The fantasy: gender-critical women planning to bomb Stonewall.
The reality: gender-critical women discussing whether wool might be employed as an effective tool of protest.
The reality: gender-critical women discussing whether wool might be employed as an effective tool of protest.
In case it’s not clear, I’m referring to the furious imaginings of gender-critical activity being thrown around over the last couple of days.
Terrorists? 🙄
Terrorists? 🙄
I spend most of my Saturday afternoons listening to international women talk about their domestic campaigns, then chatting with groups of women about various aspects of law, news, and required actions.
A more anti-violence group you could not hope to meet.
A more anti-violence group you could not hope to meet.
Use of ‘anti’ is deliberate. The gender-critical women I talk with are not merely ‘non’-violent , they are positively ‘anti’-violent, viewing it as a male-typical expression or strategy to be wholly rejected.
Which brings us back to the opening tweet, and the fantastical projection of male-typical violent strategies onto groups of women who are, in reality, organising around letters, the occasional sign and a whole heap of art/craft.
Tooled up. 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
