Reading the Vanity Fair story and a bunch of things jump out at me just concerning the mythology of early 2020.
Many in establishment and corporate media have been blaming Trump for their own efforts to suppress lab leak hypothesis.
It’s odd. It reads like TDS.
Do your fucking brains shut off when Trump talks? Does the sound of his voice negate all ability to reason?
Trump’s “racism” in this case was just a reactionary response to wider media and elite institutions adopting Pro China postures and Chinese propaganda wholesale.
When every major institution is saying, you’re not allowed to say the virus came from China because it’s racist — within earshot of Chinese operatives saying the exact same thing — well obviously Donald Trump of all people is going to call it “China virus.”
The response here …
Should not ever literally be: Well we were just being reactionary because Trump was reactionary to us propagating Chinese talking points.
How obscene and bile inducing.
We were immature and irrational and incapable of higher brain thought because TRUMP … is the story?
It’s just sick. It’s a sickness. That first before treading in touchy areas you must render genuflection to the all god TDS, else find yourself put out of polite society.
Why in the world would the president saying the US has intel it came from a lab — which it did! — be “bomb throwing”?
Terrible that Asian people were under assault, I’m both not excusing that behavior and not excusing its use as a justification to annihilate open inquiry.
Let’s be perfectly honest: The media, elite & govt institutions did not want the inquiry because it would take focus off of Trump in an election yr
When China called it “racist,” they played all of you goddamn fools (You think China gives a fuck about “racism”? Holy shit, guys).
They also didn’t want it — as Vanity Fair and others have covered well since coming out of the TDS daze — because the trail led back to Dr. Fauci and Co!
The NIH, Dept of State, and other Americans and American institutions are implicated!
So, please, dear god … stop with this “racist Trump prevented us” nonsense. You had your reasons, China handed them to you, Trump reacted. There was no higher benevolence here. It was deliberate, stifling and oppressive and it cost us a ton of time.
This really is just the worst kind of elitist negging.
This guy asked a question — perhaps he wasn’t entirely accurate — but the thrust of his inquiry was literally A YEAR ahead of Vanity Fair.
How do they refer to that moment? In the most condescending way possible.
The reaction should rather be embarrassment and contrition. Not self righteousness. At the very least, if someone that far beneath your capacity was on the right trail a year before you, the least you’d demonstrate is a degree of humility.
1Meanwhile, as we’re yelling about imaginary reasons for why we failed as an industry to piece together publicly available information on the world’s most pressing mystery, we note something major for which Trump IS TO BLAME, but do so in such muted tones that it might go missed.
2. The WHO mission was in part — large part — a failure because Trump was too busy insisting he won an election that he did not win.
They literally cannot help themselves but to neg, condescend and insinuate racism for everything they don’t discover themselves. There is nothing “alt right” about the idea that the PLA might be weaponizing viruses. The DoD has run war games on that assumption.
*sigh* such a predictable equation
Guys, everyone who disagrees with your orthodoxy, whether its lab leak or economic policy … does not require implications that they are racist.
Glad to see China — the most racist country on earth that’s running literal concentration camps right now — escaped the kind of haughty insinuations rife throughout this piece in this tiny little nugget of blame they received from VF.
If you think everyone who was right before you is racist, maybe they were just right and you’re fucking brain damaged.
Mostly it's just sad that such a comprehensive piece has to be marred with cheap potshots. There have been a number of good in-depth pieces that also highlighted Trump's lightning rod role in the investigation, and none this shameless and self righteous.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. To demonstrate my own, as an example, the first conversation about gain of function I had was May 1, 2020. It led me down a month's long rabbit hole researching highly technical papers. Sometimes it took me a week or more to read and fully understand 10 pages.
I did not actually pitch a story on it until first week of Jan.
I would love to say I was ahead of everyone. I wasn't. We did some reporting on lab leak, but we didn't get really aggressive on it until recently.
A lot of that is my fault. I was trepidatious.
I didn't fully understand. My assumptions about how the research worked turned out to be true, but I didn't truly understand.
Sure as shit didn't help matters that NO ONE in the field was willing to talk about it. One or two, I understand, but dozens of emails going unanswered.
1. A decent amount of people were confused about this tweet yesterday, so I’ll explain:
It’s late 2016. Obama is still in office. The IC, Democrats, and the media are fairly determined to investigate Trump criminally, to build a case based on innuendo, selective leaks, and lies.
2. The case is that Don Trump teamed up with Vlad Putin to hack Podesta and the DNC’s emails and then leak them strategically in order to win the election for Trump, all while managing to avoid the most sophisticated surveillance apparatus mankind has ever known. (The NSA et al)
3. I know, it’s absurd on its face. Trump is smart, but he is not a Bond villain.
In any case, as a result, Trump camp has declared war on the Deep State. His chosen horseman for that war: Mike Flynn.
Yes, it is Flynn who will protect and guide Trump as he plumbs the Deep State
The irony is that Trump probably would have lost anyway, but the fact remains, any line of inquiry remotely perceived as beneficial to Trump had to be stamped out … and anyone willing to pursue it was treated as an insane pariah AND viciously suppressed on social media.
The last part is what annoys me most. It’s not just that American media mimicked Chinese propaganda, it’s that the fact checking apparatus was eager to enforce the orthodoxy.
And it wasn’t for lack of information. Don’t let them gaslight you. Not very much info has changed.
The assault on language in the name of “inclusivity” or sensitivity is really just about making language so imprecise that regular people can no longer speak truth.
Not a mistress, but a companion. Not a riot if it’s a mostly peaceful protest. Not illegal, just undocumented.
And if you want to get really down into the guts of the matter, please take notice that every mandated change in language is not only more muddled, but it takes LONGER to even say.
If the base outcome of the change is to obfuscate and belabor language, then it seems clear that
the people enforcing the change find the subject to be either one of much personal discomfort or just plain inconvenient to their goals, usually the latter under the shrill guise of the former.
Don’t call them illegal aliens, you bigot, these words literally hurt me!
I’d be willing to bet that I’m among less than one percent of senior editors/reporters in national politics 40> who has voted for both parties.
Why does it matter?
Well because as local papers dry up, journalism increasingly stovepipes. Similar academic pipelines form similar people going to the surviving corporate media companies that all have similar interests.
The web has also divided national political media into two concentrated competing forces.
On one hand, you have the conservative commentariat. On the other, about 8-12 journalism institutions barely holding on to objectivity as wokists steadily takeover their newsrooms.