The ransacking of drug stores, often by people addicted to opioids &/or meth, results from the decriminalizing of theft of items under $950, & possession of 3 grams of hard drugs, which occurred under Prop 47 in 2014 (which Gov. @GavinNewsom advocated & has not repudiated)
- liberalizing drug laws increases overdoses & poisonings
- increasing reliance on unreliable energy increases blackouts
- making housing & energy scarce & expensive increases poverty
- diverting money away from clearing brush around wires increases wildfire risk
- closing reliable nuclear & nat gas plants causes blackouts
- having the state’s largest energy & health companies pay the salary of the governor’s wife constitutes an ugly conflict of interest
- not enforcing laws against open air drug dealing and use, camping in parks and other public spaces, and public defecation encourage homeless encampments
- diverting money from shelters to $750k slow-to-build units results in ~75% of homeless being *unsheltered*
- not mandating addiction and/or psychiatric treatment of the mentally ill and/or addicted who repeatedly commit crimes results in *both* mass incarceration *and* mass homelessness
- having no consequences for drug dealers & @Snapchat for poisoning deaths of kids = more death
The percent of shoplifting cases ending in arrest in San Francisco declined from 62% in 2013 to 17% in 2021
Big declines occurred after the passage of Prop. 47 in 2014, which decriminalized the shoplifting of items valued under $950, & after election of new D.A. in 2019
Why are arrests down? Because prosecutions are down. Police increasingly don't bother arresting people because there's no point in doing so. Everyone knows this and yet there are still some people who know better who claim declining *arrests* are proof of declining *crime.*
But it’s actually worse than that. There is evidence that many shoplifting crimes aren’t even *reported* much less prosecuted.
In other words, your perception of increased shoplifting theft is supported by the evidence, and many of the powers-that-be are gas-lighting you.
People on the East Coast often disbelieve the stories we tell them
The data show an increase in both larceny and property crimes in SF
And so what we're pointing out here is that the increase is likely to be *significantly* larger, given the declining arrest to report ratio, *and* the anecdotal reports of declining reports
Here's a video of what life is like today at one of California's most famous beaches
“The Representation Project, a nonprofit founded by First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom received $800k from Pacific Gas & Electric Co., AT&T, Comcast and Kaiser Permanente. In 2015, the year Gavin Newsom announced his run for governor, contributions increased 30% to $1.6M”
“Gov. Newsom isn’t the only Democrat exploiting this glaring loophole….companies with business before the Legislature dished out over $500,000 in donations and event sponsorships to nonprofits tied to Annie Lam, wife of Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon.”
The philosophy of “Everyone just has to hit bottom” and “You can’t force someone” is used to justify the totally unnecessary deaths of 90,000 people in the U.S. annually
It’s an immoral ideology, and disproven by civilized nations
In Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Lisbon, Vienna, and Zürich, law enforcement and social service workers broke up the open drug scenes, what we call “homeless encampments, mandated treatment, and provided basic shelter, not luxury apartments costing $750k to $1M in expensive cities.
What are called "homeless encampments" in Venice Beach and Skid Row in L.A., the Tenderloin and Blade neighborhoods of SF & Seattle, are what Europeans call "open drug scenes," and view as threats to public health & safety.
Progressive harm reduction and drug decriminalization advocates, myself included, have been misled, and in turn misled others, about what places like the Netherlands and Portugal *actually* did to deal with addiction
"The power shortages are raising concerns that Taipei’s ambitious plan to decommission all its nuclear power plants by 2025 and replace them with gas and renewable energy could be delayed."
"The significant reduction in Japan's thermal [weather-independent] power capacity, which comprises 70% of its energy mix, could threaten the country's power supply without a significant boost in the utilization of nuclear power."