This #CyclingScienceSunday we're going to do something a bit different. I was on Wortley Road (a typical small shopping/dining street) for #PedalPoll, and I informally collected some data on parking and active transportation. The results are SHOCKING (they're actually not).
But first, the cycling numbers. There were 78 cyclists, with a pretty good gender split (42% women, 58% men). 17% were seniors, which is interesting because I've been told that we can't get rid of parking because too many seniors come to Wortley (more on that in a minute).
Almost all the cyclists were white, which is clearly something London needs to work on.
According to London, Wortley gets 8,000 vehicles per day. Assuming most come during the daylight hours, that's ~400 cars/hour. The block between Askin and Bruce has about 20 parking spaces on it. I was curious about how many of those 400 cars/hour would actually stop.
Between 12:00-2:00 on Saturday, only 40 cars actually parked on Wortley Road between Askin and Bruce. Approximately 800 cars drove down the street during that time, which means only ~5% of cars are actually stopping. The parking spaces were never more than half full.
This is important, because on-street parking is extremely dangerous to cyclists, and Wortley has parking on both sides of the street. The infrastructure is actively hostile to cyclists, but we're still there.
(On a related note, I stayed for a bit after my official count and collected another batch of data I've always been curious about: did you know that 70% of vehicles don't come to a complete stop at the Wortley and Askin intersection?)
It also ruins the ambiance for the many cafes and restaurants on the street. Drivers are just using Wortley as a thoroughfare, the vast majority (95%) aren't actually stopping. This explains why replacing parking with bike lanes is good for business.
I also counted the pedestrians. There were 220 people walking down Wortley during the two hours I was there. I wasn't able to count how many stopped at businesses, but it was evident that way more than 40 people stopped at Sidetrack and Black Walnut alone.
I wasn't able to collect demographic data, but many of these pedestrians were seniors. So while it's true that lots of seniors come to Wortley, they seem to be coming by active transportation more than by car.
So we have this lovely retail district, which is the perfect spot for a bike lane, but is currently being used as a highway by drivers who don't actually stop and spend time or money there.
Despite that, two full lanes are wasted on mostly empty parking spaces, one of which could be used for bike lanes without making a difference to the actual demand for parking, and which would increase the numbers of cyclists and pedestrians.
Or we could just block the whole area off to cars. They're just using it as a highway anyway, so why shouldn't they go down Ridout, which is actually intended for that? There is loads of parking on side streets and parking lots for the few people that actually do come by car.
There are of course limits to my informal data collection. Some pedestrians could have actually parked out of sight, and people probably park more at different times, and I wasn't able to determine the exact percentage of active transportation users who visited businesses.
But what I saw was a huge amount of parking space sitting empty waiting for cars that never came, which could have been used by the hundreds of cyclists and pedestrians who were actually there, spending time in their community and supporting small businesses.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The authors interviewed 24 people living in Brisbane, Australia, which is a large, low-density city with relatively little cycling infrastructure. Most participants drove before going car free, and all were legally able to drive.
Three key attitudes of car-free people emerged from the interviews: they were concerned with the environment, they wanted to be healthier and/or they wanted to live a minimalist lifestyle.
The authors used an eye-tracking headset with 19 participants who drove a set route in a retail/residential area of Toronto. The route included two turns off a major road with a bike lane (Bloor St.) onto other roads.
Turn 1 had a painted bike lane, while Turn 2 had a lane separated by parked cars that had a median with a bollard at the intersection. The parking ended 10m before the intersection.
This study comes from Grenoble, France, which is a cycling-friendly city. The authors did 19 interviews with policymakers, residents with different identities, and bike service providers to identify barriers to cycling for people from marginalized communities.
From these interviews, the authors identified four main barriers to cycling: racism, financial barriers, information or knowledge barriers, and spatial inequalities.
The authors (@RachelAldred, @Urban_Turbo and Anna Goodman who I can't find on twitter), looked at car registration data from 2015-2019 to determine whether LTNs and other cycling infrastructure built in London, England impacted car ownership compared to other areas in the city.
Two years after a low-traffic neighbourhood was built, car ownership in that area had decreased by 6% (23 cars/vans per 1000) relative to other areas of the city. Likewise, where cycle tracks were built, car ownership decreased by 2% (7 cars/vans per 1000).
In light of all the bad news for pedestrians and cyclists this week, this #CyclingScienceSunday let's look at how news coverage of crashes affects perceptions of pedestrians.
TL;DR: people are hit by drivers, not cars. @ your favourite journalist.
The authors wrote three versions of a news article about a collision: a pedestrian-focused, a driver-focused and a thematically-framed (i.e., putting the crash in the context of other similar crashes) version.
Around 1000 people were given one of these versions to read, and then were asked a series of questions about who was to blame, what the punishment should be, and how to improve safety.
This study is from Sweden, which has a pretty robust cycling culture (although the study is 20 years old and it was a bit different then). The authors differentiated between people who frequently bike in the winter, don't bike in the winter, infrequently bike or never bike.
Study participants were asked to rank the importance of factors influencing what mode of transport they took.
Those who biked in summer but not in winter rated precipitation, road condition and temperature as the most significant reasons for not choosing bikes in the winter.