(Part 1) S3 Partners have reported 16.01M shorted shares sold short covered. $AMC

How is that even possible?

Relax. Take a deep breath.

Let's wait for Ortex if they are showing the same correlation of such similar change. Peer-review and reassess intel!
(Part 2) Let's not forget S3 Partners is speculatively owned by Citadel. Regardless of the documentation out there, there are no concrete proof to prove this connection - but it is healthy to challenge ourselves to give the benefit of the doubt - and being cautious.
(Part 3) Ortex and S3 Partners are distinctive proprietary analytical platforms and they receive information based on whatever institutions are authorized to give them.

We cannot blame them for doing their job of reporting regardless if it's false/true/delayed data.
(Part 4) Let's not forget the possibility of very few short sellers (minor institutions + retail) being forced to cover - avoiding further losses.
(Part 5) Be mindful of the possibility of spoofing the rate of negative SI % change through the option chain until they remove the loophole of synthetic calls until there is enforcement of applicable rulings.
(Part 6) A short squeeze is violent with crazy price swings up/down by the microsecond. It it usually done by short sellers if they are all simultaneously margin called - racing through to cover ASAP at the lowest price possible to cut down losses.
(Part 7) Remember we're still chasing after what's underneath the iceberg (naked shorts + synthetic shares + naked options).

We also have plenty of buying pressure - able to buy back that supply if shares are being covered at this stage. Look at Mudrick Capital Management, LP.
(Part 8) On that thought, this amount of "covering" didn't reflect into the price action.

Relax. Analyze. Reassess. Buy. Hold (not financial advice)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with CringleKitten

CringleKitten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CringleKitten

9 Jun
(Part 1) Anatomy of the bearish market (in a nutshell)

We're supposedly at the end of the bullish market (RED) with inflated stocks with margin, credit, and debt. Some stocks will undoubtedly melt-up (skyrocket) [this year - highly shorted securities are current plays]
(Part 2) Eventually, once the bearish market in in our doorstep - In order to preserve wealth, investors would be buying gold as fiat currency will lose value for gold to pick up in value. They are inversely proportional.

Nothing is gained. Nothing is lost. All is transformed.
(Part 3) On the first step of the bearish market (PINK), investors would be looking out for the true dip of the stock market / real estate and crypto.

Nobody knows when the market will reach the very bottom so be prepared to average down on your holdings.
Read 10 tweets
8 Jun
(Part 1) For $AMC - $GME

For those joining $CLOV right now based on the words of someone without doing their own due diligence, they are shooting themselves on the foot.
(Part 2) That's not investing. It's gambling. Remember, division of wealth at this current stage defuses the magnitude and the amplitude of a short squeeze.
(Part 3) Any wise investor would spend days, weeks, perhaps even months before investing into a stock. If there's any doubt of this point, you didn't do your homework.
Read 4 tweets
8 Jun
(Part 1) A bit of common sense and real talk $AMC

I have witnessed a lot of division as of late and I've told members of the community the closer we are into the endgame - The amount of FUD will be something we have never seen before - and the worst type of FUD is between apes.
(Part 2) There are lot of unnecessary drama going on with social media that this guy and this girl are creating division with apes just adding oil to the fire- transforming these situations into a freaking circus, blowing these out of proportions. It's embarrassing.
(Part 3) A certain individual has been offering his input for free through his prediction-based model built off on the idea of mass behavioral analysis of the market.

Understand the differences between a right and a privilege.
Read 23 tweets
7 Jun
(Part 1) What is the relation of the reverse repo market with highly shorted securities (such as $AMC, $GME, $KOSS etc.)?

As featured in @masked_investor livestream with @RogueTheLegacy , @ShortTheVix1 & @bigdawgstocks
(Part 2) The reverse repo market is essentially the FED acting as a pawn / maintenance shop borrowing from banks, effectively decreasing market liquidity in the financial world.
(Part 3) The FED and the government are two different entities - their interests don't always align with each other but their primary mandate is to serve the general interest of the public. Hold that thought.
Read 8 tweets
6 Jun
(Part 1) Remember the Big Short (2015)? - $AMC

A couple of geniuses finding out many B / BB mortgage bonds are defaulted and rating agencies covered everything making the public believing the market was still going strong because it's "good business" for banks.
(Part 2) These geniuses bought credit default swaps (CDS) and shorted the entire mortgage market betting against the stupidity of greedy institutions. When these bonds went bust, bankers were literally crying because these shorters controlled all of the supply needed to survive.
(Part 3) Fast forward with $AMC (& any highly shorted securities) - the bullish market lasted for so many years - many parties being overextended with large amount of margin, credit, and debt.
Read 6 tweets
5 Jun
(Part 1) Let's do some math! - $AMC

Based on the data reported to S3, there was a return of 1.4M shorted shares this week (1.6% of the total 88.2M shares sold short).
(Part 2) They covered 1.4M shorted shares while returning another 27.6M that they had borrowed for the sake of shorting but it was likely to be an awful idea due to risk exposure.

Now, we have an increasing amount of institutions prohibiting short selling.
(Part 3) If short sellers only covered 1.6% - the share price went up roughly 86%. If we're tracking this proportionally with the price increase per percentage point of SI covered going forward...
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(