In today's thread we're tackling a complicated question. Why are Dems even trying to negotiate with Republicans at this point?

My answer is simple. Why are you pretending they don't have to? Bi-partisan solutions aren't a political luxury right now. They're a necessity.
(THREAD)
(2) There's a push by the media to frame every effort at passing legislation as Democrats too weak to play hard ball and Biden as niave.

This is disingenous because it entirely discounts the political reality of a split Senate. We don't have the votes.

politico.com/news/2021/01/2…
(3) We can't even corral our current caucus into ditching the fillibuster to supporting voting rights, nevermind garnering Republican votes.

The Senate is designed to support minority rule. And that's a problem we can't fix right now.

cnn.com/2021/05/20/pol…
(4) We've got to work with the reality we have not the reality we wish we had. It's wrong. It's frustrating. You should be mad as hell about it.

But blaming Dems like Manchin and Sinema or even Biden won't solve the problem. Elections will.

msnbc.com/opinion/democr…
(5) So why do Dems bother to engage in bi-partisan negotiations with obstructionists?
Well. They have to. It's the only way to get stuff passed right now.

Take the infrastructure bill as an example.
On the surface a bipartisan deal seems like a godsend.

cnbc.com/2021/06/11/bip…
(6) But this deal has a little poison pill in it. The funding Republicans have agreed to would undermine Biden's promise not raise taxes on people making less than 400K.

Democrats could put it through reconciliation but there are problems with that.

axios.com/democrats-infr…
(7) Even some moderate Dems are balking at the pricetag and there are no guarantees that Dems would be able to pass it on their own in July.

So Biden is working both processes right now. Bi-partisan processin in the front, hardball behind closed doors.

rollcall.com/2021/06/15/hug…
(8) This is how Biden and Dems have approached getting most of their extraordinarily progressive agenda passed. They inist on reaching over the aisle. They bend over backwards.

So when neogitations ultimately fail it's clear where the fault lies.

thehill.com/blogs/congress…
(9) This is NOT evidence of weakness unless you have no understanding of the political process. This is smart. It allows Dems to lay blame where it belongs ahead of a critically important election cycle.

The GOP is the problem.
They always have been.

cnn.com/2021/06/07/pol…
(10) If you're frustrated right now, get busy giving Dems the tools to fight back. What they have is a split Senate, a conservative judicial, a GOP majority in most state legislatures & the propsect of losing the House in 2022.

VOTE. ORGANIZE. RUN.
This is up to you. Get it done
(END) Thanks to @jpbergl for the thread suggestion. Come back Thursday and we'll do this again.

Like threads like this and wantto keep them coming? You can support my work here:

patreon.com/kazweida
paypal.me/kazweida

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kaz Weida

Kaz Weida Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kazweida

8 Jun
In our #TuesdayThread we're taking a closer look at what the hell is going on with the DOJ. Confirmation that they will continue to defend Trump in the E. Jean Carroll lawsuit is utterly infuriating.

Why would the DOJ defend Trump and what does it mean?
(THREAD)
(2) First it's important to be clear what the lawsuit is about. Trump is being held personally liable for defamation in regards to remarks he made about Carroll while president.

The results of this lawsuit do have wider implications.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
(3) DOJ lawyers working under the Trump administration had already argued federal workers are protected from lawsuits while executing the duties of their office. A trial judge rejected that argument and the DOJ appealed.

Enter Biden.

newsweek.com/trump-acted-sc…
Read 11 tweets
25 May
In today's thread we're asking what should be done about January 6th?

Republicans want the public to forget about it.
We can't let them gaslight us about what happened that day, but here's why we don't hold enough cards to force their hand.
(THREAD)
(2) The resolution to establish the commission passed the Dem-controlled house but it appears doomed in the Senate thanks to the filibuster.

So far Murkowski, Romney, and Collins have indicated they'd support the commmission but 10 GOP votes is doubtful.
cnn.com/politics/live-…
(3) What we can't do however is let an attempted coup and insurrection fade from public memory. Our nation's capitol and our lawmakers faced a domestic terrorist attack incited by Trump.

There must be consequences or democracy will continue to suffer.

reuters.com/world/us/us-re…
Read 10 tweets
29 Apr
A study of a clustered outbreak of the South African variant in Maryland highlights a few important takeaways:

-at least three fully vaccinated people were infected, but the only hospitalizations and deaths occurred among the unvaccinated

(THREAD)
(2) Contact tracing indicates this exposure occurred at an indoor small gathering where masks were worn but removed for eating. At least one person at the gathering was symptomatic at that time and is presumed to be the origin of the infection.
(3) The symptomatic person appears to have contracted the variant at a workplace that had already been reported to the CDC for coronavirus safety violations including people reporting for work sick and lack of social distancing and masking.
Read 6 tweets
27 Apr
In our Tuesday thread, we're tackling something that has perplexed the public for years. Why is Tucker Carlson still on the air?

From championing replacement theory to advocating harassing children wearing masks, Carlson feeds dangerous rhetoric to the public.
(THREAD) Image
(2) If you feel like this is a question we've been asking for YEARS, you're not wrong. Tucker has had so many scandals and calls for boycotts that most of us have lost track.

So why is he still on the air and how does Fox justify keeping him around?

washingtonpost.com/arts-entertain…
(3) Probably the most important thing to recognize is that boycotts of Tucker's advertisers haven't been effective in shutting down his rhetoric for a reason. Even as the show bleeds ad revenue, Fox still benefits from the outrage clicks Tucker generates.

forbes.com/sites/jonathan…
Read 10 tweets
22 Apr
In our #ThursdayThread we're discussing how Majorie Taylor Greene wants to debate @AOC on the Green New Deal. Should Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez consent to debate Greene in a public forum?

Fuck no.
Here's the top five reasons why.

(THREAD)
(2) Reason #1:
Greene hasn't even bothered to read the bill, which is only 14 pages and pretty easily digestible.

There's no surer sign that this is a publicity stunt than Greene's lack of awareness about the topic she's proposing debating.

businessinsider.com/mtg-debate-aoc…
(3) Reason #2:
Greene is a professional provocateur. She's not there to debate policy. She's a clout chaser.

The easiest way to get her to stop poisoning political discourse is to ignore her bad faith antics.

independent.co.uk/news/world/ame…
Read 9 tweets
20 Apr
In our #TuesdayThread , we're discussing deplorables Majorie Taylor Greene & Lauren Boebert. The cartoon villianesque evil duo seem to have become the center of every controversy in Washington.
Why?

The answer is simple.
Cold hard cash.
(THREAD) Image
(2) Majorie Taylor Greene is a textbook provocateur who perversely enjoys taunting and terrorizing people on camera. This is her entire persona in a nutshell.

If it gleans even a trickle of media attention, she's there to slurp it up. So very thirsty.

chicagotribune.com/nation-world/c…
(3) Boebert fits the same provocateur profile except she has a niche to exploit. Gun rights. And she'll go wherever the profits from 2A advocates take her.

She even runs a restaurant based on pissing off people in a state traumatized by gun violence.

kunc.org/2021-01-27/boe…
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(