There's a virtual industry of operatives funded by the Atlantic Council -- which in turn is funded by Gulf State despots and US intel agencies & NATO governments -- whose purpose is to demand the internet be purged of anyone dissenting from their orthodoxies.
Pro-censorship operatives from the Atlantic Council have built fan bases among US liberals because that movement is devoted to censoring anyone and everyone whose questions their pieties and narratives.
For all of you liberal groupies of Atlantic Council censorship operatives like @jaredlholt, here's what your cheering for: their own description of who funds them.
Given that the favorite cable stars of liberals are ex CIA Directors, FBI agents, NSA lawyers and Pentagon brass, along with neocons and Bush/Cheney operatives, it shouldn't be surprising that their online idols work to impose censorship on behalf of the Atlantic Council. Adds up
The most passionate, tireless and devoted advocates of online political censorship by the union of state and corporate monopolistic power are found at liberal corporate media outlets.
Agitating and cheering for state/corporate censorship is a virtual religious mission there.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's like what happened with Mueller: once liberals start revering a government official (which they often do), any criticisms of that state idol are inherently illegitimate and ill-intentioned.
(Of course, once they disappoint liberals -- as Mueller did -- it's open season).
This article - by an anti-Trump liberal journalist - is a great work of investigative reporting. It doesn't mean every claim is proven or that one has to believe each assertion -- I don't -- but it is one of the best attempts yet to grapple with what the USG did on COVID origins.
Even given my low expectations for the liberal sector of the corporate media, I find it shocking how little coverage they're devoting to Fauci's fascinating email archive.
He's one of the most important officials on the planet over the last 18 months, and yet: virtual silence.
There are divisions on the left over how to treat the lab-leak theory. For those hostile to it, is the argument that:
1) The lab-leak theory is clearly false & COVID is obviously zoonotic; or,
2) The dangers of finding out (fueling a Cold War with China) outweigh the benefits?
Mainstream institutions had seriously doubted the FBI had solved the 2001 anthrax case. That has all now been memory-holed: elite circles implicitly agreed to just move on.
Either way, revelations that emerged then about US Government bio-research labs have newfound relevance.
To understand the current debate over COVID origins, it is really worth returning to what happened with the still-bizarre 2001 anthrax attacks and the FBI's claim that the highly weaponized strain came from a US Army research lab. Lots of key lessons:
This is exactly how they see themselves. As a "journalist," you pick one side of the partisan/ideological war and you enslave yourself to it. That's why they see any criticisms of their side as necessarily support for the other. Their brains function only in binary terms.
Smart people not in journalism have no trouble seeing how trapped these partisan drones are in primitive and vapid labels. That opposing militaristic, imperialistic, censorship-mad & corporatist liberals puts you on the "hard right" is obscenely stupid:
The Department of Homeland Security just issued its fourth danger bulletin this year.
Despite the fact that *none* has yet happened, both the weapons and rhetorical tactics of the first War on Terror are increasingly visible.
Virtually every authoritarian power that made the first War on Terror so menacing to core civil liberties -- domestic surveillance, domestic no-fly lists for citizens, CIA interference in domestic politics -- are being weaponized in the name of this new domestic War on Terror.
European leaders -- including Germany's Merkel and France's Macron -- are furious over new reports this week that the Obama/Biden Admin used Danish intelligence in 2014 to spy on their own EU allies, including Merkel herself. Demanding answers from Biden:
Recall that at the height of the Snowden reporting, Merkel was so furious with Obama that she accused him of using "Stasi" tactics to spy on her and entire European populations -- a rather stinging accusation given her childhood in East Germany:
In my 2014 book based on NSA reporting, I described a program whereby NSA cooperated with Danish intelligence to spy on US allies. Snowden himself warned of how Denmark could be used by the US to spy on German leaders and German citizens: