.

#cdnpoli

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Chong 🇨🇦

Michael Chong 🇨🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MichaelChongMP

22 Jan
1/ Dans un esprit constructif, voici mes conseils à
@JustinTrudeau pour son premier appel avec le président Biden demain.

#polcan
2/ Trouver un moyen de faire avancer le projet KXL. Préciser que le pétrole canadien est produit selon les normes environnementales les plus élevées au monde. Indiquer clairement notre point de vue: ce serait une perte sur le plan environnemental et pour notre reprise économique.
3/ Dans ce contexte, demander l’appui du Président pour explorer la possibilité d’une stratégie énergétique nord-américaine qui inclurait les énergies traditionnelles -pétrole, gaz- et les nouvelles formes d’énergie renouvelable, ainsi que les réseaux de transport d’électricité.
Read 9 tweets
22 Jan
1/ In the spirit of being constructive, here is my advice to @JustinTrudeau for his first call with President Biden tomorrow.

#cdnpoli
2/ Find a way for the KXL project to move forward. Make clear that Canadian oil is produced to the highest environmental standards in the world. Clearly indicate Canada's view that this cancellation is a loss for Canada's environmental plan and our economic recovery.
3/ In that context, ask for the President’s support to explore the possibility of an integrated North American energy strategy that would include traditional forms of energy, such as oil and gas, and newer forms of renewable energy, as well as electrical transmission grids.
Read 9 tweets
20 Jun 19
1/ I strongly oppose any reinstatement of hate speech in the Canadian Human Rights Act. It would be too big a restriction on free speech in a free & democratic society.

I seconded & voted for Bill C-304, which removed hate speech from the Act.

#cdnpoli
nationalpost.com/wcm/de7aeec1-6…
2/ Bill C-304 removed Section 13, the hate speech provision, from the Act. It passed into law in 2013.

Among others, Bill C-304 was supported by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, B’nai Brith and the Toronto Star (Editorial, December 15, 2011).

#cdnpoli
3/ The right way to counter hate speech is through free speech, not human rights codes.

Using human rights codes to counter hate speech is an overly expansive interpretation of the harm principle.

#cdnpoli
Read 12 tweets
3 Apr 19
1/ The rule of law, once again, has been undermined by PM Trudeau and the Liberal government with MP Wilson-Raybould’s and MP Philpott’s expulsion from caucus.

Here's why.

#cdnpoli

cbc.ca/news/politics/…
2/ On November 5, 2015, Section 49 of the Parliament of Canada Act required Liberal MPs to vote four times. These four votes were to be recorded (just like votes are recorded in the House of Commons). Here's the law:
3/ But, the PM and his leadership team prevented Liberal MPs from complying with Section 49 at that first caucus meeting. By blocking Liberal MPs from recorded votes, they acted illegally and broke the law.

One of the recorded votes that didn't occur was for caucus expulsions.
Read 10 tweets
7 Mar 19
1/ Many constituents have been asking me, what did the PM do wrong? And why is this a constitutional crisis? I’ll try to lay it out as best and simply as I can.

Canada’s constitution, our most basic law, is both written and unwritten.
2/ The written constitution is found in various constitution acts. Most well-known are the Constitution Act, 1867 (formerly the British North America Act, 1867) and the Constitution Act, 1982 (containing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms).
3/ But much of our constitution is unwritten. “Constitutional conventions” are part of our unwritten constitution. One unwritten constitutional convention is called the “Shawcross doctrine” or “Shawcross principle”.
Read 18 tweets
8 Feb 19
1/ According to precedent, the A-G is NOT bound by solicitor-client privilege. If asked, the A-G must provide the House of Commons the advice she gave to the government. There's a precedent for this, and it’s recent: Brexit #cdnpoli

cbc.ca/news/politics/…
2/ This past fall, the British government would not release the legal advice from UK A-G Geoffrey Cox regarding Brexit. UK A-G Cox also refused to release the legal advice he provided to the government.

theguardian.com/politics/2018/…

thetimes.co.uk/article/law-ch…
3/ On Dec. 3, 2018, Speaker Bercow ruled the government was likely in contempt of the Commons. The next day, the Commons voted to hold the government in contempt. The gov’t and A-G Cox then released the advice publicly.

independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(