What was the largest wedge issue that polarized the US electorate so severely, that rational thought and critical thinking were abandoned by many on the left, resulting in demoralized apathy (refusal to vote) or emotionally charged protest vote for Trump?
It was Black Lives Matter movement being weaponized by Russian trolls performing active measures on unwitting American progressives & conservatives. Aggravated extreme positions were amplified about racial animus on the right and social justice on the left.
And it’s a key strategy used by cooperating far right and far left political operatives to polarize the electorate into an emotion frenzy, where critical thought takes a back seat during voter decision making.
That strategy is the Finkelstein Method.
And, as I suspected, NDP and GPC are employing this method to gain political support and demoralize progressive voters to induce apathy or enrage them so vehemently about policies most misunderstand.
This is a well documented strategy.
Left and right libertarians used climate change, Proportional Representation and First Nations issues, in that order of priority in the lead up to the 2019 federal election.
Two years later, and after more fake scandals propagated by both right (Poilievre) and left (Angus) over WE and PM Trudeau and his family and accusations of false feminist beliefs (CAF sex abuse scandal), the opposition pundits are amplifying lies about Reconciliation efforts.
Remarkably predictable. Entirely false information. Morally reprehensible behaviour by opposition parties seeking to cash in on a nation’s grief over policies that almost wiped out indigenous people.
Manipulation of indigenous people deeply impacted by a 500 year effort to exterminate them has got to be one of the most callous and deplorable behaviours possible. Well, other than the actual genocidal attempts.
However, manipulation of those suffering from a systematic attempt to eliminate them on an individual and collective basis is probably next on the list of evil intent.
This is not meant as a partisan endorsement of any party. I’ve seen Liberals do the same.
But it’s not a coordinated and organized effort.
STOP USING INDIGENOUS GRIEF AS A POLITICAL WEDGE ISSUE.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Using words like hypocrisy is a reflection of your values, not theirs.
They don’t believe your opinion matters. Therefore hypocrisy is an empty moral value.
Why people continue to use is frustrating.
To respond to the slight of being called a hypocrite, you first must possess some level of a sense of social cohesion and egalitarianism. A belief that “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander” mentality.
How many people are familiar with the following truth?
“Those who don’t know their history are doomed to repeat it.” ~ Edmund Burke
Most people assume Burke was referencing maintaining awareness of history to avoid sliding into autocracy.
He wasn’t. He was referencing the French Revolution. Where the common folk deposed the monarchy & noble classes. And redistributed wealth and resources more equitably.
In theory anyway (check out Robespierre).
Burke was a wealthy aristocrat. Afraid of losing his status, property and comfortable lifestyle.
And he was correct. When you don’t pay attention to current events & seek to understand them in contexts with past events, you’re doomed.
A request to fund a comprehensive search for buried children on and around indigenous residential schools was made by the TRC and denied by Indian Affairs Minister Chuck Strahl in 2009.
@Sarinafull@TheRealDenene@JoeBlowCarSeat@GlobeDebate@sunshinny I wish you would look into legal precedent and why it is so important for governments to retain the authority for deciding the criteria and for new govts to not overrule past government’s decisions.
Precedent is the basis for the rule of law. We must preserve the rule of law.
First we have G&M setting the premise. Laying the groundwork that treatment of indigenous people in Canada has been horrific.
It has. And still is.
Then we have two opposing polarized comments following to evoke an emotional response.
Truly this disgusts me.
Using dead children for political opportunistic messaging is repulsive and morbid.
A bot offers far right inflammatory rhetoric to accompany the opinion piece. The left opposition uses that toxic rhetoric as a foil. It’s really quite demoralizing and sad.