@heavyblankey@tommy_pane 1. Here is the post that has a succinct explanation. 2. I had similar confusion re the title... it does not say what it means... Academics! Apparently this is an idea first discussed in the 70s 3. In short, it means there are racial issues that have been in play fr the beginning
@heavyblankey@tommy_pane 2/ Why this is controversial eludes me. It is pretty obvious. As such it is uncontroversial that deep racism was embedded into the founding of the country. Not only blacks, but Indians. It is embedded in the constitution. And is manifest throughout American history.
@heavyblankey@tommy_pane 3/ That said seems the problem comes when trying to discuss that in terms of today. And conflating the systemic racism that is in the laws, customs and constitution w individuals who do not like being called racist.
That is where it gets complicated. IMO.
America has had an obvious racial hierarchy w Europeans/Whites owning most of the wealth, & controlling much of the resources & making the laws that founded the country. The consequences of those beginnings reverberate to today.
@heavyblankey@tommy_pane 5/ The problem seems to be at least 3fold: 1. the argument over what to do about it. "haven't we don't enough already".. some say. 2. "I am not a racist" which may or may not be true, but is not the point 3. Race relationships are better, in broad terms, than ever But there are
@heavyblankey@tommy_pane 6/ still a long ways to go.
Compound and mix any of these core issues with others and the conversation gets fraught pretty quick.
per opening line. I think this short presentation does a reasonable job of surfacing the issues.
@heavyblankey@tommy_pane 7/ coda: Did you know that Hitler/Nazi Germany studied how the Negros were subjugated and used that information as a template for their own policies and suppressions. They found how the Americans, esp the South, kept the blacks down was a perfect analog to their own needs.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@tommy_pane GP is barely readable it is so full of tripe. The comments even more so.
I esp "enjoy" how the Trumpers have to find some off to the side detail to magnify into a mountain and then use that to insinuate "see...EVERYTHING THE ANTI TRUMP PEOPLE ARE SAYING IS WRONG..LOOK AT THIS".
@tommy_pane 2/ In the case of this article it is the Steele report. And in particular the "dossier’s most explosive claims".
Elevating the 'pee pee tape' as if this were the central and most important claim in that report is so disingenuous as to be laughable... which it is.
@tommy_pane 3/ 1st. The Steele report was never proposed as conclusive. It was a research report of issues to be followed up on. Some of the details have been validated others not, or inconclusive, as the report quoted says.
The important claim in the report was the Russia involvement in
@JakeLobin "It was a bright cold day & the clocks were striking 13"
We ought not be amazed or confounded by the cult-sotted "GOP" party & their compliant members with their staggering lack of rational consistency.
What is true at this very moment may have been false only a moment ago.
@JakeLobin 2/ Take any issue of substance, past or present, there will be a head-snapping flip. Just about the time that one settles it, flip again.
It takes a well oiled gimbal for a brain to adroitly follow what is the party line now. Not yesterday. Not tomorrow.
That to be determined.
@JakeLobin 3/ That is what 'memory holes' are for.
One day Republican leaders may strongly condemn Trump for his role in inciting insurrection. Today, it was just a bunch of tourists. Deny that? You are summarily drummed out of the party.
"How many fingers Winston?"
"How many Liz Cheney?"
@Politics_PR Let nothing trouble the crystalized beliefs
Anything that muddles the mind w facts or reality is to be ignored & forgot as soon as possible.
It never happened.
The only thing that is happening is Trump. The key to the party's getting of power.
The question is why does it work?
@Politics_PR 2/ It is not a very pleasant question.
It indicts an incredibly large percentage of the population that has gone into the fog bank that is Trumpism.
It will be increasingly hard, & embarrassing, to admit mistake. And so an error will codify into a 'religion'...
@Politics_PR 3/ And so an error will codify into a 'religion', which may be sufficient to create a new (and old) fundamental split as severe as the original one that birthed the Civil War.
And, in fact, energized by some of the very same axiomatic values & beliefs.
@tommy_pane I have read your reply. A couple of times.
I'll forebear the puzzled response. Other than to notice your amazing (to me, really it is banal, obvious, and expected by now) ability to contort basic facts into a shape that solicits a picture of a seriously gerrymandered district.
@tommy_pane 2/ What you have to ignore, & what you have to "interpret" in order to buttress your argument is so comprehensive there is nothing left of the original facts.
Your assertions/conclusions are so divorced from the facts/reality that it stuns the ability to actually engage.
@tommy_pane 3/ Which I suppose is the point of a 'religious' devotion. There is no way to contradict a "miracle". Beliefs override knowledge/science/facts.
Your beliefs are impregnable.
Which is fine. It is part of the liberty you(we) have. But it doesn’t allow for meaningful discussion
A PSA for all those who post Tucker Carlson videos and outrages:
His network argues that he is unbelievable, and the judge agrees.
Take nothing he says as meaningful of anything but absurdity and bullshit.
U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil: [accepting] arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses..is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' & 'non-literal commentary.' "
"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes.
That ancient system cannot be allow such impudence on the part of the citizens to stand.
Now we wait to find out if we are watching the sputtering end of one pathetic era, or the emergence of a new one, reborn, renewed and reenergized to take the fight into the next 50years.