As I have argued for yrs. good hitters know how to create movement that facilitates good hip rotation.
As I have argued, the legs do not CAUSE good hip rotation. But they can help or hinder hip rotation.
Note how quickly the back knee flexes --as they go into foot plant. This can help to "free up" [my term] the back hip rotation. Why?
Well, creating this quick flexion of the knee/ankle that in and of itself, facilitates a greater ease of back hip rotation. That's a kinesiological argument. The physics argument is that the knee flexion results in the upper leg[the thigh] to get CLOSER to the center mass .
This REDUCES the inertia of that segment in the context of the hip region overcoming angular inertia.
In effect, the knee flexion causing the upper thigh to become closer to the center of rotation facilitates a version of the "figure skater" effect.
That physics concept is typically applied to the figure skater increasing rotational speed [angular] via tucking the arms more into the body [closer to the center of rotation]. Same concept can be applied to the back leg flexion!
I recently received a msg asking about a recent tweet as regards the back leg flexion action. An action, I argued CAN help facilitate ["free up" as I sometimes say] the hip rotation.
Imagine if you as a parent brought your daughter to me to help her learn how to swing the bat better.
Then later you learn that as a predicate to this expectation, I spent several hours with her mandating that she watch a Netflix "documentary"[sic] on America's historic racism.
And further I then demanded that in order for me to allow her to hit with me I insisted that, in no manner, could she question the quality/accuracy/fairness etc., of the documentary. What would you think of me as a teacher of hitting?
Would you deem this as an acceptable part of the exchange of your money for my expertise----in the context of a teacher of hitting?
Recently, I have seen assertions that MLB strike out/low average is simply a function of ....trying to swing more "up". I don't think so. Simply put, MLB hitters are there because they conform to the "building code" standard as set forth by Paul Nyman some yrs. back [pcr/pcrw].
Simply put, according to this standard, they know how to create very good posture, connection, rotation, such that they are able to hit high level pitching.
So, what really best explains the high strikeout/low average combination.
Regardless as to whether one loathes or idolizes Trump, I am hard pressed to see how this chart displays a positive trend for citizens of the U.S.
As one NYT writer/author wrote about some yrs. back, those countries who do not make things cannot then innovate to any real degree ,i.e., you have to make things in order to then improve [innovate] upon those things. Bottom line:
A phrase that I have seen about hitting over the yrs. is along the lines of things like: The hitter needs to be more athletic, or, you are taking the athleticism out of the hitter.
One operative principle I have utilized over the yrs. for many such assertions is that of ......
...questioning the premise. In the case of the phrase "you're taking away the hitter's athleticism" it amounts to asking: "Define athleticism."
Here's one dictionary version: "the physical qualities that are characteristic of athletes, such as strength, fitness, and agility."
But this definition, similar to the above "taking away athleticism" is equally vague in that ALL athletes have SOME degree of, "strength, fitness, agility."
And one more thing for tonight [before I return to my bunker to read a bunch of shit!]; Not too long ago, someone blocked me ---apparently as a result of me simply pointing out that I thought their description/analysis of a hitter was flawed.
In no manner [I don't think] could my argument be construed as any kind of personal attack. Simply put, I disagreed with their interpretation and tried explain this based on my understanding of movement [based on 20 yrs. of practical and technical info].
Rather than trying to engage me he simply blocked me. Those who know me know that I am someone who is well practiced in the art of engaging all kinds of views on things. MY operative view is: