Countering ransomware problem requires imposition of costs "FBI Director Christopher Wray, in a WSJ interview, calls the fight against cyberattacks a shared responsibility that includes government agencies, the private sector and average Americans" wsj.com/articles/fbi-d…
for almost a decade, the U.S. response in cyberspace has been hand wringing, half steps, sanctions, charges against hackers unlikely to be arrested. Not gonna work, we know this because problem has only gotten worse
Guessing admin will head into Biden-Putin summit, will issue a "stern warning" but stern warnings have been repeatedly issued & Russia doesn't stop, because they know nothing will happen, U.S. won't follow through
This time, what if U.S. thought like Putin and took retaliatory action before the summit? U.S. enters negotiations on its heels, Russia leans in before negotiations, so when they concede they are still advancing from status quo.
In DC circles, these discussions have been years of ominous talk of cyber "Pearl Harbor" doomsday movie fantasies. Right now, our oil pipeline has been shuttered, our food supply shocked, our democracy subverted & where is the source? Russia. Its a cancer, not Pearl Harbor
The cancer of Putin's Russia in cyberspace is at least Stage 3, are we going to wait till the turn off the lights? hack NASDAQ? Do we have to have a Pearl Harbor before we act? Maybe this time U.S. should act before June 16, come in strong
Cyber strategists always offer "we're more vulnerable" but what's more vulnerable than repeated different infrastructure failures due to cyber attacks every week?
Cyber strategists argue about Russian/other country sovereignty with regards to cyber, throw up their hands? But we've seen what happens when countries harbor terrorists, we now see what happens when other countries harbor cyber criminals. Is the answer sanctions? charges? NO
U.S. stance on cyber is operating from a position of never taking any future losses. Inoperable & prevents deterrence, instead leading to more losses. Balance must be restored, will require more than negotiations, "stern warnings" & sanctions.
current system leaves private sector to feel as if they are on their own, which leads to them paying ransom, incentivizing more ransomware attacks, or private sector undertaking their own retaliation overtime - not good.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Regarding Giuliani, see sanctions Sep 2020, from “late 2019 through mid-2020, Derkach waged a covert influence campaign centered on cultivating false and unsubstantiated narratives concerning U.S. officials in the upcoming 2020 Presidential Election” home.treasury.gov/news/press-rel…
“Derkach’s unsubstantiated narratives were pushed in Western media through coverage of press conferences and other news events, including interviews and statements.”
“Between May and July 2020, Derkach released edited audio tapes and other unsupported information with the intent to discredit U.S. officials, and he levied unsubstantiated allegations against U.S. and international political figures.”
Good discussion here from @JonKBateman & @craignewmark similar endpoint as counterterrorism circa 2009 "The debate about countering disinformation can itself be a fact-free zone: long on theories, short on evidence." slate.com/technology/202… via @Slate
agree with the overhype of disinformation when most of what occurs is propaganda, and disinformation without a base of propaganda is less effective, but I'm not convinced there's a data problem (volume), a data sucking center will not be fruitful
There needs to be fusion between Silicon Valley & USG/EU, but it should not be for reactive study, should be for proactive action. Fusion center concept already proposed, met with yawn & shrug securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/advanced-persi…
well here we go "Justice Dept. Links Oath Keepers and Proud Boys Ahead of Capitol Riot" - "member of the Oath Keepers militia said he was communicating with the far-right Proud Boys, prosecutors said, making their first link between the groups." nytimes.com/2021/03/24/us/…
"He called us all to Capitol" not DC....not pretty
Idea Trump wants to start own social media platform tells you he understands how to make the media pay attention to him on Twitter, but nothing about how social media works. Social media runs on ads, only so many Goya & MyPillows around, if its all trolls, will get boring quick
Trump would need Fox News to cover his social media platform relentlessly to monetize an increasingly smaller base, but then comes the moderation problem, would not be long till things get out of control, then guess what happens? Jan 6 Part Deux
may be proved wrong, but idea of Trump social media platform sounds as viable as Trump Steaks, Trump University, Trump Casino Atlantic City... how long can one discuss "Her emails" or "Voter Fraud"?
ok, new day, new thread, intelligence community is back, Day 2...Domestic Violent Extremism Threat in 2021. dhs.gov/sites/default/…
1- As Director Wray noted couple weeks ago, despite Jan 6, most likely to carry out attacks...stochastic haters, bottom left corner from this post clintwatts.substack.com/p/virtual-insa…
2 - Here they note militia groups as most dangerous, while less frequent, potential for mass casualties is higher because magic terrorism combo - Access to targets, Access to weapons, training/experience in operations, motivated to strike. clintwatts.substack.com/p/virtual-insa…