Just in case anyone still believes the BS you’ve been fed for the past 15 mos. - note these are only emails. What do you think was discussed by phone? Fauci->Gates->Zuckerberg. “Conspiracy theory” no longer.
We’ve been saying it all along. Who are the good guys:
A-The folks profiting and censoring, lying manipulating and colluding
B-The folks bucking the narrative at great personal and career risk and fighting for liberty, free debate, and free science
Who do you support?
This one is especially maddening. In April Fauci admits many of the tests are garbage. How much turmoil has been predicated on bogus test results? Cases, hospitalizations, deaths. We’ve been saying this >year.
Gotta wonder what “anomalies” in Feb20 Wuhan would make them “look like loons”? As if they haven’t looked like loons ever since. Farrar: SAGE and WHO. Holmes: Chinese CDC. Fauci copied.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"I’m motivated by fear of what is going to happen to our world, to the fabric of our society. I’m worried about the future of my children. I want them to live in a free and liberal democracy - not in the totalitarian techno-medico-bureaucracy we’re heading into."
Those are the words of Nick Hudson, PANDA cofounder, from the Q&A portion of his BizNews talk that millions have watched yet was censored by YT (linked at end of thread).
Now that much of the Covid panic is fizzling out, we need to turn our attention to this underlying theme...
What is driving the censorship, the bad data, the psychological manipulation, the groupthink, the "wrongthink", the careless stripping of liberties and scientific mores?
Nick continues: "History is riddled with stories of how concessions to freedom and liberty rapidly evolve.."
Has censorship EVER in all of history been practiced by the good guys?
Has censorship EVER NOT been about hiding the inconvenient truth?
Has control and coordination of the media EVER been a good thing for society?
Has stifling of open debate EVER resulted in progress?
But now we are supposed to believe that THIS time these things are all good for us and not the least bit suspicious?
Well, we have a saying in finance. The most dangerous words of all are "this time it's different."
You see, there's a large group of folks who would have you believe that half the world is subject to persuasion by dangerous "misinformation" and therefore, that which the keepers of the words deem misinformation must be squelched.
Crystal clear elucidation of the replacement of
science 🔬
by "The Science" scientism 🙏✝️
Philosopher Matthew Crawford interviewed by @freddiesayers for @unherd . Matthew pretty much nails the entire faux expert and faux science phenomena.
Quotes of ✨brilliance✨ follow:
"Science has changed from a mode of inquiry to a form of authority that you are not allowed to question"
"We've seen this extraordinary extension of expert jurisdiction over every domain of life...it involves a delegitimizing of common sense as a guide to action."
"You can't really follow the science because science doesn't lead anywhere... it can't make the choices for us, and pretending otherwise is a way for decision makers to avoid responsibility for the choices they make on our behalf."
Dr Sunetra Gupta: "imperfect lockdowns [which all are] are closer to a 'let it rip' strategy than focused protection."
Dr Scott Atlas: "Our country more than any other was willing to sacrifice our children out of fear."
Dr Martin Kulldorff: "Children should not be wearing masks"
Dr Jay Bhattacharya: "Former CDC director said masks were more effective than vaccines - simply not true. You would expect to see a profound effect if they worked."
Dr Gupta: "Variant presence indicates there are only a few ways the virus can change. Variants indicate SLIGHT advantage over existing strain. More likely to happen when more people immune. Overhyped. Models predicting huge variant effect are in denial of herd immunity."
Or, how does a biased world rid itself of the best example of a non-lockdown control for its horrible lockdown experiment?
Simple! CHANGE THE DATA.
Of course we all know Sweden has been a battleground regarding its mild voluntary lockdown strategy versus the heavy lockdowns of most of the EU. Inconvenient graphs like this one are quite a thorn in Team Lockdown’s side. Sweden fewer deaths/M, much better quality of life.
When I did some analysis in the Spring and Fall, I looked at Oxford’s stringency index as a proxy for lockdown severity. And sure enough Sweden was significantly lower stringency than all other EU countries.