War crimes are war crimes and dead babies are dead babies regardless the perpetrator. The idea that war crimes by democracies are somehow more morally justified than war crimes by extremist groups is ludicrous, and offensive to the victims.
In fact *democracies* should be the ones held up to a higher standard and put under more scrutiny *because* they're democracies. Because they represent the will of an entire people (not a band of militants), and because they represent the concept of democracy itself.
When an extremist group kills innocent people they do not do so while being legitimate representatives of an entire people. Their crime is then theirs only, not a crime facilitated and backed by the will and resources of an entire nation. It shames them, not an entire nation.
When a democracy commits war crimes, the anger that follows is never about the crime alone. It's also about every member of that democracy because the crime was committed in their name. It's also about the very concept of democracy that can be used so cynically and hypocritically
It's both pathetic and revealing seeing the American political establishment - I'm talking the Democrat establishment this time - react when brown people simply speak out their minds about their actual lived realities. Our normal political common sense is that offensive to them.
White supremacy is such a force, and not only on the political right. Will you ever learn that the lived realities and political sensibilities of the rest of the planet are as valid as your own? Or will you throw a hissy fit every time something we say triggers your fragility?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with İyad el-Baghdadi | إياد البغدادي

İyad el-Baghdadi | إياد البغدادي Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @iyad_elbaghdadi

11 Jun
Confession: I am guilty of being unhelpful in debates and in valuing zingers over discussions, but when I look within I see that this is coming from a *profound* exasperation and frustration with endless discussion that does nothing to alleviate the pain that we are coming from
Instead, many of these "debates" center the opinions and objections and comfort of those who do not seem to give a damn about us. Nothing changes. Yes I'm sometimes "unhelpful" and unwilling to debate because my idea of what is or isn't worth debating has been changing.
I have limited time, energy, and mindspace to try to convince an endless queue of people that our lived experiences are valid, that we deserve dignity, that the current system is extremely oppressive and racist against us, that we've been screwed over, and that we deserve better.
Read 5 tweets
9 Jun
I'm a Palestinian Muslim and I don't need your support if this is how you think. We fight for everyone who is oppressed, we don't pick and choose which oppressed people to assist and which to ignore based upon their sect.
"يا أيها الذين آمنوا كونوا قوامين بالقسط شهداء لله ولو على أنفسكم أو الوالدين والأقربين إن يكن غنيا أو فقيرا فالله أولى بهما فلا تتبعوا الهوى أن تعدلوا وإن تلووا أو تعرضوا فإن الله كان بما تعملون خبيرا" Qur'an 4:135
"يا أيها الذين آمنوا كونوا قوامين لله شهداء بالقسط ولا يجرمنكم شنآن قوم على ألا تعدلوا اعدلوا هو أقرب للتقوى واتقوا الله إن الله خبير بما تعملون" Qur'an 5:8
Read 4 tweets
7 Jun
Your proposed solution of a problem depends upon your conception of the problem. In my 20 year career in strategy, I've seen people mess up *bad* because they're unwilling to let go of their definition of the problem, or to consider that maybe their definition is only one layer.
It's like they want their problem definition to be right more than they want the problem to be solved. I mean fine if it's a personal problem then you have every right to mess up your own life, but if it's at a social, national, or global level then... no.
Here are all (?) the layers to the struggle for justice in Palestine:
- A struggle against military occupation
- A struggle against extremist ethno-nationalism
- A struggle against apartheid
- A struggle against settler-colonialism
- A struggle against neocolonialism
Read 5 tweets
7 Jun
Stream of consciousness thread. A recurring debate in anti-authoritarian conversations is whether overthrowing authoritarian orders is simply a matter of the oppressed adopting the right organization/strategy, or whether there always needs to be external action to tip the scales
It's an ongoing debate. If an authoritarian system firmly dominates a society, is overthrowing it always possible without any intervention? By "intervention" here I mean it in the broadest sense, including measures in the diplomatic, economic, media, etc realms
I think the question is moot because in the real world, there are no closed systems where it's nothing but the oppressors and the oppressed face to face with no external parties involved. Most authoritarian systems have significant, institutional, continuous external support
Read 11 tweets
6 Jun
The world is changing. The previously crushed are not yet powerful, but no longer powerless. If you went after members of a marginalized group in 2000, you may well get away with it. If you try the same shit in 2021, there will be a price. We'll all make sure there's a price.
Will the price be big enough to deter, or will it be more an inconvenience? Will it make a difference on the short term, or only the longer term? All of those are valid questions and a lot of it depends on what we do. But the point stands that this shit isn't cost-free any more.
You want to beat journalists? Rip apart families? Deport vulnerable refugees? You think it'll help you at the polls to kill a few more children or crush a few more asylum seekers? There will be a cost. People will organize and go after you for the rest of their lives and yours.
Read 5 tweets
5 Jun
All attempts to "save the culture" of countries with disfavorable demographics by restricting migration + attempting to boost native birth rates will fail and may actually cause more damage. The only way to actually save the culture is to have an attractive culture
Focusing on having more humans of the "right" ethnic descent isn't only cringy, it's also a failed strategy. This is just maths. No modern country has ever managed to boost natural birth rate back to 2.1 after a generation-long (or even shorter) demographic maturation
Long term, your country will either die a slow demographic death, or it'll have more humans of a different mix of genetic descent. If you choose demographic survival, the question is what culture all these new humans will embrace. Hence the focus on having an attractive culture
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(