Racism is like crime. Every society is going to have some. The goal isn’t wiping it out (since that will never happen) but keeping it to a minimum. By every measure America has very little racism.
In order to believe that America has a racism problem, you have to believe in homeopathic racism: that tiny cases of racism can do vast amounts of harm. Which is absurd.
We are living in a weird kind of “racism Kabuki theater.”
An obvious example: the death of George Floyd had nothing to do with race.
And yet we were all supposed to act as if it did/does.
Such a state is possible only when the racism demand far outstrips the racism supply.
In such a situation, faux racism will be “found” or produced.
Examples: the wave of fake, staged “hate crimes”; the silly debate over “Jim Crow Road” in California.
Jim Crow Road is named after a Californian named Jim Crow. The name has nothing to do with the “Jim Crow” of segregation. And yet people are up in arms AS IF it did have something to do with racism.
Recall the professor of Chinese who was punished for saying “ne ga”—becomes it SOUNDED LIKE the n-word to some pathetically weak undergraduates.
In 9th grade, my Social Studies teacher was named Jim Crow. I’m sure today he’d be fired for his “racism.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“At least for the Husserl of the Ideas, Formal and Transcendental Logic, and Cartesian Meditations, phenomenology is the science of pure essences, and of the transcendental subjectivity in which these essences are constituted.”
“Husserl’s phenomenology is rooted in Plato, Kant, and modern mathematics. His essences are mathematical in the sense of possessing no teleological order, no hierarchical structure which is the presence of divine totality in and through the phenomena.”
“Each essence is self-identical, or obedient to the laws of finite (nondialectical) logic. If I may so put it, each essence is an absolute expression of the Absolute, and not a dialectical element in the gradually to be completed self-exhibition of a totally visible Absolute.”
“Hark ye yet again,—the little lower layer. All visible objects, man, are but as pasteboard masks. But in each event—in the living act, the undoubted deed—there, some unknown but still reasoning thing puts forth the mouldings of its features from behind the unreasoning mask.”
“If man will strike, strike through the mask! How can the prisoner reach outside except by thrusting through the wall? To me, the white whale is that wall, shoved near to me. Sometimes I think there’s naught beyond. But ’tis enough.”
“He tasks me; he heaps me; I see in him outrageous strength, with an inscrutable malice sinewing it. That inscrutable thing is chiefly what I hate; and be the white whale agent, or be the white whale principal, I will wreak that hate upon him.”
∙ Not all, because she only lowered the age to a milk entitlement
∙ not some, because any child who was legitimately malnourished could still get free milk from the government
So, the actual quantification is "none."
So, the charge is FALSE.
What Thatcher did was lower the age from 11 to 7 whereby UK children were given free, rather nasty and of dubious benefit, milk to children each day. The age was lowered 3 years prior, and later lowered to age 5.
If this was PURE EVIL (as claimed), why has it not been reversed?
Therefore, pro-woman legislation will be regarded as anti-trans.
“Hate” doesn’t enter into it.
Or if you want to play that card, you are espousing misogyny. 🤷🏻♀️
There is, of course, nothing anti-woman about the medical cum psychological phenomenon of transgenderism.
But trans ideology, which demands as *justice* that male-bodied persons be able to compete unfairly against female-bodied ones in the name of “fairness” *is* anti-woman.