There’s clearly differences of opinion in the $TSLA community about TSLA’s strategy and it’s impact on stock price. I’ll try to explain why these different views exist, and offer my perspective on why TSLA’s stock is lagging in the face of so many potential positive catalysts.
2/ First, some perspective:
1) $TSLA remains my largest position at ~15%. I don’t see this changing anytime soon
2) There’s a difference between price and value; price is what you pay; value is what you get
3) TSLA sells every EV it makes. This will likely continue through 2022.
3/ I tend to look out 3-5 years when assessing the value of a company. For TSLA, I project earnings out to 2025, apply a 2025 P/E that captures future expected growth, and discount it back to the present. My current $TSLA present value of $1,000 compares to a current $610 price.
4/ $TSLA ‘s +743% gain last year was the result of the market realizing global EV adoption was accelerating, that TSLA TAM would triple from 24% to ~85% as TSLA entered CUVs (M-Y), pickups (Cytruck), TSLA’s success in China, the 5:1 stock split, and getting added to the S&P 500.
5/ 2021 again started strong after S&P inclusion, with investors hopeful $TSLA would beat in 4Q, offer strong FY deliv guidance, and active PMs with S&P bms would go to a 1.5% weight out of fear of underperforming. TSLA reached a high of $883 on 1/26, one day before 4Q results.
6/ Three things happened, which changed $TSLA momentum:
1) TSLA missed 4Q EPS by 22% after 5 consec qtrly beats
2/ TSLA failed to provide 2021 vol guidance, reiterating long-term growth goal of 50%
3/ TSLA bought $1.5B #btc, causing P/E dilution and EV share of voice to plunge
7/ $TSLA stock fell -36% in the next 40 days, vs NDX fell -8%. Long term Treas yields spiked from 1.05% to 1.74%, although they’ve since retreated to 1.47%. $TSLA is now -14% YTD, while Nasdaq 100 is within a hair from a new all time high, up +9% YTD.
8/ $TSLA 2021 and 2022 earnings ests have moved higher, so TSLA’s P/E has been crushed. This suggests the market is not worried about near term earnings (TSLA sells every EV it makes), but remains wary of TSLA’s long term growth, with every auto mfr now focused on selling EVs.
9/Many investors are worried that $TSLA 3-5 year growth will fall short of expectations, either because TSLA won’t adapt to the new landscape as competitors launch their own EVs, or it gets distracted from its mission of accelerating the world’s transition to sustainable energy.
10/ Many investors look to the smartphone industry a decade ago to understand how competitive dynamics might evolve in EVs over the next few years. On the Android side, HTC is an example of a market leader with products that stood out for their technical superiority and design.
11/ HTC ethos of “quietly brilliant” and reluctance to advertise was based on their view that the product spoke for itself. From 2009-12, HTC share of Android phones fell from 67% to 20%, as Samsung share grew from 4% to 27%. AAPL destroyed RIMM and Nokia on the non-Android side.
12/ With 60 new competitor EVs set to launch over the next 24 months, TSLA must lay out a plan to differentiate its EVs from others. TSLA clearly doesn’t have to advertise now. But TSLA needs to start putting in place the “soft infrastructure” to fight the coming EV onslaught.
13/ So why has $TSLA stock been weak despite so many positive catalysts? Many point to mgmt’s clear reluctance to evolve from the strategy that got it here - focus on production; let superior design/technology sell itself - while competitors all aggressively push their new EVs.
14/I believe @elonmusk will realize this and evolve before it’s too late. While fanboys argue there’s no need for advertising / PR, China events over the past few months suggest otherwise. One has to fight the FUD (e.g. alleged faulty brakes) or it will impact brand/future sales.
15/ The argument that $TSLA sells every EV it makes so doesn’t need to advertise is short-sighted. It fails to look 3-5 years out when every auto manufacturer is focused on growing EV share as they convert to an all EV world, and spending $ billions in advertising to get there.
16/Some will argue I should just sell my stock. That’s immature. I love $TSLA: It has by far the best products, superior technology, first mover advantage, full TAM, lowest cost, iconic brand, revered CEO. TSLA needs to plan for where the EV world is headed, not where it’s been.
Many here are viewing the world as it exists today, not how it will evolve over the next 3-5 years. TSLA clearly doesn’t need to advertise today, but it needs to start building the foundation for better communications in the same way $AAPL did. The two are not mutually exclusive.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gary Black

Gary Black Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garyblack00

24 May
Of course $TSLA would want to understand the intricacies of Lidar and install it on one of their cars. That’s what competitors do. $AAPL bought dozens of Samsung phones to see how their tech measured up to Apple’s. It doesn’t mean TSLA wants to add Lidar to FSD. $LAZR
My only criticism: Why would $tsla put its own license plate on the car with Lidar? These guys don’t think.
$TSLA benchmarking their camera-centric self-driving system against lidar makes perfect sense. Testing it for future use with cameras in FSD does not.
Read 4 tweets
22 May
$TSLA -18% YTD vs NDX +4% can be viewed positively or negatively. On one hand many long only PMs and HFs have exited given the noise. On the other, vol and eps estimates continue to rise, so TSLA intrinsic value hasn’t changed. Against my $1,000 PT, TSLA now has +72% upside.
Before 6/30 qtr/end, several potential catalysts may help:

1/ June 3 Model S Plaid unveil - showing off the worlds fastest production car (0-60 in 1.9 sec) has no downside. It will get the media talking again about how great Tesla cars are, instead of its $1.5B stake.
2/ FSD v9 launch/subscription plan - This one’s tough. If priced right ($99/mo first year), TSLA will get a high take rate, and the launch could be very positive. If priced too high, with low acceptance, the FSD v9 release may be branded by the media as just a driver assist aid.
Read 6 tweets
22 May
The debate between $TSLA longs and shorts comes down to this: Will the slew of new EV competition cause TSLA growth to slow as EV adoption soars? As EV % goes from 3% to 24% by 2025 (50%+ CGR), will TSLA hold its current 23% EV share (so TSLA CGR also 50%+)? Shorts say no.
2/ There’s no debate about my 2025 P/E of 50x if vol growth continues at 50%+ CGR. It’s math. The debate is over what will $TSLA ‘s growth rate be as new EV competition comes in. Shorts naively assume growth reverts to the mean as ICE mfrs respond with new EVs of their own.
3/ What shorts miss: a) $TSLA TAM keeps expanding to new categories (CUV, pickups, <€25k), and b) TSLA demand is still constrained by lack of supply. FY’22 is setting up as repeat of FY’20 as we get combo of entry to new segments (pickups) and simultaneous double in capacity.
Read 4 tweets
17 May
Looks like Michael Burry buys into the FUD that ex-Reg Credits and #btc profits, $TSLA makes no money. Guess we’ll find out after 2Q vols and earnings who is right. Half a billion dollars is a big bet. @elonmusk @MartinViecha cnbc.com/amp/2021/05/17…
The CNBC article is likely incorrect. The $530B is likely the notional value of the puts since the 800,100 x $668 price on 3/31 = $530B. The actual value of Burry’s puts is likely far less (multiply by the delta on the puts). Still, let’s burry him @elonmusk. $tsla
Sorry…meant 800,100 (8,001 contracts) x $668 = $530M (not $B). If Burry has $TSLA Jan 2022 puts at $500 strike, his exposure is 800,100 x $72 = $58M.
Read 5 tweets
14 Apr
At $100B market cap ($375/sh.), $COIN valuation isn’t extreme if one naively annualizes 1Q results:
- 13.9x FY’21 Rev (1Q $1.8B)
- 22.7x FY’21 Ebitda (1Q $1.1B)
- 34.2x FY’21 EPS (1Q $730M)

I’m using fully diluted shares of 261.3M (261.3 x $375 = $100B)

$COIN is #btc tollbooth
I’m standing clear at $380 but would be interested <$300. No PT. $COIN
I think $COIN will trade below $381 first trade by end of today.
Read 5 tweets
10 Apr
When an investor tells me $TSLA is expensive and posts a Bloomberg screenshot showing a 157x forward EPS I lose it. Nobody would value a long tail growth name like $SQ or $SHOP or $TSLA on next year’s earnings, just like nobody would’ve valued $AMZN on next year EPS 10 years ago.
2/ Every first year finance student is taught the right way to value any asset is with discounted cash flow (DCF). For $TSLA even if you don’t want to accept @elonmusk 50% volume growth assumption, assume EV adoption will grow from 3% in 2020 to 50% by 2030 (32% CGR).
3/ Next, project $TSLA EV share, which has increased steadily from 17% in 2018 to 19% in 2019 to 23% in 2020 as TSLA has expanded TAM by entering new markets and segments, and despite new competition. Even if you hold TSLA EV share at its current 25%, which is conservative..
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(