Interesting thread on the new Australia deal here. With an interesting tidbit about "movement of people"

Here's my prediction on what this might mean... #r4today
It's possible ofc, that this government really is aiming to achieve what the governments of the 80s were not QUITE racist enough to fully implement:
A free movement area with the "old" (white) colonies.
I highly doubt it, but no doubt some will characterise it as such either way.
More likely imho is an increase in limited legal migration pathways. I've banged on about the India deal here, explaining why a few thousand time-limited visas is likely, if anything, to *increase* the number of people who end up living here without papers
Unlike the 3,000 visas allocated to temporary Indian migrants, however, young temporary migrants coming from Australia on the Youth Mobility Scheme are capped at 30,000.
Those numbers have, to my knowledge, never been fulfilled. About 10,000 actually come on this scheme per year.
So they'd have to make the visa more attractive in order to make the deal meaningful in terms of legal migration opportunities between the two countries.
For now the visa limits residence to just 2 years, is only open to people under 30, & cannot be extended to allow settlement.
Other option is to introduce some new, bespoke, high skilled & sector-specific migration routes.
If they're being thematic, these might be for highly qualified agriculture and farming experts? Or it just may be for general high paid folks again. Either way it will benefit v few.
The likelihood is that this focuses on limited mobility for lower paid, flexibilised workers, since that's what the UK needs.
(Let's be honest here I'm less clear on what Australia wants from us in terms of migration. It may be limits on OUR young, low-paid folks going THERE?)
They don't fit the stereotype, but given time-limited visas, Australians do overstay & become undocumented here.

Something tells me no fanfare about easier deportations of Australians "with no right to be here" will be part of the press on this like it was with India, though 🤔
Oh, & on this point, come talk to me when the International Trade Department takes this to the level of the Home Office & reannounces the same "digital border services" (that are likely to reproduce & entrench racist exclusion) since 2018 to today 🙄😅
Talking of which, you know what that will be one of the things they'll reannounce as part of this Australia deal.
The digital border systems that Ozzies with biometric passports will be able to use are bound to get another plug.
Big woop. Home Office AI is racist. #r4today
Looong story short there's only a few areas this Home Secretary is comfortable moving in when it comes to migration, but Australia is a very different fish in this domain than India.

Wait & see, but please I beg you to be sceptical about how they try to spin it.
(I'm getting misread here, so, to be clear, I obv don't think introducing free movement with Australia is *in itself* racist. It's a historical point I'm making. Anyway one way or the other, guys, I do not think it's going to happen.)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zoe Gardner

Zoe Gardner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZoeJardiniere

4 Jun
The UK & Denmark still locked in a despicable race to the bottom on how to slither out of responsibility for refugee protection.

Both of these two rich countries have given themselves permission to send asylum seekers away to any other country on Earth... amp.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun…
Of course the problem for both is it's not just your own permission you need to palm off your asylum responsibilities on other countries, but those other countries' permission too.

Neither has yet managed to convince another country why on Earth they should take on our refugees?
Interesting (in a completely sickening way) that each takes a slightly different tactic for ducking reviewing the protection claims of a few thousand desperate people.

Denmark seeks to just process people's claims elsewhere, presumably allowing those recognised back in again...
Read 13 tweets
3 Jun
One to watch out for. Did the Home Secretary act unlawfully in trapping vulnerable asylum seekers in filthy, dilapidated disused barracks during a pandemic?

Or was she behaving simply despicably & immorally?
Either way, what's the betting she won't be sacked?
Oh look, Priti Patel did in fact act unlawfully in detaining asylum seekers in the squalid, inadequate & Covid-unsafe Napier barracks.

The system for identifying victims of trafficking or torture or with mental health problems was totally inadequate. judiciary.uk/judgments/the-…
Are we surprised? No, we are not surprised. But it is still a shocking disgrace.

The verdict is absolutely damning:

"On the evidence, it was inevitable that there would be a major outbreak of Covid-19 infections at the Barracks."
Read 7 tweets
3 Jun
Good to hear someone point out that last summer the govt spent £16 million on another fence in Calais (worked so well), alongside many millions more on vanity projects since.
When the political will is there, money can always be found. Just not for our school kids today #r4today
(Someone, in this case, being the chair of the education committee, Robert Halfon. A Tory who seems to have spotted that his party only picks from its magic money tree when it feels like it.)
It's genuinely interesting how this government chooses to pick political battles over children's welfare issues.
You'd think the wide public support for, you know, feeding and educating kids in this country would sway them even if their conscience didn't... but not a bit of it.
Read 5 tweets
28 May
Literally how is it possible for idiot after idiot to go unchallenged on #r4today saying that Europe's borders are somehow "open" when we can see the desperate, often deadly, measures people are forced to take to try and cross them - PRECISELY BECAUSE THEY ARE CLOSED?
These people quite literally will not be satisfied that we have locked enough refugees out of our rich countries until we replace the fucking Mediterranean Sea with a mine field and barbed wire.

Their dream is a wall around the rich world. But people will always build a ladder.
Deep breath and I'll say once more: migration is natural. Migration is life. People move. Have always & will always move.

You make that work or you make it deadly. The one thing you cannot do is make it stop.
European borders are NOT open and THAT is why migration is a problem.
Read 6 tweets
26 May
Anyone who's been enjoying the Cummings thing today has forgotten that this government simply doesn't take accountability and even if everything Cummings said was 100% verifiably true almost definitely eff all would come of it & the Tories will gain 12 pts in the polls.
Biggest thing that could possibly come of it is Hancock goes and honestly, who gaf about that?
Yes. I'm bloody moody today, could you tell?
On reflection, I do not deny that some of it made for some quality content. But that's as far as it goes 🤷‍♀️
Read 4 tweets
24 May
Priti Patel will be announcing some re-hashed and possibly some new immigration policies today at an event by @BrightblueGB, nominally the progressive think tank of the Tory party.

I'll be tweeting my thoughts & some context if I can on this thread 👀👇
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
Patel will be once again claiming overwhelming public support for her anti-migrant and anti-refugee agenda, despite extremely limited evidence of anything of the kind.

Immigration is not a top concern in the country any more, but by God she's sure trying to change that.
Thanks to those who pointed out I in fact did mean @WeAreBrightBlue who are running the event alongside @britishfuture and who have put on a very interesting-looking couple of panels to follow on from the Home Secretary's speech discussing the challenges her policies provoke.
Read 31 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(