BREAKING: Green v. Alachua County. #MaskMandates are "presumptively unconstitutional" under Florida law
Here’s a link to the entire opinion. The bottom line, any mask mandate must serve a compelling state interest and be narrowly tailored to serve that need. To meet this standard, strong evidence that #masks are effective would need to be presented.
Judge Tanenbaum refers to #maskmandates as "diktat" and says "The threat of government-sponsored shaming was not an idle one"
🔥🔥This ruling is savage!! : Plaintiff "reasonably could expect autonomy over his body, including his face, which means that he was correct to claim an entitlement to be let alone and free from intrusion by Alachua County’s commission chairman" and the #maskmandate
🚨🔥 Epic judicial smackdown: “even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten...And there is this warning from William Pitt the Younger...paraphrasing a similar sentiment in...Paradise Lost: “Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.”
🎤💧"Fundamental right..to..complete freedom of a person to control his own body" means "a person can reasonably expect not to be forced by the government to put something on his own face against his will" #Masks#maskmandate
This means the case goes back to the trial judge to reconsider the injunction using this ruling as a guide. Or, the County could ask the FL Supreme Ct to hear a discretionary appeal seeking to reverse this particular ruling. So the case isn't over. Will be interesting to follow
Fulton DA #FaniWillis asks the Georgia Supreme Court to put her back on her RICO case against @realDonaldTrump and the other defendants
The GA Supreme Court does NOT have to take her appeal
She's asking the court to hear her appeal on a discretionary basis
Questions Presented:
Did the Court of Appeals err in disqualifying a district attorney, divesting her of her constitutional authority to investigate and prosecute crimes, based solely upon an appearance of impropriety and absent a finding of an actual conflict of interest or forensic misconduct?
She says the Court of Appeals got it wrong by making new precedent, as opposed to following established precedent
(Note: In fact, the Court of Appeals got it right)
Assuming arguendo that an actual conflict of interest or actual impropriety is not required to authorize disqualification, did the Court of Appeals err in substituting the trial court’s discretion with its own and becoming the first Georgia court to reverse a trial court’s order declining to disqualify a district attorney based solely upon an appearance of impropriety
The Georgia Court of Appeals has disqualified Fulton DA #FaniWillis from the RICO case against @realDonaldTrump
🚨🚨
"we reverse the trial court’s denial of the appellants’ motion to disqualify DA Willis and her office. As we conclude that the elected district attorney is wholly disqualified from this case, “the assistant district attorneys — whose only power to prosecute a case is derived from the constitutional authority of the district attorney who appointed them — have no authority to proceed"
A team of #FaniWillis prosecutors engineered an illegal ex parte meeting in the #YoungThug trial - when defense lawyer complained he was ordered to jail - illegally
@AshleighMerchan files Motion for Contempt of Court against Fulton DA #FaniWillis
"According to social media posts, as of September 17, 2024, Ms. Willis was in Los Angeles, California attending fundraising events for her re-election campaign"
"Ms. Willis is under lawful subpoena, and she has not filed a motion to quash, nor could she. She is simply flouting this Court’s lawful process, apparently intent on playing a game of chicken with the Court"