1. A decent amount of people were confused about this tweet yesterday, so I’ll explain:

It’s late 2016. Obama is still in office. The IC, Democrats, and the media are fairly determined to investigate Trump criminally, to build a case based on innuendo, selective leaks, and lies.
2. The case is that Don Trump teamed up with Vlad Putin to hack Podesta and the DNC’s emails and then leak them strategically in order to win the election for Trump, all while managing to avoid the most sophisticated surveillance apparatus mankind has ever known. (The NSA et al)
3. I know, it’s absurd on its face. Trump is smart, but he is not a Bond villain.

In any case, as a result, Trump camp has declared war on the Deep State. His chosen horseman for that war: Mike Flynn.

Yes, it is Flynn who will protect and guide Trump as he plumbs the Deep State
4. Flynn’s efforts to protect the president-elect resulted in two phone calls to Kislyak, the Russian diplomat in the US and a seasoned spy.

And this is where “the plan” loses me.

If you’re a spymaster, as many of the most ardent MAGAs insist Flynn was, why on earth
5. Would you call a bugged phone line amid this particular context? You’re taking office in four weeks. This phone call was essentially a call to James Clapper and John Brennan.

Flynn’s first stunning move to guide Trump in reform of the IC was to …
6. Gift wrap himself for it? Serve himself up on a platter?

As we all know now that call became the focal point for a sophisticated and coordinated operation against the Trump admin in its infancy.

It contributed in large part to the massive tension between Comey and Trump.
7. One might even argue, without much of a stretch, that Team Trump emerges much sooner from the Russia hoax if not for those phone calls.

Without Flynn for Comey to dangle over Trump’s head, that’s one less piece of leverage, and probably one less makes a lot of difference.
8. Mostly, I cannot emphasize this enough: If Flynn did not know a phone call to Kislyak was a phone call to Brennan, Clapper and the entire IC, he did not deserve to be Trump’s chosen horseman. Just the opposite.

You don’t deliberately offer yourself up as sacrifice to
9. The same apparatus that is hellbent on using everything + the kitchen sink to destroy you.

It was spycraft of the poorest level and they exploited it to full effect.

A seasoned intel operator says “fuck no, I’m not phoning that guy, are you folks even paying attention?”
10. And what did we really gain from the calls? What were the upsides? What was said then that couldn’t have been said later without much loss?

I’m still struggling to figure it out.
Last: Important not to forget though, the substance of the calls doesn’t matter. The legality of the calls doesn’t matter.

The call itself is all that matters because at that point, you have put yourself and the NSC and Trump at the whim of a merciless and dishonest “deep state”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Geoffrey Ingersoll

Geoffrey Ingersoll Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GPIngersoll

3 Jun
1. To demonstrate my own, as an example, the first conversation about gain of function I had was May 1, 2020. It led me down a month's long rabbit hole researching highly technical papers. Sometimes it took me a week or more to read and fully understand 10 pages.
I did not actually pitch a story on it until first week of Jan.

I would love to say I was ahead of everyone. I wasn't. We did some reporting on lab leak, but we didn't get really aggressive on it until recently.

A lot of that is my fault. I was trepidatious.
I didn't fully understand. My assumptions about how the research worked turned out to be true, but I didn't truly understand.

Sure as shit didn't help matters that NO ONE in the field was willing to talk about it. One or two, I understand, but dozens of emails going unanswered.
Read 4 tweets
3 Jun
Reading the Vanity Fair story and a bunch of things jump out at me just concerning the mythology of early 2020.

Many in establishment and corporate media have been blaming Trump for their own efforts to suppress lab leak hypothesis.

It’s odd. It reads like TDS. Image
Do your fucking brains shut off when Trump talks? Does the sound of his voice negate all ability to reason?

Trump’s “racism” in this case was just a reactionary response to wider media and elite institutions adopting Pro China postures and Chinese propaganda wholesale. Image
When every major institution is saying, you’re not allowed to say the virus came from China because it’s racist — within earshot of Chinese operatives saying the exact same thing — well obviously Donald Trump of all people is going to call it “China virus.”

The response here …
Read 18 tweets
1 Jun
Take notes, everyone, this is how political stratcom operatives use media for damage control ...

cnn.com/2021/06/01/pol…
Command messaging high up in the story, probably almost word for word what the Harris team wanted to convey.

I wonder if Biden gave her clearance for this or if her office is freelancing
lol, nothing quite like being on deep background ("sources") to praise your boss.
Read 6 tweets
30 May
One thing I will never forget:

We are having this conversation exactly a year late because the media wanted to make sure Biden won the election.
The irony is that Trump probably would have lost anyway, but the fact remains, any line of inquiry remotely perceived as beneficial to Trump had to be stamped out … and anyone willing to pursue it was treated as an insane pariah AND viciously suppressed on social media.
The last part is what annoys me most. It’s not just that American media mimicked Chinese propaganda, it’s that the fact checking apparatus was eager to enforce the orthodoxy.

And it wasn’t for lack of information. Don’t let them gaslight you. Not very much info has changed.
Read 19 tweets
20 Apr
The assault on language in the name of “inclusivity” or sensitivity is really just about making language so imprecise that regular people can no longer speak truth.

Not a mistress, but a companion. Not a riot if it’s a mostly peaceful protest. Not illegal, just undocumented.
And if you want to get really down into the guts of the matter, please take notice that every mandated change in language is not only more muddled, but it takes LONGER to even say.

If the base outcome of the change is to obfuscate and belabor language, then it seems clear that
the people enforcing the change find the subject to be either one of much personal discomfort or just plain inconvenient to their goals, usually the latter under the shrill guise of the former.

Don’t call them illegal aliens, you bigot, these words literally hurt me!
Read 17 tweets
1 Apr
I’d be willing to bet that I’m among less than one percent of senior editors/reporters in national politics 40> who has voted for both parties.

Why does it matter?
Well because as local papers dry up, journalism increasingly stovepipes. Similar academic pipelines form similar people going to the surviving corporate media companies that all have similar interests.
The web has also divided national political media into two concentrated competing forces.

On one hand, you have the conservative commentariat. On the other, about 8-12 journalism institutions barely holding on to objectivity as wokists steadily takeover their newsrooms.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(