How many people are familiar with the following truth?

“Those who don’t know their history are doomed to repeat it.” ~ Edmund Burke
Most people assume Burke was referencing maintaining awareness of history to avoid sliding into autocracy.

He wasn’t. He was referencing the French Revolution. Where the common folk deposed the monarchy & noble classes. And redistributed wealth and resources more equitably.
In theory anyway (check out Robespierre).

Burke was a wealthy aristocrat. Afraid of losing his status, property and comfortable lifestyle.

And he was correct. When you don’t pay attention to current events & seek to understand them in contexts with past events, you’re doomed.
The French Revolution opened the door for other commoners to challenge the absolute power of monarchy. Along with its accompanying removal of the nobles and redistribution of their land and resources.

Most of Europe removed or curtailed absolute monarchies by mid 19th century.
The French Revolution started a literal social revolution where the common citizen refused absolute authority over their lives.

Burke was the architect who designed the system that preserved aristocratic power under threat of actual democracy.
So when you see that quote, you should understand the context in which it was made.

Burke was warning fellow aristocrats in the British Empire, that their future power and wealth hoarding was dependent upon designing a political system ...
... that functioned as a democracy to the observer, but actually maintained the established patriarchal hierarchy that gave aristocrats their power and wealth.

Edmund Burke is known as the father of modern conservatism. Stephen Harper is an ardent fan. So is Jason Kenney.
Burke revered the status quo of “ordered liberty” that venerated Christian faith and its morals based ideology, the established hierarchy and the desire to keep it that way.

That’s conservatism. That’s where conservative beliefs originate.
Burke was a Whig, a classic liberal. What we would recognize contemporaneously as a far right libertarian with strong connection to religious faith and morals.

Or more colloquially, a social conservative

But Burke’s observations are no less correct for modern citizens.
If you don’t know history, you’re doomed to repeat it. Because those with power aspirations who do study history will use history to inform contemporary political decisions.

Which they are.

While the public is mostly oblivious.
How many know the British Empire’s conquest of French Canada was the impetus for the American revolution in 1776? Taxes to cover the debt of war with France for control of Canada.

Burke was there. Arguing taxation was slavery.

theimaginativeconservative.org/2017/10/edmund…
So what is the ordered liberty Burke prescribes? What does it look like?

If you read Burke’s opines in the below screen shots, you’ll recognize the rhetoric. It’s still used today by modern conservatives. Ordered liberty, natural law, adherence to prudent status quo.
Modern conservatism is shaped by the philosophical struggle of one man’s personal rationale regarding liberty and moral restraint.

To Burke, liberty was only possible in a well defined moral environment.

Otherwise it was too dangerous to allow oneself to act freely.
He applied this philosophy to his own personal life, but petitioned for its adoption by the like minded to limit the liberty of advocates of actual independent thought.

Burke sought to restrict power and liberty to the privileged class.

Don’t let the dim anywhere near power.
He proclaimed the state incapable of proper wealth redistribution, and permanently assigned the underclasses to poverty, social immobility and ordered liberty.

The poor were savages, human capital to be kept from real power and left to their own defences or faith based charity.
This is paleolibertarianism.

Paleo meaning ancient or from a long ago past.

And libertarian meaning those who believe in self regulation, small govt, faith based morality constraints and free markets.
Except when Burke wrote about it, it wasn’t paleo. He developed the concepts to legitimize aristocratic power and to maintain it in the control of the elite few.

Burk’s philosophical reaction to the French Revolution has influenced millions of lives for quite a few centuries.
It wasn’t John A. MacDonald that shaped this nation, anymore than it was George Washington who shaped America.

It was the aristocratic fear, convinced of their own superiority, but recognizing freedom for all would limit their power to accumulate wealth & control politics.
JAM wasn’t a great man, or a great leader. He was a typical gentry class Scot protecting his and his peers economic & social power.

Encouraged by the writings of other men who recognized the power the commons actually possessed. Suppressing that power is called ORDERED LIBERTY.
We don’t need to “cancel” JAM.

We need to delegitimize the belief system that governance should be limited to the rich and powerful.

MacDonald is irrelevant. Kenney misdirects the rage of the commons by focussing on JAM.

He shouts “squirrel” & people start looking around.
Please stop chasing squirrels. Please stop proving Burke’s observation correct. Look up some history.

At least attempt to understand how and why conservatives are making a desperate claim of all authority and political power.

It’s because we WERE winning the war.
Progressives certainly aren’t winning now.

Most are extremely emotionally overwrought and reacting in vengeance without much critical thought. Like the mobs Robespierre used to “cancel” any dissenters to his radical liberty movement.

Declaring all who disagreed an enemy.
There’s a reason Burke was afraid. Robespierre was a power hungry despot himself.

Sure he advocated freedom for all. But he limited freedom to those who supported him fully.

Despots emerge from both ends of the spectrum.

An important lesson from the study of history.
Jacobins were the original cancel culture. Using populist rhetoric, they instituted The Terror that resulted in many unnecessary deaths.

Cancel culture on the left is along these same veins. The elimination of those who question self appointed enforcers of liberty.
The point is: learn your history. Your political beliefs weren’t developed out of thin air. Someone has carefully thought through them in the past, wrote them down and others propagated their widespread existence and they influence us today.

It’s not a horseshoe, it’s history.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sunshiny

Sunshiny Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sunnshiiny

3 Jun
I see so many people using the word hypocrisy to describe this behaviour.

It’s not hypocrisy. They honestly believe the rules do not apply to them.

These are people who believe they write the rules, not live by the rules, because they’re at the top of the hierarchy.
Using words like hypocrisy is a reflection of your values, not theirs.

They don’t believe your opinion matters. Therefore hypocrisy is an empty moral value.

Why people continue to use is frustrating.
To respond to the slight of being called a hypocrite, you first must possess some level of a sense of social cohesion and egalitarianism. A belief that “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander” mentality.

UCP members don’t have that characteristic.
Read 9 tweets
2 Jun
It literally disgusts me that some on the left are using dead children as political fodder.

What kind of person does that?!

I don’t want to know the answer. But I do know it creates deepening of wedges based on race.
Read 18 tweets
1 Jun
A request to fund a comprehensive search for buried children on and around indigenous residential schools was made by the TRC and denied by Indian Affairs Minister Chuck Strahl in 2009.

Denied by Conservative Party of Canada.
The request was approved in early 2016 by the Liberal Party of Canada. Further related funding was included in the 2019 budget.
Additional funding has been made available for commemorative projects.
Read 8 tweets
1 Jun
As an indigenous person, reconciliation is of great importance to me.

I need people to hear this plea. I need people to share this information.

With everyone they know.

I’m asking for the attached thread to be amplified widely.
Inter-generational grief and trauma is not something we can gloss over in a news cycle.

It’s not a quick fix “yep I support reconciliation” so let’s move on to the next topic. Healing occurs at the rate of those requiring healing.

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1399485…
It’s disrespectful to the process & the healing required to rush this process by immediately seeking a solution.

We need to sit in the anguish and experience the discomfort as a nation.

To move on without respecting the process is a rejection of reconciliation.
Read 22 tweets
31 May
@Sarinafull @TheRealDenene @JoeBlowCarSeat @GlobeDebate @sunshinny I wish you would look into legal precedent and why it is so important for governments to retain the authority for deciding the criteria and for new govts to not overrule past government’s decisions.

Precedent is the basis for the rule of law. We must preserve the rule of law.
@Sarinafull @TheRealDenene @JoeBlowCarSeat @GlobeDebate @sunshinny One governing party changing the criteria opens the door to future new governments doing the same.

Which defeats the purpose of the rule of law if new govts can just override a past govt’s legislation and decision making.
@Sarinafull @TheRealDenene @JoeBlowCarSeat @GlobeDebate @sunshinny That’s the reason for some people being excluded for restitution and refusing to change the criteria.

Because it undermines all LPC legislation in the future. Not that it would stop CPC from reversing LPC policy and legislation.
Read 10 tweets
31 May
Interesting development from G&M opinion.

Classic Finkelstein Method being used to polarize the electorate.

On the backs of 215 dead indigenous children in unmarked graves.

That’s political opportunism at its worst.

Sickeningly gross.
First we have G&M setting the premise. Laying the groundwork that treatment of indigenous people in Canada has been horrific.

It has. And still is.

Then we have two opposing polarized comments following to evoke an emotional response.

Truly this disgusts me.
Using dead children for political opportunistic messaging is repulsive and morbid.

A bot offers far right inflammatory rhetoric to accompany the opinion piece. The left opposition uses that toxic rhetoric as a foil. It’s really quite demoralizing and sad.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(