Never forget! #Sheriff's stood by like pu$$ie$ for the last 7 years of #riots and #DomesticTerrorism.
The #blue never backed you.
They helped shut down businesses.
They helped governors kill the young and old.
They helped kidnap and extort you for not wearing a mask. #BackTheBlue
The #DomesticTerrorists would actually be completely powerless, if "#LawEnforcement" wasn't aiding and abetting, hindering prosecution, and failing and refusing to do their duties as the law dictates.
Interesting to think about... who's the real #EnemyOfThePeople here? 🤔
Mar 21 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Cops, DA's, judges, defense attorneys. All must act according to law.
Attorneys must act on *informed consent* and in accordance with law and RPC.
That means, if you demand they defend you according the laws that incriminate them for their conduct leading to arrest, they can't.
If attorneys *know or reasonably should know" how to defend you according to law and rules, then they cannot defend you outside of those restraints, nor can they prosecute, nor demand you follow their unlawful orders(including court orders deemed unlawful by law/ precedent).
Wrongful arrest case damage award, + inflation, calculated at 48hrs of incarceration.
@LaneSheriffOR better check your bank accounts. @LaneCountyGov@LaneCountyDA@EugenePolice
18 usc 2, 3, 4, 241...
242
371
872
1951
All violated by you guys. @AGAshleyMoody@AGEricSchmitt >>
The plaintiff is receiving federal financial assistance through the PPP, at the same time breaking federal law with a long standing pride in so doing. And will continue, with the @EugenePolice helping her due to their own embarrassment and incompetence, Extorting the innocent.
Jun 10, 2021 • 8 tweets • 11 min read
"Mandated, Required, No entry without"
^Those are discriminatory wordings on signage against Conscientious Objection and Religious Preference, as they infer/imply that you will be denied access or rec. negative actions in some form, which is a violation of ORS 659A.030 >>
The creation of these signs in obvious conflict with 659A.030, makes any/every OR employee and employer de facto guilty of 164.075, extortion of rights(intangible property) by implying legal or otherwise negative consequence, if your rights are not submitted.
Jun 9, 2021 • 5 tweets • 5 min read
Use this example. Start draining the state budget through hate crime lawsuits and charges until the sheriff's act. IT'S THE LAW. @WCSOOregon You guys catching on yet? @ClackCoSheriff@MCSOInTheKnow@MultCoSO
The same ORS applies to all of you.
All employee and employer is criminally liable for hate crimes until YOU ACT SINCE YOU WONT LET ME. Which is a violation of HINDERING since I AM JUSTIFIED 161.195.
Jun 8, 2021 • 4 tweets • 4 min read
If everyone does this in their towns for mask mandates(every state has provisions for constitutional protections-FIND THEM), then we will either decertify and imprison so many corrupt cops for not helping, that eventually, the rest will fold and we will get our arrests. >>
Decertify and Arrest every corrupt mother fucker who tries to keep the mandates.
Jun 3, 2021 • 24 tweets • 27 min read
Oh man...@WCSOOregon has a Entire policy document on public embarrassment (public facing documents public.powerdms.com/WCOR/tree/docu… )...They just refused to take a criminal complaint last night, then they denied to file a report on BIAS BASED policing, which is in their PFD as prohibited.
Oof.
Man... did ya'll know you can report FELONIES involved with civil rights, such as Deprivation of rights by conspiracy of coercion to enforce involuntary servitude?
Did you know ANY US OFFICIAL or SUBDIVISION THEREOF, MUST BY LAW, TAKE ACTION TO PREVENT.
Jun 1, 2021 • 16 tweets • 3 min read
70 Am. Jur. 2nd Sec. 50, VII Civil Liability
“Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters,”
Nudd v. Burrows, 91 U.S 426. “Fraud vitiates everything”
Boyce v. Grundy, 3 Pet. 210 “Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments.”
Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914) “One who DRIVES an automobile is an operator within meaning of the Motor Vehicle Act.”