The @washingtonpost editorial board wrote a reasonable piece on the rising rates of violent crime confronting the country right now. But there's an important point that they, and others, are leaving out... washingtonpost.com/opinions/viole…
Many in media and politics are finally citing "community-based" efforts to reduce violence and the evidence showing they can reduce shootings and killings. That's good. Very good. But what they leave out is this...
The "community-based" anti-violence intervention with the strongest results is not EXCLUSIVELY run by the community. In fact, it is a police-community partnership called focused deterrence, the violence reduction initiative, or sometimes just ceasefire.
In Oakland, researchers documented a large reduction in gun violence after focused deterrence was initiated. The intervention was credited with cutting shootings in the city in half. Mayor @LibbySchaaf recently discussed this on our @CouncilonCJ webinar. counciloncj.org/page/Reducing-…
Looking across the country, a rigorous @Campbell_CrmJst systematic review of focused deterrence found positive results in 19 of 24 evaluations it examined. And these results were large, not just statistically significant. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
The strategy, among many others, is also profiled in my book #BleedingOut. basicbooks.com/titles/thomas-…
What does this mean for policy? It means that we need to remember we need BOTH the community AND law enforcement fully committed to preserving safety while delivering justice. It can't be one or the other.
Yes, we should scale up street outreach, hospital-based interventions, cleaning and greening, and other non-enforcement anti-violence options. But those efforts should be coordinated with the work of police and prosecutors.
We need cops and communities to come together. That's hard to say politically in some corners, but if we really care about saving lives, we must have the courage to follow what the science is telling us. And that science says it's not either police or communities, it's both.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Abt

Thomas Abt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Abt_Thomas

25 Jun 20
Today @Arnold_Ventures is releasing a new report by @UMSL_CCJ's Richard Rosenfeld and I on #violence and #COVID19. Links and takeaways below.
First the links. You can find the report here: craftmediabucket.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/COVID-…
And our interview about the report here: arnoldventures.org/stories/covid-…
Read 18 tweets
6 Jun 20
"Defunding the police" is a terrible idea that won't serve anyone well - not communities, not police, not anybody. Here are just a few reasons why. washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost…
First, "defunding" would put police and communities in competition with another for funding, precisely at the time when they need to be working together more closely. It's a wedge policy at the worst possible moment.
In LA, police and street outreach leaders used to lobby for each other at city council budget hearings. Will that continue after Garcetti's decision to slash police budgets? latimes.com/california/sto…
Read 7 tweets
17 Jun 17
1/ Sessions put his reasons for DOJ’s sentencing policy in print, so now we can show just how wrong he is. Read on.
washingtonpost.com/opinions/jeff-…
2/ “Drug trafficking is inherently violent.” Yes & no. Violence accompanies any illegal activity, but drug dealing much less violent today.
3/ In 1980s & 90s, the crack trade was notoriously dangerous, and experts agree it drove much of the violence and crime back then.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(