The idea of a digital dashboard is like the dashboard in your vehicle. It is a display of all relevant data related to driving (Vehicle speed, distance travelled, fuel status, possible engine issues).
With a quick glance you get all this information and you can focus on driving.
This would be relevant in the digital realm, a dashboard of indicators and statuses that help you get to your destination, focus your energies & avoid problems.
Today, while there are digital dashboard technologies out there, it seems their promised future has gone unfulfilled.
My opinion is this: the digital dashboard concept was too focused on pulling in external data to the dashboard from diverse external sources, which actually proves to be very difficult to do in reality.
But the bigger issue lies in that we as individuals often don't have a good understanding of our own "internal data": What is relevant/irrelevant in my world? What drives smart decision making for me?
Lesson: Dont worry about the external, understand your own internal needs 1st!
This is where tools like #roam and other #TfT tools might help us, we can in effect build our own GTD Dashboards, customized to our world and priorities.
This is why I am an advocate of having PKM & GTD systems in one graph or vault.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Over two months ago I released workBench (wB), part of roam42, now maintained by @dvargas92495. A while back I promised @cortexfutura that I would explain a little of my motivation behind it. It is an amazing tool to help you work with your graph as it grows.
workBench is complex since it is keyboard driven. We learn quicker when something visual & we use the mouse. But it is more about working with the unseen than the seen. I can’t emphasize enough that if you spend a few hours with it, it will benefit you.
In summary, wB allows you to work with parts of your graph that are not currently visible. Example 1: you are working on a block & want to move it or block ref it to another point of your graph not currently visible. Without leaving your current context, wB allows you to do this.
This requires a few tweets to answer. I do trust cloud services. You can use @Tresorit which is zero trust e2e encryption. @obsdmd also has a service called “Obsidian Sync” which allows for cloud based zero trust (you provide your own encryption key).
Of course using any program on a local computer requires a level of trust with the vendor. This is true just using Windows, or Mac OS. So I trust @obsdmd, especially on the foundation of their openness and approachability.
Plugins are not necessary to use. But I do use a few. Of course as a JS dev, I can audit the code myself, but not everyone can do that. however the obsidian model currently is “safer” (not guaranteed safe). Why do I say that?
1/ This is a good article from @davewiner, let us call him one of the founding fathers of modern outliners. He has been outlining for decades, this means he has gained insight into them in the school of "experience". Worth reading and pondering his ideas.
2/ He released ThinkTank in 1983. Ran with the ad: "See what you think." Made for people.... interested in tools that could make their thinking more powerful, as a spreadsheet. Does it look & sound familiar? Yep, outliners have been around a long-time.
3/ the new generation of TfT tools has inspired him to stay committed. I am happy to hear that. Happy to hear Dave will continue to blog and talk about outliners as a tool for thinkers. Interestingly he mentions:
1/ Years ago I used something called paper, often with a pencil or pen. Maybe you have seen these ancient writing instruments in a museum. For handwritten notes, I used the Cornell Note taking system. I really liked it, it worked so well! Here is what a Cornell note looks like:
2/ Basically you write the topic in the header, take notes in main part of the page, then in left column write brief highlights (like callouts). Then at the end, you write a summary of the main ideas.
3/ The benefit of the system is that it forced me to make very brief summaries of my notes as I was taking notes, and then to think about how to best summarize the whole lesson or research in the end. This method served as a way of being mentally active in the learning process
This tweet generated some interesting alternatives to Zettelkasten. Let me list off a few. If you have some you have found not in my list, let me know.
1/ Really interesting question Mark poses here. Basically many now see blocks as fundamental building pieces in their Tools for Thought (a competitive advantage). However, the block itself is really a concept to make it easier for users to comprehend/visualize the data element.
2/ In other words, a block doesn't really exist. It is an abstraction for us as users to the underlying data store. What is crucial for understanding with these systems, is that each data element (block) is represented by an internal identifier that makes that data unique.
3/ This is actually what is important. Each block has its own address, which makes it easier to find, get to and reuse elsewhere. I explain this here: