Just finished a piece on secular stagnation and interest rate. Developed version of what I send a few month ago to Trust and Estate magazine. Here are the main points: 1- key driver of interest-rate trend is monetary policy. It is not inflation, fiscal balance, or credit rating.
2- to make sense of what interest rates will do in the future, need to make expectations about what FOMC will do 3- low-growth + high leverage economy makes it difficult for FOMC to raise rate quickly and much + low inflation will persist no incentive to raise policy rates much.
4- growing inequalities, jobless recovery, growing job precariousness, lack of shared prosperity => we can expect low rate to last for a decade or more unless policies are put in place to reverse stagnationist forces.
5- low interest rate environment poses challenge for Money Manager Capitalism that is deeper than "bubble". Money managers have rate of return targets => buy riskier assets and use leverage to compensate for low => promotes use and spread of Ponzi finance
6- Private pension system can't generate financial safety for retirees without promoting overall financial fragility.
7- Economic growth is demand driven (Domar, Walker and Vatter, PKs...) and investment-led growth is unstable => central role for gov to promote ecological and financially sustainable shared economic growth
8- example of major role: ILE show need of rapid and radical shift in energy structure that requires heavy involvement of gov at all levels to shift domestic resources to that goal (R&D, invention to innovation, dvpt and promotion of market)
IEA (not ILE): International Energy Agency (recent Net Zero by 2050 report)
As for my other papers, draft will be on my webpage shortly
A few graphs and tables from the paper (US driven I am afraid)
Monetary policy and nominal interest rates, January 1919 to June 2021
Figure 3. Fiscal Balance and Interest Rates, 1900 to 2021
Figure 4 Inflation and interest rates, 1919 to 2021 (Here only shows long-term rates)
Figure 5. A century of fiscal balance and inflation, Q1 1914 to Q1 2021
This "bitcoin is better than gold" statement going around once more show that bitcoiners have no clue about monetary history and what the purpose of a monetary system is. A thread.
1- Metal standards were never inflexible; they could not in order to operate properly. Qty of metal was changed, usually lowered, to accommodate for changing economic conditions: price of metal, scarcity of coins, financial needs of economic units (state and private), etc.
2- The purpose of a monetary system is to make the rest of the economy go. It is there to accommodate financial needs. The more elastic one can design the supply, the better.
That doesn't mean that monetary creation & destruction shouldn't follow any rules & have no constraint.
Ingredients:
4 eggs
200g of flower
300g of ham
200g of shredded cheese 1/2 expresso cup of milk
1 expresso cup of oil
One soup spoon of yeast
One loaf pan that is buttered and floured
1- Shred the ham 2- Beat the eggs 3- Mix flower and yeast and add bit by bit to eggs 4- Add ham and cheese and mix well 5- Put in loaf pan 6- Cook at 230F for 15 min 7- Cook at 390f for 45 min
Done.
An animated GIF of the financial balances through time. OECD countries. DPB: Domestic private sector balance, GB: Government balance, FB: Foreign balance.
DPB + GB + FB = 0
It looks to me that we can detect a cycle that reflects the business cycle. Start NE, goes SW, goes E, goes N. Start again. May be I am reading too much into it.