As more and more layer 1's begin to flourish with their own ecosystems of users, DeFi and Dapps, we decided to take a look into how each of the smaller L1's compare on a variety of metrics.
1. Market Cap
2. Number of Addresses
This can provide an effective surface-level view of the number of users on a particular chain.
$SOL $LUNA $ETH $EOS $DOT $FTM $AVAX
3. Addresses/Market Cap
This basically tells us what value the market has assigned for each address within the individual blockchain. The higher the number, the higher the market values each additional address within that L1.
4. DeFi TVL/Market Cap
This tells us the ratio of DeFi value locked within a L1 to its market cap. The higher the number, the higher the market value's value locked within that particular L1. This can potentially point to more capital-efficient chains.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nexus Mutual is currently the leading insurance platform in the space. Time will tell whether or not the insurance model will last, as although it improves upon a P2P model, in theory, it's less efficient than a pooled model.
2/ In terms of the fund, Nexus Mutual is currently stuck at a 100% MCR, and has been for all of 2021. There is a minimum capital requirement of 162,425 ETH. This means that no one can swap out of NXM, but only out of WNXM, which is a liquid version of NXM.
3/ WNXM ($59.34) trades at an extreme discount to NXM ($89.83) because it essentially serves as the price to pay for exit liquidity.
Anyone that wants to be a cover provider will have to face this illiquid issue, potentially making it less desirable to use Nexus Mutual at all.
Why @BalancerLabs will step into the spotlight as Defi's most Flexible and Efficient AMM [Thread]
$BAL was one of the first AMM's to provide liquidity through pools weighted by multiple tokens, unlike competitors such as $UNI offering 50/50 currency pairs 1/n
The customizability of $BAL pools includes 6 pool variables and 3 pool types for liquidity providers to chose from, significantly more than traditional AMM's 3/n
Measures the value of each $ locked in the protocol. Protocols that trade at higher multiples are not necessarily overvalued, as they often generate more revenue per $ of TVL
$UNI $AAVE $MKR $COMP
2. FDV/TVL
Similar to the previous metric except now we are looking at the fully diluted value (if all coins were in circulation).
$UNI $AAVE $MKR $COMP $SNX $SUSHI $YFI $CRV
3. Annual Revenue / TVL
This shows how much each $ locked generates in revenue. This metric helps explain the MKT/TVL ratio as it is clear the market assigns a premium for protocols that are more capital efficient.
Why @SushiSwap is one of the most overlooked DeFi protocols. [Thread]
Many see $Sushi as simply another AMM competitor to Uniswap. However, Sushi’s plans are to be more than just a DEX. They want to be the home of DeFi through the creation of a synergistic ecosystem. 1/n
@SushiSwap has partnered with several of the most well known DeFi protocols as part of their aggressive expansion strategy. These partnerships will allow Sushi to tap into additional liquidity and further build their Moat.
Let’s take a look into the various aspects of Sushi.
SushiSwap is the most well known part of the SushiSwap ecosystem. Similar to $UNI it uses a constant product market maker. Sushi does about 20% of all DEX volume and is expanding to become multi chain 3/n