.:Ibn Taymiyyah affirms RasūlAllāh ﷺ helps:.

Before I am accused of misquoting Ibn Taymiyyah, as certain individuals have a habit of doing so, I make it clear that Ibn Taymiyyah did not approve of this and condemned it harshly.
However, I will present those passages in which he affirms the reality of it, thus none may accuse me of deception for leaving out the parts of condemnation.

He states that though it is a reality, this does not make it permissible, whereas Najdīs deny the reality completely.
He writes:

“I know of a group from those who asked their needs from those in the graves, from the Prophets and the righteous, and their needs were fulfilled.”

[Iqtidā'a, 2/218]
Further:

“That which is narrated that people heard the return of the salām from the grave of Nabī ﷺ, or from the graves of others from among the righteous, and that Saýīd ibn al-Muşayyab would hear the Adhān from the grave during the nights of Ĥarrah, and similar to that.
All of this is reality, and is not which we are discussing, and the matter is more than that and greater.

Similarly, also that which is narrated, that a man went to the grave of Nabī ﷺ, and complained to him in the year of the drought, thus he saw him [in his dream],
and he commanded him to go to Úmar, thus he commanded him to go out and perform istisqā'a with the people. Indeed, this is not from this matter. The like of this takes place many times with the one who is less than Nabī ﷺ [i.e. a Walī], and I am aware of incidents of this.
Similarly, some of them asking the Nabī ﷺ for their need, or to other than him from his ummah, and it is fulfilled for him. For indeed, this has occurred many times.”

[Iqtidā'a, 2/254]
Here he clarifies that though Nabī ﷺ does fulfil the need, it is not proof of recommendation, according to him:

“It is upon you to know that the responding of Nabī ﷺ or other than him to these seekers is not from that which shows the recommendation of asking.”
Interestingly, he states that if Nabī ﷺ did not respond, this would harm the faith of the seekers:

“Most of these seekers due to their condition, if they were not responded to their faith would be harmed, just as those who asked him in his [worldly] life.”
“Thus, this extent, when it occurs, it is a karāmah of the inhabitant of the grave.”

“Similarly, what is mentioned from the karāmāt, and the breaking of norms, which is found at the graves of the Prophets and the righteous, such as the descending of lights and Angels near them,
and the repelling of Devils and beasts from them, and the driving away of fire from them and those around them, and the intercession of some of those around them from among the deceased [i.e. buried near them], and the preference of being buried near some of them,
and the achievement of serenity near them, and the descent of punishment for the one who desecrated them, then this kind of thing is true, and not from what we are discussing.

That which is in the graves of the Prophets and the righteous, from the karāmah of Allāh and His Mercy,
and what they possess with Allāh in terms of santicity and karāmah, is greater than that which most of the people imagine.”

[Taken from Iqtidā'a, 2/254-256]

Again, to clarify, I have selected relevant passages from these pages, and the rest is his condemnation of the act.
What is being pointed out here is that though he did not consider it permissible, he did not deny the reality of it. He considered all that is mentioned to occur in reality, as opposed to the Najdīs of today who laugh and mock, calling all this fairy tales and superstition.
Most importantly, he affirmed RasūlAllāh ﷺ and the Awliyā'a do help, and do fulfil the needs of those who ask them. He did not say as the blasphemous Wahābīs, who say, “he is dead, he is gone, he cannot help”, we seek Allāh's refuge from such statements.
I know that the Najdīs will try to accuse me of deception by not including the passages of condemnation, despite the fact I have made clear he considered the act forbidden.

It is hoped they too will accept the reality of all this as did Ibn Taymiyyah.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ابنِ خان

ابنِ خان Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IbneKhan01

8 Jun
.:Fatwā and Taqwā:.

Said Muĥammad ibn Muqātil al-Rāzī, may Allāh have mercy upon him:

“Even if I were given the world in its entirety I would not drink alcoholic drinks, meaning nabīdh of dates and raisins [i.e. other than khamr],
and if I were given the world in its entirety I would not give the verdict that it is impermissible [ĥarām].”

[Khulāşah al-Fatāwā]

The reason being that at his time the fatwā was given according to the opinion of Imām al-Aáżam, that alcoholic drinks other than khamr [i.e. wine]
with the condition that one does not become are permissible, intoxicated nor do so for merry-making as the sinners do.

However, for centuries the fatwā has been given according to the fatwā of Imām Muĥammad ibn al-Ĥasan al-Shaybānī, that all alcoholic drinks are prohibited.
Read 4 tweets
8 Jun
.:Authenticity of Fiqh al-Akbar:.

Abu’l Muntahā Shihābuddīn Aĥmad ibn Muĥammad al-Maghnīsāwī [d. 1000 AH / 1592 CE] writes in his commentary:

“Says the weak, sinful slave Abu’l Muntahā, may Allāh, the Most Great and the Most Generous, protect him from errors, sins,
and corrupt, futile beliefs that the book Fiqh al-Akbar, which was authored by Imām al-Aáżam, is an authentic and accepted book.”
Mullā Álī ibn Sulţān al-Qārī al-Ĥanafī [d. 1014 AH / 1605 CE] writes in his commentary of Fiqh al-Akbar, Minaĥ al-Rawđ al-Az’har:

“Said Imām al-Aáżam, the Magnanimous, Most Eminent, in his book named Fiqh al-Akbar...”
Read 26 tweets
6 Jun
.:Origination of the world:.

“When it has been established* that the world is originated, and it is known that anything originated must have an originator, for by necessity it is impossible that there be a preponderance in favour of one of the two alternatives of something Image
possible [i.e. of it existing and of it not existing] without there being a determiner, it is established that the world has an originator.”

— Imām Sáduddīn Masúūd al-Taftāzānī al-Ĥanafī [d. 791 AH / 1389 CE] in Sharĥ al-Áqā’id
* That is, when it has been established by evidence that the world is originated, preceded by non-existence, and it is known that its existence is not due to its own self, and its existence and non-existence is equal in the intellect,
Read 4 tweets
6 Jun
.:Raising the hands only at commencement:.

Said Ábdullāh ibn Masúūd:

“Shall I not pray for you the prayer of RasūlAllāh ﷺ?”

Thus, he prayed and did not raise his hands except for the first time.

Abū Ýīsā [al-Tirmidhī] said:

“The ĥadīth of Ibn Masúūd is a ĥasan ĥadīth. Image
More than one amongst the people of knowledge from the companions of Nabī ﷺ and the tābiýīn held this opinion, and it is the opinion of Sufyān al-Thawrī and the people of Kūfah.”

[Tirmidhī, #257]

Albānī grades this narration şaĥīĥ. Image
He also graded the same ĥadith şaĥīĥ in Mishkāt al-Maşābīĥ:

“The reality is that it is a şaĥīĥ ĥadith, and its isnād is şaĥīĥ upon the criteria of Muslim.”

[Mishkāt al-Maşābīĥ, pg. 254] Image
Read 31 tweets
1 Jun
.:The ambassador of Tripoli:.

In March 1786, Thomas Jefferson and and John Adams visited London in order to negotiate with Tripoli's ambassador, Sīdī Hajjī Ábd al-Rahmān.
Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to John Jay, dated March 28th 1786, regarding this meeting, in which he wrote:

“We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the Grounds of their pretentions to make war upon Nations who had done them no Injury,
and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation.

The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran,
Read 10 tweets
31 May
You forgot to mention that Sharh al-Sudūr was authored by Imām Suyūtī.

I suppose, according to you, he too was a follower of, "distortion, lies and folklore religion".
The first quote can be found on page 141:

In the Tārīkh of Ibn Najjār with his chain, from Abu'l Qāsim ibn Hibatullāh ibn Salām, the Mufassir [exegete], he said:

“We had a Shaykh whom we would recite to. One of his companions passed away, and the Shaykh saw him in his dream.
He asked him, ‘What did Allāh do with you?’

He replied, ‘He forgave me’

He asked, ‘How was your state with Munkar and Nakīr?’

He said, ‘O Ustād, when they made me sit and asked me, Who is your Lord and who is your Nabī?’

Allāh gave me ilhām [inspiration], that I say to them,
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(