🧵nuclear zealots like @Dr_Keefer often claim that wind turbines and solar panels last only 20 years.
…and that nuclear plants are somehow "immortal".
one problem: that's 🐂💩!
it’s not unusual for solar panels to come with a 25 year warranty these days.
the manufacturer of my solar panels claims they have a *40* year useful life, and guarantee that at 25 years they’ll still be 92% as productive as they were when brand new.
#ontario solar manufacturer @SilfabSolar claims the world's longest performance warranty — at least 82.6% of their original power at the end of their 30th year.
australia's oldest wind turbine was erected at breamlea in 1987… ie. it’s now 34 years old!
i haven’t checked recently, but did confirm that it was operating fine in its 30th year, helped along over the years with a lot of love from @reneworgau members.
…but really, wind farms are like grandfather’s axe — parts can be proactively replaced as they age, piece by piece.
repaired or replaced — just like any other productive, valuable tool or machine.
so how long do wind turbines & solar panels last?
solar panels installed today will be operating in 30, 40, even 50 years from now.
similarly, many wind farms will operate for as long, made up of turbines maintained to last 30+ years, or repowered as dictated by economics.
yes, you will hear of a few wind farms that are repowered early or were built in bad locations and torn down. these are the exception.
just like there are some nukes that haven't lasted the distance.
75 nuclear reactors began operations in the 60s — only 5 are still operating.
the remainder shut down at an average age of just 22.9 years.
here i'm visiting gentilly nuclear generation station, in quebec, canada.
unit-1 ran from 1971 to 1977 with just 180 on-power days due to design issues.
thankfully they got a full 30 years out of unit-2, shuttered in 2012.
it will take ~50 years to decommission the plants.
of the ~545 nukes started up since 1970, more than 109 have already shut down, at an average age of 29.6 years
the ~440 operating* nukes worldwide average 31.4 years old.
*official stats still count many zombie reactors that haven't run since 2011 as "operating"
i've no doubt that a good number of today's nukes will be operating at 60 maybe 80 years of age.
some will shut early due to failures… some due to politics… but beyond that, the number that "live" that long depends on whether it’ll be economic to keep maintaining them.
"grandfather's axe" applies in nuclear too…
last year #ontario power generation completed a refurbishment of darlington unit 2.
24,000,000 work hours and $billions were invested to give a 26 year old reactor another 30 years of life.
hardly a week goes by without some 🪿telling me that "saudi arabia built a nuclear power station in just 8 years" or similar.
south korea built it for the UAE & it'll be 16+ years from formal announcement to project completion.
no, it was not on time & likely not on budget
any 🪿telling you nuclear can be built in australia in 2-3, 5, 10 or 15 years:
• ignores years of work required before construction starts
• doesn't understand IAEA's "construction" ignores _years_ of actual construction
• assumes an established regulator & warm supply chain.
☢️ with the #coalition expected to announce its #nuclear plan on wednesday, here are 18 questions every diligent journalist should be seeking answers to:
🧵
1. how will dutton remove the ban?
the coalition would require control of the senate to repeal the ban, which is embedded in two acts.
the coalition hasn’t controlled the senate since 2004-2007.
2. which state(s) would dutton build the reactors in?
only VIC, NSW and QLD grids are big enough to handle a large nuclear reactor.
WA, SA and TAS grids are too small to host a GW-scale reactor.