Tweet

#AMC NOT A DEAD CAT

5 Jun, 8 tweets, 4 min read

(1) I’m going to do my best to expand on this in this thread. I’ll preface this by saying. I am not a financial advisor. I am a cat. If anyone else follows this information and sees something different please DM me and speak up. We are a family of unorganized apes.

(2) This is the data I tossed together from an ETF called SFYF which hold AMC shares. Many ETFs hold AMC this one specifically shows a massive amount of Failure to delivers. At various different points.

@CringleKitten

(3) @CringleKitten and myself dmd about this and here’s my questioning / train of thought.

(4) continued

(5) Now believed that this is separate from the info there is Naked Shorts. But in my cat like opinion:
I think this could be a lead showing there could be more shares sold to the public than the available float.

(6) If anyone would like too look into this more. This video got me down this rabbit hole as ETFs have different failure to deliver rules.

Video:

(7) this is just Info. Not Financial Advice from anyone. Please. Share your DD on this or others. #ApesTogetherStrong #AMC

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @ThatSadCat3

#AMC NOT A DEAD CAT

@ThatSadCat3

5 Jun

So if I understand this right. They are taking shares from the ETF. Selling them into the market creating selling pressure. And then failing to deliver the underlying shares #AMC to the ETF and on top of that shorting the ETF creating Naked Shorts in the AMC’s market? Thoughts?

Video reference that I’ve been using to understand how they can unpack and sell shares in an ETF in a process called operational shorting.

So if I follow this. They can unpack an ETF. Sell the underlying stock into that underlying market. #AMC in this case. This creates selling pressure. Or they could use those shares underlying to short AMC and create selling pressure. Then they fail to deliver the stock in the ETF

Read 4 tweets

#AMC NOT A DEAD CAT

@ThatSadCat3

5 Jun

So I think I’ve got a breadcrumb that could be expanded on by you Intelligent apes.
🦍
I would like y’all to look at this data I compiled from Fintel involving the SFYF a ETF fund that has a 23.53% weighted impact on AMC the underlying stock. #AMC

I’m also seeing that there are very different failure to reliever rules for ETF funds
Source:

So at the 12minute point he talks about how essentially you can buy and open an ETF. Take out the stock and sell it being AMC in this case. This is Driving down the price of the stock.
...

Read 6 tweets

#AMC NOT A DEAD CAT

@ThatSadCat3

4 Jun

@BAMinvestor

The fact hedgefunds manipulated the stock to throw off predictions by @BAMinvestor shows they are watching all of our posts closely.
💎🙌🏻🦍
This also mean that:
Data such as from @ORTEX is now more unreliable as they are likely getting information that is skewed or falsified.

@ORTEX

That doesn’t mean @ORTEX is purposefully reporting incorrect information more that the information that is reported to them has become skewed or falsified.

Think about it. You’re a hedge fund you made a bad bet and now for you to correctly pay it you will likely have to close your doors is a business. But if you lie cheat and manipulate and are faced with millions in fines it’s still cheaper than bankruptcy.

Read 4 tweets

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Share this page!

#AMC NOT A DEAD CAT

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @ThatSadCat3

#AMC NOT A DEAD CAT

#AMC NOT A DEAD CAT

#AMC NOT A DEAD CAT

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Like this author's thread?