Washington attempts to corral American voters into an illusion of choice between red and blue Washington supremacists—aka the Bushes and the Clintons.
When the American people can communicate freely across social media, everyone becomes a potential threat to the carefully constructed right and left political narratives.
Unrestrained social media empowered the American people to step off the establishment reservation and elect Donald Trump as President of the United States.
Love him or hate him, he was not a part of the script and that loss of control terrified the political class.
Everything since then—including the Russian collusion hoax, censorship on social media, and manipulation of our elections—has been the Washington establishment and their corporate press allies working overtime to reassert control over our system.
At this point, they aren't even committed to maintaining the illusion of choice.
They mean to change the whole system—hijacking federal election laws, packing the courts, stuffing the Senate, and abolishing the Electoral College—to assert permanent control.
But the illusion of choice has always been essential to their game.
As Noam Chomsky observed, the best way to control dissent is not to shut it down entirely, but to encourage very rigorous debate within a very narrow and defined window of allowable public opinion.
As JFK once warned, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable."
Rigging the game against American conservatives, the Washington establishment knows they are destroying hope for peaceful change through the political system.
What will this rigged system lead to?
The establishment knows, and that is why their new priorities are "gun control" and "domestic terrorism."
If Washington D.C. succeeds in banning "assault weapons," I guarantee you they will immediately begin working to gradually expand the definition of this vague terminology to include every modern firearm in America.
If Washington D.C. succeeds in branding some Americans "domestic terrorists" whose constitutional due process rights can be suspended, I guarantee you they will gradually expand the definition to include all kinds of political dissidents on the left and right.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Biological research aimed at increasing the virulence and lethality of pathogens and viruses, including enhancing their transmissibility among humans.
The argument for GOF research is that is conducted for biodefense purposes.
Dr. Anthony Fauci has argued that GOF research is worth any potential risks because it enables scientists to make preparations that could be useful in a pandemic.
Many other scientists have cautioned against GOF research, however, noting that science-enhanced pathogens can:
(1.) Escape from labs, infecting and killing people
(2.) Be used for biological warfare
I am sincerely concerned as I watch our constitutional rights fall like dominoes.
We lost the 4th Amendment after 9/11 with the passage of the Patriot Act and the growth of the surveillance state.
Since whistleblower @Snowden and journalist Julian Assange disclosed and reported the crimes of the Washington surveillance state, the federal government has pursued them to the ends of the earth to punish acts that one would think are protected by the 1st Amendment.
I am proud to serve as Senior Spokesperson for @YALiberty, an organization that exists to #MakeLibertyWin by holding politicians accountable to our Constitution.
Over the last several months, @YALiberty activists have been working hard to make Texas the 21st Constitutional Carry state in America by putting pressure on the Texas politicians.
Knocking nearly 12,000 doors and making over 79,000 phone calls, @YALiberty students connected constituents directly to their representatives and senators so they could tell them:
Sticker Shock: When @Walgreens in Texas wants to charge me $300 for a prescription that my direct primary care doctor in Maine could give me directly for $5.
When people see these exorbitant prices in healthcare, remember that government is the dam blocking choice and competition from flowing freely through the marketplace for the benefit of a privileged few corporate actors.
The reason I can’t get my prescription for $5 directly from the prescribing physician in Texas is a state law that prohibits me from doing so.