Share this page!

Maybe Scrolly?
Hans Mahncke Profile picture
Twitter logo
15 Jun, 5 tweets, 2 min read
The Putin interview is very good. This guy is on top of his game, knows every issue in detail, knows how to pivot, knows how to troll. He just runs rings around this NBC stenographer. Biden is going to have a tough day tomorrow.
Trump level trolling here.
The NBC stenographer had a bad day. Lol.
"I control the time here."
"What would've happened if he'd fought a cop in your country? He would have been shot dead on the spot and that's the end of it. Isn't that the case?"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Hans Mahncke

Hans Mahncke Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HansMahncke

Hans Mahncke Profile picture
12 Jun
ICYMI, @amymaxmen is a "journalist" working for Nature magazine. She's been shilling for Daszak for a long time.

Today she claimed a photo of her and Daszak was doctored.

Turns out there's an entire 95 minute video of her with Daszak.
h/t @alamentarius
c-span.org/video/?404875-…
Strangely neither Daszak's name nor the name of his fellow natural origins hoaxer Ian Lipkin appear on the webpage of the event where Amy say next to Peter.

The page was not archived until today so no way of knowing whether Pulitzer scrubbed the names.
pulitzercenter.org/event/new-york…
Peter Daszak, who's that? Never met the guy.
Read 4 tweets
Hans Mahncke Profile picture
7 Jun
The Nature op-ed of March 17, 2020 was an even more forceful message to scientists the world over: Investigate lab leak and you will be tarred as a crackpot.

'any type of laboratory-based scenario is NOT plausible'

The op-ed also seeded the pangolin hoax.

Who were the authors?
The main author is Kristian Andersen, the guy who just deleted all his tweets. On Jan 31, 2020 Andersen told Fauci that the virus had engineered looking features. The next day, they had their secret, emergency teleconference. After the teleconference, Anderson changed his tune.
The Nature op-ed had a huge impact in shaping the media's narrative and was used by Fauci himself to dismiss any suggestion of a lab leak. A few months later, Andersen got a huge grant from Fauci.
niaid.nih.gov/news-events/ni…
Read 10 tweets
Hans Mahncke Profile picture
6 Jun
1/ The Jan 31-Feb 2 timeline is so significant because it reveals the origins of the lab leak cover up. As soon as Fauci saw the Science article he knew he had a big problem. This kicked off a frantic 48h in which Fauci planted the seeds for a natural origins narrative.
2/ The Science article itself wasn't all that bad for Fauci but it linked to a Nature article that was far more troublesome. We know Fauci spotted this problem because he began sending his soon to be collaborators both the Science and the Nature articles.
3/ The Nature article describes gain-of-function experiments at the Wuhan lab and specifically mentions that Fauci (i.e. NIAID) had funded the experiments. Thus, we know for certain that by Jan 31, Fauci *knew* that US taxpayers had funded reckless bat virus experiments in China.
Read 11 tweets
Hans Mahncke Profile picture
2 Jun
On the very day that the country was shut down , Fauci took the time to agreeably respond to a random TDS sufferer.
On the day before the country was shut down, Fauci took the time to agreeably respond to a random TDS sufferer.
Another one.
Read 4 tweets
Hans Mahncke Profile picture
29 Mar
"SARS-CoV-2 was remarkably well adapted to humans from its first appearance, yet poorly adapted to bat infection, the natural reservoirs for SARS-r-CoVs, with little evidence for gaining its human adaptation through natural recombination."

Aka "evidence".
link.springer.com/article/10.100…
"SARS-CoV-2′s receptor binding domain (RBD) appears to be highly optimized for binding to human ACE2"

Aka "evidence".
"The combination of binding strength, human and mouse peptide mimicry, as well as high adaptation for human infection and transmission from the earliest strains might suggest the use of humanized mice for the development of SARS-CoV-2 in a laboratory environment."

Daszak *2019*:
Read 4 tweets
Hans Mahncke Profile picture
24 Mar
1/ Some additional info related to my WIV piece in @EpochTimes.

On Feb 6, 2020, a Chinese scholar in Wuhan, Xiao Botao, published an article on the academic portal Researchgate that directly implicated the WIV in the outbreak...

theepochtimes.com/american-who-r…
2/ Xiao said that “somebody was entangled with the evolution of 2019-nCoV coronavirus.” The article was taken down quickly but not before it was archived:

archive.is/eHOIk

(Xiao is the sort of guy that the U.S. gov should be protecting instead of people like Danchenko)
3/Strangely, on Dec 31, 2019, the day the Wuhan "pneumonia" was first announced, Daszak started a tweet thread pointing the finger at the human-wildlife-livestock interface while conspicuously omitting the “high risk” laboratory interface that he himself had warned about earlier. Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @HansMahncke has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @HansMahncke!

Read all threads by @HansMahncke

:(