💧simon holmes à court Profile picture
Jun 5, 2021 20 tweets 11 min read Read on X
🧵nuclear zealots like @Dr_Keefer often claim that wind turbines and solar panels last only 20 years.

…and that nuclear plants are somehow "immortal".

one problem: that's 🐂💩! Image
it’s not unusual for solar panels to come with a 25 year warranty these days.

the manufacturer of my solar panels claims they have a *40* year useful life, and guarantee that at 25 years they’ll still be 92% as productive as they were when brand new.

sunpower.maxeon.com/au/sites/defau… Image
#ontario solar manufacturer @SilfabSolar claims the world's longest performance warranty — at least 82.6% of their original power at the end of their 30th year.

silfabsolar.com/wp-content/upl… ImageImage
in 1976 a 3.5kW array was installed at the university of oldenburg in germany — one of the first in the world.

panels from the array were extensively tested 35 years later, and had degraded by just 4%.

presse.uni-oldenburg.de/einblicke/54/f… Image
the 407kW singleton solar farm is #australia's oldest, built to partially power the #Sydney2000 olympics, now owned by @AndrewThaler.

the first "unit" of the solar farm was commissioned in 1998, making it 23 years old this year — still going strong.

singletonsolar.com.au Image
australia's oldest wind turbine was erected at breamlea in 1987… ie. it’s now 34 years old!

i haven’t checked recently, but did confirm that it was operating fine in its 30th year, helped along over the years with a lot of love from @reneworgau members.

reneweconomy.com.au/blow-out-the-c… Image
the oldest operating wind farm in australia is at #crookwell, a stone’s throw from energy numpty @angustaylor.

built in 1998, the wind farm comprises eight 600kW turbines — ie. each turbine is 10x the power of the breamlea turbine. Image
these are relics from the early days of wind energy…

current technology is 3.6MW+, at least 5x bigger than the #crookwell turbines — and much more efficient.

…and offshore designs are now reaching 12MW with 15MW on the way — almost 5x bigger again.

vestas.com/en/products/of… Image
in an average year, each of these next generation offshore wind turbines will generate ~1000x the energy of the little old breamlea turbine. Image
unsurprisingly, many of the wind turbines installed 25 years ago struggle to compete economically with the new generation.

like an old car, you could keep them running indefinitely, but it often makes more sense to replace (“repower”) them with the latest, greatest model.
how long will current generation wind turbines last?

one data point is that @Vestas, the largest wind turbine manufacturer globally, sells their turbines with a *30* year service package.

globenewswire.com/news-release/2… Image
…but really, wind farms are like grandfather’s axe — parts can be proactively replaced as they age, piece by piece.

repaired or replaced — just like any other productive, valuable tool or machine. Image
so how long do wind turbines & solar panels last?

solar panels installed today will be operating in 30, 40, even 50 years from now.

similarly, many wind farms will operate for as long, made up of turbines maintained to last 30+ years, or repowered as dictated by economics. Image
yes, you will hear of a few wind farms that are repowered early or were built in bad locations and torn down. these are the exception.

just like there are some nukes that haven't lasted the distance. Image
75 nuclear reactors began operations in the 60s — only 5 are still operating.

the remainder shut down at an average age of just 22.9 years. Image
here i'm visiting gentilly nuclear generation station, in quebec, canada.

unit-1 ran from 1971 to 1977 with just 180 on-power days due to design issues.

thankfully they got a full 30 years out of unit-2, shuttered in 2012.

it will take ~50 years to decommission the plants. Image
of the ~545 nukes started up since 1970, more than 109 have already shut down, at an average age of 29.6 years

the ~440 operating* nukes worldwide average 31.4 years old.

*official stats still count many zombie reactors that haven't run since 2011 as "operating" Image
i've no doubt that a good number of today's nukes will be operating at 60 maybe 80 years of age.

some will shut early due to failures… some due to politics… but beyond that, the number that "live" that long depends on whether it’ll be economic to keep maintaining them. Image
"grandfather's axe" applies in nuclear too…

last year #ontario power generation completed a refurbishment of darlington unit 2.

24,000,000 work hours and $billions were invested to give a 26 year old reactor another 30 years of life.

"rebuildables"

nuclearstreet.com/nuclear_power_… Image
so, if you hear nuke bros claim that "wind and solar only last 20 years" and "nuclear power plants last 60, 80, 100 years"…

it's just 🐂💩.

…and now they know it.

by all means, feel free to advocate for your favourite technologies, but stick to the truth!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 💧simon holmes à court

💧simon holmes à court Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @simonahac

Jul 20
hardly a week goes by without some 🪿telling me that "saudi arabia built a nuclear power station in just 8 years" or similar.

south korea built it for the UAE & it'll be 16+ years from formal announcement to project completion.

no, it was not on time & likely not on budget Image
any 🪿telling you nuclear can be built in australia in 2-3, 5, 10 or 15 years:
• ignores years of work required before construction starts
• doesn't understand IAEA's "construction" ignores _years_ of actual construction
• assumes an established regulator & warm supply chain.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 28
🤓 icymi, latest data from @EnergyInstitute is out!

this dataset has been lovingly curated since 1952, until recently by @bp_plc.

a good report, lots of charts and most exciting for energy nerds, lots of raw data!

i knocked up a few charts 🧵

energyinst.org/statistical-re…
🤓 global electricity generation by technology

gas and coal still growing, but at a slower pace than renewables.

quite likely we'll see coal and gas both peak in the next few years. Image
🤓 global nuclear and wind+solar, as energy

nuclear peaked in 2006. IEA expects that a new peak may be set in 2025. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 18
☢️ with the #coalition expected to announce its #nuclear plan on wednesday, here are 18 questions every diligent journalist should be seeking answers to:

🧵
1. how will dutton remove the ban?

the coalition would require control of the senate to repeal the ban, which is embedded in two acts.

the coalition hasn’t controlled the senate since 2004-2007.
2. which state(s) would dutton build the reactors in?

only VIC, NSW and QLD grids are big enough to handle a large nuclear reactor.

WA, SA and TAS grids are too small to host a GW-scale reactor.
Read 20 tweets
May 20
🤓 you'll probably hear scary claims today about "blackouts" in NSW, due to a "reliability gap".

…caused by delays with SA-NSW transmission line, a few batteries & mothballed generators.

to meet the 99.998% reliability standard, NSW needs to build more kit.

not a big deal. 🧵 Image
the eraring power station has 4 units, each 720MW. delaying closure of 1-2 units could fill the gap.

a 500MW–1GW gas generator operating <10 hours a year would also suffice. lower emissions and might be cheaper?

helpfully AEMO has provided 9 options to fill the gap: Image
small reliability gaps are forecast in VIC and SA, but far enough out that they'll likely evaporate… as they often do for this regular report.

why? because the reports show what happens if we don't do anything more than committed — and we pretty much always do.
Read 6 tweets
May 15
i attended the ‘navigating nuclear’ conference on monday in sydney.

up front: there were some high quality presentations — on issues such as health impacts, safety culture, regulatory systems. Image
…but sadly there was also some abject nonsense…
the presentation below argued that we have two options:

1. build a complex grid of wind, solar, hydro, hydrogen, batteries, pumped hydro, transmission and EVs.

2. just build nuclear and use existing powerlines.

…apparently #2 is the way to go. 🙄 Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 21
⚛️ @abcnews's recent #FactCheck made a classic rookie error in calculating that the latest US nukes had "build times of 10.1 and 10.4 years".

depending how you count it, it took somewhere between 13.9 years and ~19 years to build them.

easy mistake to make.

let me explain… 🧵
ABC's analysis assumes the build time is the elapsed period between "construction start" and "grid connection" dates.

in the real world, a nuclear power building project begins years before "construction start" and often finishes months after "grid connection".
"construction start" is defined by the IAEA as the "the date when first major placing of concrete for the base mat of the reactor building is made."

"grid connection" is when "the plant is first connected to the electrical grid for the supply of power."

pris.iaea.org/PRIS/Glossary.…
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(