Share this page!

qi7p1rc Profile picture
Twitter logo
9 Jun, 5 tweets, 5 min read
Use this example. Start draining the state budget through hate crime lawsuits and charges until the sheriff's act. IT'S THE LAW.
@WCSOOregon You guys catching on yet?
@ClackCoSheriff @MCSOInTheKnow @MultCoSO
The same ORS applies to all of you.
All employee and employer is criminally liable for hate crimes until YOU ACT SINCE YOU WONT LET ME. Which is a violation of HINDERING since I AM JUSTIFIED 161.195.
@AletheiaSatori @uarenotyrkhakis @66_odin @dcdraino @USAO_DC @RonDeSantisFL Call in ADP 3-28 title 32 (DSCA) with your national guard and come tell these Oregon officials to STEP ASIDE while I ARREST Kate brown and every Sr board/BAR member who should've stopped this.
@Dxron2

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with qi7p1rc

qi7p1rc Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @qi7p1rc

qi7p1rc Profile picture
10 Jun
"Mandated, Required, No entry without"

^Those are discriminatory wordings on signage against Conscientious Objection and Religious Preference, as they infer/imply that you will be denied access or rec. negative actions in some form, which is a violation of ORS 659A.030 >> ImageImageImageImage
The creation of these signs in obvious conflict with 659A.030, makes any/every OR employee and employer de facto guilty of 164.075, extortion of rights(intangible property) by implying legal or otherwise negative consequence, if your rights are not submitted. ImageImageImageImage
ORS law leaves NO ROOM for these kind of errors, and by def. creates de facto criminals out of Off.Misconduct, BECAUSE EVERY1 SHOULD BE ABLE TO READ CLEAR AND SIMPLE WORDING, AND FOLLOW POLICY AND LAW.

If you cannot, you by admission of self, do your job as you are incompetent. ImageImageImageImage
Read 8 tweets
qi7p1rc Profile picture
8 Jun
If everyone does this in their towns for mask mandates(every state has provisions for constitutional protections-FIND THEM), then we will either decertify and imprison so many corrupt cops for not helping, that eventually, the rest will fold and we will get our arrests. >> ImageImageImageImage
Decertify and Arrest every corrupt mother fucker who tries to keep the mandates. ImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets
qi7p1rc Profile picture
3 Jun
Oh man...@WCSOOregon has a Entire policy document on public embarrassment (public facing documents public.powerdms.com/WCOR/tree/docu… )...They just refused to take a criminal complaint last night, then they denied to file a report on BIAS BASED policing, which is in their PFD as prohibited.
Oof.
Man... did ya'll know you can report FELONIES involved with civil rights, such as Deprivation of rights by conspiracy of coercion to enforce involuntary servitude?

Did you know ANY US OFFICIAL or SUBDIVISION THEREOF, MUST BY LAW, TAKE ACTION TO PREVENT.
Did you know in Oregon there's a Fresh Pursuit Law (statute) that allows ANY #LEO, from #OR or SURROUNDING states, to give fresh pursuit in OR for FELONIES committed in #OR or surrounding states.what's a felony? ORS 431.180 18usc241>mask>PERJURY>Coercion>Invol.Servitud> EXTORTION
Read 24 tweets
qi7p1rc Profile picture
1 Jun
70 Am. Jur. 2nd Sec. 50, VII Civil Liability
“Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters,”

Nudd v. Burrows, 91 U.S 426. “Fraud vitiates everything”

Boyce v. Grundy, 3 Pet. 210 “Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments.”
Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914) “One who DRIVES an automobile is an operator within meaning of the Motor Vehicle Act.”
Pontius v. McClean 113 CA 452 “The word ‘operator’ shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation.” Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.833 >>
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @qi7p1rc has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @qi7p1rc!

Read all threads by @qi7p1rc

:(