1) Almost 90% APR on $BTC with hardly any risk of impermanent loss... This is fully boosted return on mBTC/HBTC pool on @mStable_. Boost requires to lock some $MTA but lock terms are more favorable than trying to get max boost on Curve by locking $CRV. See 🧵 for more details.
2) Let's first explain what mAssets are. They are meta-stablecoins based on baskets of pegged tokens. mUSD is USD stablecoin which can be minted by depositing sUSD, DAI, USDC or USDT into the basket. mBTC is pegged to BTC and is backed by a pool of renBTC, WBTC and sBTC.
3) Feeder Pools are liquidity pools that contain two assets: 50% of mAsset (mUSD or mBTC) and 50% of any other pegged asset (BUSD/GUSD for mUSD, HBTC/TBTC for mBTC). They are similar to pools on Curve which pair "exotic" stables (e.g. $lUSD, $alUSD) with 3pool (USDT+USDC+DAI).
4) mAssets (mUSD, mBTC) serve as liquidity bridge between other assets in Feeder Pools (fPools) and underlying assets in the mStable's baskets. If you want to swap HBTC to WBTC, mBTC is a bridge between HBTC/mBTC pool and mBTC basket of WBTC, renBTC, sBTC.
5) "But sir. You promised 90% APR on BTC, not a lecture on mStable...". Fair enough. Let's get into it. Liquidity providers for fPools are incentivized with $MTA rewards. Base APR is 17.5% for mBTC/TBTC and 29.5% for mBTC/HBTC. But base APR can be increased 3x - up to almost 90%!
6) For rewards boost, you need to stake $MTA in governance contract. In return, you get vMTA - your voting power which also allows you to participate in the governance. While staking you choose the duration of the lockup period - the longer the period, the more vMTA you get.
7) For example, 1000 MTA staked for 2 days, will give you 5.5 vMTA. Max lockup (17 weeks) - 320.5 vMTA. 17 weeks is a lot of time, especially in crypto, but during lockup you also earn 20% on your stake in a form of extra $MTA rewards.
8) To check how much vMTA is needed to boost rewards on fPools, you can use Earning Power Calculator on the app. It shows the rewards multiplier you get for a given amount of vMTA and fPool LP tokens. Let's imagine you have 1 WBTC and want to deposit it to mStable...
9) Adding 1 WBTC to mBTC/HBTC fPool vault will give you about 0.998 LP tokens. For max boost, you need 6277 vMTA - that's about 19600 $MTA staked for 17 weeks. In other words, to earn 90% APR on 1 BTC deposit ($37k), you need about $19k worth of $MTA locked for 17 weeks.
10) Locked $MTA is worth more than 50% of your deposit value but it's a fraction of what you'd have to lock in Curve for max boost in BTC pools. To get max boost of 2.5x on 1 BTC deposit to hbtc pool, you need more than 20k $CRV = $42k. And it gives you boosted APR of 13% only.
11) Becauce boost in Curve works on multiple pools, it would make sense to split your 1 BTC and enter many pools instead of one. Or even better, use yield aggregator like Yearn to enjoy boosted APR without locking $CRV on your own. But yields are still not even close to 90%...
12) Can single $MTA stake be applied to boost APR on multiple fPools in mStable? Yes. But on up to 3 pools at once. It means you can increase efficiency of your $MTA lockup by depositing more funds into other fPools:
- BTC: mBTC/TBTC.
- USD: mUSD/BUSD and mUSD/GUSD.
13) Your 6277 vMTA could be used this way for max boost: 1. 2 x BTC + 1 x USD fPools: 1 BTC to mBTC/HBTC (88%), 1 BTC to mBTC/TBTC (52%), $58k USD to mUSD/GUSD (73%) 2. 1 x BTC + 2 x USD fPools: 1 BTC to mBTC/HBTC (88%), $58k USD to mUSD/GUSD (73%), $58k USD to mUSD/BUSD (70%).
14) With 3 pools fully boosted your initial investment of 19600 $MTA ($19k) becomes only 14% of total deposit in scenario 1. ($19k/$132k) and 12% in scenario 2. ($19k/$153k). Taking into account that boost increases base APR by 50pp, this may be a good bet.
15) Even if you don't want to have exposure to $MTA token, you are still able to boost your yields. This is DeFi in the end! You don't have to buy $MTA. You can borrow it from @CreamdotFinance on app.cream.finance!
16) Staking rewards (20% for max lockup period) can mitigate the borrowing cost (14% APR atm but this can change with the increasing borrowing demand). This way you get your max boost almost for free (transaction costs + opportunity costs due to used borrowing power on Cream).
17) It's important to mention that $MTA rewards are not unlocked immediately. You get 33% when you claim and the rest will be fully unlocked after 26 weeks. This is a bit longer term play. And all the APRs are volatile so it's possible they are different when you are reading it.
This is a great thread which uses the on-chain data from last weeks to prove that passive LP strategies on $UNI v3 will be substantially outperformed by active LP strategies (e.g. developed by @VisorFinance). Let me add a few comments to emphasize how big this difference can be.
TL;DR:
- Current comparisons of LP strategies in $UNI v3 overoptimistically present performance of passive ones.
- Passive LPing doesn't stand a chance vs active.
- Bullish on active LP strategy providers, i.e. $VISR
1) @fusion_hodl made a great comparison of passive vs active LP strategy for ETH-USDT since v3 launch. These 3 weeks have been very generous for LPs in this pool. Huge market volatility resulted in a lot of fees and relatively low impermanent loss (IL).
1) During this market crash, all the prices dumped heavily. It didn't matter if it was a meme coin like $DOGE or $SHIB or capital asset like $SUSHI or $BNT. I hoped fundamentally strong projects would be more resilient to such violent movements. But maybe they still will be?
2) I've been very conservative during this bull market. I didn't buy any meme token and decided to stick to DeFi projects which generated revenues. I was ok with $DOGE, $SHIB and $SAFEMOON substantially outperforming my portfolio. I just wanted to play a safe long term game.
3) I focused on DeFi tokens because they are not "coins" like the majority of vapor projects from the previous cycle. They are more like capital assets - projects generate revenues and, therefore, tokens can be subject to traditional valuation metrics.
Today was a good opportunity to see if high volatility on the market, with stable coins losing their pegs, can impact leveraged farming of $MATIC rewards on $AAVE. Let's see what happened with my position. 🧵👇
The idea of leveraged farming consists in iterative lending and borrowing of the same asset. Using the same asset is supposed to protect the position from liquidation even if debt to collateral ratio (D/C) is very high and close to liquidation ratio.
I assumed earlier that liquidation of such position would not be possible even in case of oracle failure. Today stable coins substantially deviated from their 1$ peg. How did it impact my risky leveraged $USDC farm at 80% D/C (liquidation ratio at 85%)?
1) I've been liquidity provider (LP) on Uniswap v2 long enough to understand that it was never an easy passive yield. If you didn't actively counteract impermanent loss (IL), it would most likely eat all your profits from fees. How does v3 impact life of LPs? Let's explore.
2) V2 didn't offer LPs any options to manage their liquidity pools. Each LP participated in the same market making strategy (x*y=k). To counteract impact of IL, LPs could merely average their entry prices to the pool and try to time their exit correctly.
3) V3 changes this dramatically. Each LP owns a unique market making (MM) strategy by defining a price range on which they wish to provide liquidity to. This way LPs can easily express their opinions on market movements and compete with other LPs.
I have no idea what $TRU is but its daily Volume / Liquidity ratio on Uniswap is at 37, which means 11% daily profit for LPs just from trading fees. Apparently $TRU can be bought cheaper on a bonding curve outside of Uni and is arbed heavily on Uni leading to such a crazy volume.
At current V/L ratio, LPs are in profit unless $TRU outperforms $ETH more than 170% in a single day which equates to impermanent loss of 11%. Price is dictated by the bonding curve and I don't know its shape but judging by current price action I bet it's a very low probability.
So if you hold $TRU and want to earn extra money, use the current opportunity of low gas prices and add liquidity to Uniswap. I'd do it but I'm a bit afraid to ape into $TRU after such price increase without knowing what it is and I'm too tired to look into it now.
One month ago I tweeted about the emergence of strong $OHM community. Since then circ. MC more than doubled (3x at the top) but price has been almost steadily increasing and haven't yet stress-tested the (3,3) meme. Will $OHM stakers prove their diamond hands now?
Although Coingecko reports a massive 57% decrease in price in last 24 hours which could suggest a sudden exodus, it's not a correct figure. There were some issues with incorrect price feed from Sushi which apparently haven't yet been fully fixed.
The correct 24h price decrease atm is 37%. Still substantial enough to draw attention. Of course, price is expected to go down because circulating supply gets bigger and bigger every day but sudden movements are always moments of truth. Let's check some on-chain metrics for $OHM.