Another @BritishArmy AFV thought. I'm told that the process of buying a replacement for AS90 has kicked off. Now, the "favourite" at this stage seems to be the Hanwha K-9 - tracked.
But here's one thought: if Ajax does get canned, then the overwhelming number of AFVs that the Army will have will be wheeled. So, what are the issues of coherence of trying to mix-and-match wheels and tracks.
OK, it'll have to be rationalised for CR3/Boxer, c'est la vie. But what are the implications for Boxer Brigade Combat Teams if the main AFVs can move at 50mph down the motorways, but their artillery has to follow at 15mph on low loaders?
Apart from the fact that if Ajax is anything to go by, there will not be any order for years for Future Fires, would it not actually make sense to wait to see what happens with the fate of Ajax?
Seriously, Hanwha would almost certainly prefer to be told, upfront, that the Army wants a wheeled 155mm (Donau, Caesar, Archer etc), rather than to be strung along for months/years, only for the wheels/tracks issue to be the decider.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Francis Tusa

Francis Tusa Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FTusa284

4 Jun
Vibration, and what it is doing to the programme.

"The Terms of Reference asked us to consider two questions, readiness of IOC and likely readiness for deployment of the Household Cavalry Regiment (HCR) in 2023."
"In terms of IOC, the Capability Drop 1 vehicles are in the hands of the Army in trials and with HCR. There remains significant concern both in relation to noise and vibration in the vehicles and the variation in levels of vibration across the fleet."
Read 21 tweets
3 Jun
I'll go back to something that only really just "jumped out" of the IPA Ajax report:

"Given there is no alternative supplier or platform option..."

@cabinetofficeuk IPA report: did they come up with this assessment on their own? Or was it what they were told by the Army? Well..
Read these to the "Vision On Gallery Tune" (Showing my sadly inevitable age)...
Read 12 tweets
3 Jun
Thanks to individual who posed me the question as to Ajax's risk rating as per the annual Infrastructure and Project Authority's report on MoD programmes. Well, in last year's report, it was rated "AMBER"...
But in the 2021 Ajax report, "The Delivery Confidence Assessment is rated RED.." In other words, the programme's status has deteriorated - it's got worse, not better.
AMBER definition is: "Successful delivery appears feasible but significant issues already exist, requiring management attention. These appear resolvable at this stage and, if addressed promptly, should not present a cost/schedule overrun."
Read 6 tweets
2 Jun
@jeromestarkey @larisamlbrown @SheridanDani @bealejonathan @helenwarrell @thinkdefence
@UKDefJournal @JonHawkes275 @TotherChris @harry_lye @nicholadrummond
More to come re the Infrastructure and Projects Authority report on Ajax tomorrow, but a few thoughts from first data drop..
Basically, the IPA report shows utter incontinence as regards programme management across the piece. There isn't a, "oh, it failed here" - no: it has been systematic programme failure across the board. I will quote tomorrow from the IPA report to back this up...
One key conclusion is about "hand offs" - they are badly managed. Now, in ANY programme there are times when one manger hands something over to another - that's what happens. But the IPA Ajax report seems to suggest that for a number/a lot of "hands offs", that Ajax managers...
Read 16 tweets
2 Jun
"Successful delivery of the programme to time, cost and quality appears to be unachievable. There are major issues which, at this stage, do not appear to be manageable or resolvable within the current Business Case approval. The programme needs to be re-baselined."
Note that currently, Ajax "fails" on time, cost AND quality. And that the current programme will not deliver. So, the current £5.5bn budget is going to be busted. And as for dates?
Read 18 tweets
1 Jun
Well, the story is finally out there: Ajax noise/vibrations is causing injuries to British Army operators. I understand that there was no pushback to the story from @DefenceHQ @DefenceHQPress, rather, it was, "yeah: it's got problems".
thesun.co.uk/news/15123499/…
This metaphorical shrugging of shoulders is interesting, as in the Independent Gateway 4 Review, "It is clear from the Integrated Review, the recently published “Defence in a competitive Age and interviews with senior officers that AJAX is fundamental to the British Army’s..."
"...capability from the mid-2020s. The review team has seen no alternative plan to AJAX..." In several references, it would seem that the @ArmyCGS @BritishArmy are very committed - over-committed? - to the Ajax programme.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(