(Thread) Susan B. Anthony

“Is it too late to save democracy?”
“Will the fascists win?”

I answered these questions by talking about Susan B. Anthony.

(Talking for 10 minutes to my Ipad is feeling less weird each week)
Subtitle: Everything you never knew you wanted to know about Susan B. Anthony

If you prefer an [edited] transcript, it’s here: terikanefield.com/susan-b-anthon…
I’ll come back and do a brief Twitter summary.
But first, more ☕️

2/
I think we start with the fact that there will always be people trying to undermine democracy, and they are motivated and acting from fear and desperation.

Then, when they land a blow, instead of reeling with shock, we figure out how to respond.
See:

3/
One of the more interesting (and painful) incidents in Susan B. Anthony's life was the fallout among the liberals (reformers) after the Civil War when women were left out of the 14th and 15th Amendments.

The biggest setback for women's rights came from liberal men.

4/
The women activists (they called themselves 'reformers') also split into two groups. They carried anger and bitterness for decades.

There is a lesson. If your goal is to destroy or take the nation backwards, there is only one direction (go back where we were).

5/
If you want to go forward, there are lots of different directions and possibilities. Progressives rarely agree on the best way forward.

There are other reasons liberals tend to splinter while right-wing fascists stay in formation, but this splintering weakens progressives.

6/
Adding to the unhealthy situation is that spreading despair and laying out simple fallacies "If X doesn't happen, all will be lost," garners a lot of attention.

Fear grabs people.

People like Susan B. Anthony ignore the noise, deal with the despair, and do the work.

7/
I checked my YouTube analytics (social media platforms give too much info!).

When "fascism" or lies from the Republican Party is in the title, lots of people look.

But Susan B. Anthony? Less popular.

Well. Like Susan B., I must remain committed to an unpopular cause 😉

8/
Agree.

This was tweeted before this thread, and it's what I was trying to say.

The idea that something will happen, some X and the Democrats will win and the anti-democratic forces will be forever beaten leads to despair and anger.


9/
The idea that there is a magic bullet leads to despair when X happens but the anti-democratic forces regroup and come back to hit harder, and it leads to anger if X doesn't happen.


"If X doesn't happen, all will be lost" says there is only one way.

10/

That's why she's also one of my heroes. I read her memoir but never did a Twitter book report on it. Maybe it's time.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

14 Jun
McConnell is a master at norm and democracy-smashing behavior.

First, he announces that he will not "allow" the president to do what the Constitution gives the president power to do.

This stokes his base ("We're going to win!")

The opposition splinters over how to respond.
From Levitsky (co-author of 👇) the greatest danger to democracy is the government slipping into dysfunction, which will erode public confidence.

When public confidence erodes, people become vulnerable to the appeal of a strongman, who promises to get things done.

1/
When the public loses confidence in democracy, they are willing to torpedo democratic processes. Using anti-democratic means to save democracy has obvious problems.

McConnell wants to break the government because he doesn't like what America has become.

2/
Read 4 tweets
12 Jun
Anti-Hardball Tactics

The GOP is an anti-system party willing to torpedo democratic institutions to retain dominance.

Q: Should Democrats fight like Republicans?

Georgetown Law prof. David Pozen offers an answer and a solution. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
1/ If you haven’t noticed, Republicans have been engaging in hardball tactics.

I'm being ironic. Of course, you noticed.

Constitutional Hardball tactics are technically within the rules, but shocking, norm-breaking, and destructive.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
2/ Hardball tactics are carried out within the law, but subvert the spirit of the law.

Example: McConnell refusing to allow Obama to appoint a Supreme Court justice.
Read 12 tweets
11 Jun
Abusing power and assaulting the separation of powers was a hallmark of the Trump administration.

If I recall, he was even impeached for abusing his powers and the Republicans gave him a pass.
Just a friendly reminder that if the people who abused power are not held "accountable," it's because they are being shielded by a major political party that holds a lot of power.

You can't say Schiff and Swalwell haven't been doing their best.
Underestimating how entrenched the anti-democratic forces are? Unreasonable expectations? Thinking change can be swift?

Think about what would be happening right now if Trump was in the White House and compare.
Read 4 tweets
11 Jun
Wait. I thought these were the people complaining that their First Amendment rights were violated by demands for political correctness.

I'm so confused.
Mask mandates are tyranny, but teachers wearing body cameras is perfectly reasonable.
😕

I'm making jokes, even though it isn't funny (well, it sort of is)

This is how Fox and Newsmax keep their base riled up and engaged.
Read 4 tweets
10 Jun
Just pointing out that for a conspiracy to be a crime, the goal didn't have to be a violent attack.

A conspiracy to stop or interfere with the voting in Congress would be enough to make it a crime.

reuters.com/world/us/three…
You can see this is what they're charged with: Conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding.

This, I think, is the flaw in Giuliani's First Amendment defense. He says you there isn't evidence he intended violence.

But did he intend to interfere with the counting of the votes?
Interfering with the counting of the votes is "lawless" under the Brandenburg v Ohio standard.

The standard doesn't require violence. It requires "lawlessness."

A subtle distinction, but a distinction.
oyez.org/cases/1968/492
Read 5 tweets
10 Jun
(Thread) Fear and Desperation

In this fabulous lecture, Harvard prof. Steven Levitsky explains that the Republicans are engaging in hardball tactics because they feel their backs are to the wall and they're desperate.
If this is the kind of thing I've been saying, it's because I've been reading Levitsky's work for years. He writes about democracies in Latin America, democratic erosion, and competitive authoritarianism. He's also a co-author of 👇

1/
Also, 👇
His point: For most of the 20th century, American politics "worked."

That’s because through the 1970s, both parties culturally and demographically similar.

Specifically, they were white. White men controlled all major American institutions.

2/
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(