Since Batman and his sex life blew up Twitter yesterday, I suppose I would a bad comics historian if I didn't give you a THREAD on sex and comics. So here we go! (Cover your eyes, kids 👀) #twitterstorians Image
If you weren't paying attention yesterday, Batman trended for most of the day because of a Variety article that mentioned (as an aside) that DC wouldn't allow Batman to perform oral sex in their "Harley Quinn" animated series. Here's the article: variety.com/2021/tv/featur…
Here's the part that really blew up the Twitters: "Superheroes don't do that." Image
So, sex has always been a major issue in the world of comics. Why? Because of the popular perception that cartoons are for kids! Through the second quarter of the twentieth century, there were a series of social campaigns against comics content. Image
In the mid-1950s, the fight went all the way to the US Senate in a wild set of hearings (TN's Estes Kefauver was the chair) where the comics industry was put on trial. In the end, the senators judged that comics weren't actually a danger, but the cultural consequences were done. Image
In the short term, this controversy meant the death of one of the most creative and edgy forces in midcentury comics: EC Comics. For a great recent investigation on that classic, check out @QianaWhitted's book.
amazon.com/EC-Comics-Soci…
The long term ramification was that the US comics industry began self-censoring as a defense against future public campaigns. This is the origin of the Comics Code Authority. Image
The Code outlawed virtually all instances of sexual content, including nudity, "suggestive and salacious illustration," "illicit sex relations," and "sexual abnormalities." This is to say that comics would help hold the lines of midcentury sexual norms. Image
The place to start reading about the various iterations and adaptations and eventual demise of the Code, check out Amy Nyberg’s “Seal of Approval.”
amazon.com/Seal-Approval-…
So let's talk specifically about Batman and sex. First of all, of course, is the innuendos of Batman and Robin's relationship. Apparently it became quite the unspoken joke during midcentury to suggest a suspiciously close relationship between the caped crusaders. Image
This dynamic is precisely what Dana Carvey (and thereafter SNL) picked up on with the infamous "Ambiguously Gay Duo" animated sketch. Image
None of this meant that Bruce and Dick were gay (or bi). But it wasn't passing the notice of creators and audiences alike, either.
Sex and seduction were a key dynamic in the Adam West Batman TV show of the mid-1960s, as well. Many remember this show as having made a joke of Batman, but the truth is that it fairly accurately recreated the dynamics of that era in the comics.
Much of this sexual undertone centered on Julie Newmar's Catwoman (fitting for our present discussion!). This version of the character used her feminine sexual power to manipulate a very susceptible Batman. Sexual tension was fundamental to the relationship, but never consumation
There has been controversy over Bruce Wayne's relationship with Talia (daughter of villain Ra's al Ghul) which resulted in the birth of Damian Wayne. This character's backstory has been rather muddled to make him a byproduct of "genetic engineering" rather than sexual intercourse Image
In 2018, a now infamous scene in "Batman: Damned" depicted Bruce Wayne naked in the Batcave with his "bat member" in view. This sparked a controversy that resulted in DC having the image recolored to eliminate frontal nudity. Image
But there are definitely recent examples of exploring Batman's sexuality. In @FrankMillerInk & @JimLee infamous "Allstar Batman and Robin," Batman engages in a highly sexualized encounter with Black Canary. Image
In 2016, DC Animation released an adaptation of Alan Moore's famous story "The Killing Joke" in which the writers interjected a new sex scene between Batman and Batgirl (daughter of Batman friend, James Gordon). Fans were very unhappy, not about the sex, but the pairing. Image
In @TomKingTK run on Batman, the writer leaned heavily into the relationship between Bat and Cat, even going so far as to (nearly) having the two marry. The interactions between the two certainly suggested that they enjoyed a "no-holds-barred" sexual relationship. Image
The success of their soap operatic relationship has led to a popular spinoff focused specifically on the pairing of Catwoman and Batman by @TomKingTK and @Clay_Mann_. Image
So this bring this thing home: what does this discussion of Batman's sexuality have to say about American culture? I few things, I think.
First, this concern reflects our nation's anxiety about children and sexuality. Throughout our history there has been great debate over what should be taught to kids and by whom. This debate has only intensive in wake of the 1960s/'70s "Sexual Revolution."
Because many assume that cartoons and comics are for children, they is an anxiety that sexual content might defile the presumed innocence of minors. I've written about this in my book CHARLIE BROWN'S AMERICA. Image
Second, this present episode reveals the continued discomfort of mainstream media producers (and consumer groups) with depictions of explicitly *female* sexual acts. There is no coincidence that DC execs were outlawing Batman performing oral sex on Catwoman. Image
Finally, the reaction of fans and creators yesterday reveals something interesting about Batman: there has long been a battle between executive owners and creators/consumers over *who OWNS the character*.
Of course, the technical/legal answer is that DC owns Batman. But this character has become so integral to American culture that many others feel ownership in this character and openly act on those feelings, like they did yesterday online. Consider some examples:
WARNING: These are graphic, kiddos!
Anyways.... you get the point. This is a fight over childhood, over women's sexuality, over cultural ownership. All taking place in the world of Batman, believe it or not.
And I didn't even say anything about Michelle Pfeiffer Catwoman....

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Blake Scott Ball

Blake Scott Ball Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bsb1945

11 Oct 20
Since it appears many of the historians that typically rush to launch anti-conservative threads are silent on debunking this "court packing" lie that Biden is spinning, I'll take this one on.

Let's talk about Franklin Roosevelt and what "court packing" really is. THREAD 1/
After winning Congress and the WH in 1932, FDR led Democrats on a blazing array of new legislation meant to stave off the effects of the Great Depression. This is what we refer to as the New Deal.

Republicans didn't have the votes to block it. The Court, however... 2/
The Supreme Court had been filled with a conservative majority by Republicans. In a number of major cases, like FDR's industrial recovery program (NIRA) and the agricultural recovery program (AAA), the Court ruled that the New Deal was unconstitutional. This infuriated FDR. 3/
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(